Nikhila S. Udupa , Min Eun Jeon , Susan McClanahan , Megan Riddle , Jamie Manwaring , Renee D. Rienecke , Alan Duffy , Philip S. Mehler , Dan V. Blalock , Hyeouk Chris Hahm , Thomas E. Joiner
{"title":"Treatment outcomes for typical and atypical anorexia nervosa across Asian and non-Asian patients in United States higher level of care facilities","authors":"Nikhila S. Udupa , Min Eun Jeon , Susan McClanahan , Megan Riddle , Jamie Manwaring , Renee D. Rienecke , Alan Duffy , Philip S. Mehler , Dan V. Blalock , Hyeouk Chris Hahm , Thomas E. Joiner","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.05.049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Asian patients with Anorexia Nervosa (AN) face unique barriers to recovery, but may also disproportionately experience constitutional thinness. The current study compared weight-gain and psychopathology treatment outcomes between Asian and non-Asian patients, and compared patients who reached their Expected Body Weight (EBW) by discharge to those who did not. We collected data from Asian (<em>n</em> = 25 adults, 40 adolescents) and non-Asian (<em>n</em> = 966 adults, 1067 adolescents) patients in higher levels of care at United States eating disorder treatment facilities. We conducted multivariate, two-way, and mixed model ANOVAs to compare symptom severity for Asian versus non-Asian adults and adolescents at admission, discharge, and across treatment. We additionally conducted mixed model ANOVAs to compare change in psychopathology across treatment for Asian and non-Asian patients who did and did not meet their EBW by discharge. No significant differences emerged between Asian and non-Asian patients, although some differences were noted between age groups at admission and discharge. For non-Asian patients only, those who reached their EBW by discharge had, on average, significantly higher levels of restriction, shape and weight concerns, and global concerns. Results suggest that Asian and non-Asian patients similarly benefit from treatment for AN.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"188 ","pages":"Pages 10-18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625003498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Asian patients with Anorexia Nervosa (AN) face unique barriers to recovery, but may also disproportionately experience constitutional thinness. The current study compared weight-gain and psychopathology treatment outcomes between Asian and non-Asian patients, and compared patients who reached their Expected Body Weight (EBW) by discharge to those who did not. We collected data from Asian (n = 25 adults, 40 adolescents) and non-Asian (n = 966 adults, 1067 adolescents) patients in higher levels of care at United States eating disorder treatment facilities. We conducted multivariate, two-way, and mixed model ANOVAs to compare symptom severity for Asian versus non-Asian adults and adolescents at admission, discharge, and across treatment. We additionally conducted mixed model ANOVAs to compare change in psychopathology across treatment for Asian and non-Asian patients who did and did not meet their EBW by discharge. No significant differences emerged between Asian and non-Asian patients, although some differences were noted between age groups at admission and discharge. For non-Asian patients only, those who reached their EBW by discharge had, on average, significantly higher levels of restriction, shape and weight concerns, and global concerns. Results suggest that Asian and non-Asian patients similarly benefit from treatment for AN.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research:
(1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors;
(2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology;
(3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;