The PROSPECT model in high-throughput phenotyping for peanut leaf parameter estimation: Comparative performance of hyperspectral inversion models

IF 5.4 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Xue Kong , Jiangtao Zhao , Yirou Liu , Bo Bai , Juntao Yang , Yangyang Fan , Guowei Li , Zhenhai Li , Shubo Wan
{"title":"The PROSPECT model in high-throughput phenotyping for peanut leaf parameter estimation: Comparative performance of hyperspectral inversion models","authors":"Xue Kong ,&nbsp;Jiangtao Zhao ,&nbsp;Yirou Liu ,&nbsp;Bo Bai ,&nbsp;Juntao Yang ,&nbsp;Yangyang Fan ,&nbsp;Guowei Li ,&nbsp;Zhenhai Li ,&nbsp;Shubo Wan","doi":"10.1016/j.cpb.2025.100498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate estimation of leaf biochemical parameters is crucial for understanding crop physiology and monitoring nutritional status. Remote sensing algorithms perform well on limited germplasm, but the transferability to high-throughput phenotyping with diverse genotypes remains unclear. This study estimated leaf chlorophyll content (Cab), equivalent water thickness (Cw), and dry matter content (Cm) using the single vegetation index (SVI), random forest (RF), and the PROSPECT model to evaluate the performance and transferability of these models under diverse peanut germplasm conditions. Results showed that Transformed Chlorophyll Absorption in Reflectance Index (TCARI), Water Index (WI), and Modified Simple Ratio (mSR) were strongly correlated with Cab, Cw, and Cm, respectively, highlighting their importance in the inversion models. Comparative analysis revealed that the RF model achieved the highest accuracy for Cab (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.77, RMSE = 8.14 µg cm<sup>−2</sup>), Cw (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.67, RMSE = 1.1 × 10<sup>−3</sup> g cm<sup>−2</sup>), and Cm (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.50, RMSE = 6.2 × 10<sup>−4</sup> g cm<sup>−2</sup>), followed by the PROSPECT model, with R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE of 0.76 and 8.21 µg cm<sup>−2</sup> for Cab, 0.61 and 1.2 × 10<sup>−3</sup> g cm<sup>−2</sup> for Cw, and 0.38 and 7.7 × 10<sup>−4</sup> g cm<sup>−2</sup> for Cm, respectively. However, the PROSPECT model was most effective in Cab inversion across diverse germplasm resources (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.58, RMSE = 7.68 µg cm<sup>−2</sup>), demonstrating its superior transferability and stability. These results underscore its value in high-throughput phenotyping and improving the accuracy and generalizability of crop biochemical parameter estimation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38090,"journal":{"name":"Current Plant Biology","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100498"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Plant Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214662825000660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate estimation of leaf biochemical parameters is crucial for understanding crop physiology and monitoring nutritional status. Remote sensing algorithms perform well on limited germplasm, but the transferability to high-throughput phenotyping with diverse genotypes remains unclear. This study estimated leaf chlorophyll content (Cab), equivalent water thickness (Cw), and dry matter content (Cm) using the single vegetation index (SVI), random forest (RF), and the PROSPECT model to evaluate the performance and transferability of these models under diverse peanut germplasm conditions. Results showed that Transformed Chlorophyll Absorption in Reflectance Index (TCARI), Water Index (WI), and Modified Simple Ratio (mSR) were strongly correlated with Cab, Cw, and Cm, respectively, highlighting their importance in the inversion models. Comparative analysis revealed that the RF model achieved the highest accuracy for Cab (R2 = 0.77, RMSE = 8.14 µg cm−2), Cw (R2 = 0.67, RMSE = 1.1 × 10−3 g cm−2), and Cm (R2 = 0.50, RMSE = 6.2 × 10−4 g cm−2), followed by the PROSPECT model, with R2 and RMSE of 0.76 and 8.21 µg cm−2 for Cab, 0.61 and 1.2 × 10−3 g cm−2 for Cw, and 0.38 and 7.7 × 10−4 g cm−2 for Cm, respectively. However, the PROSPECT model was most effective in Cab inversion across diverse germplasm resources (R2 = 0.58, RMSE = 7.68 µg cm−2), demonstrating its superior transferability and stability. These results underscore its value in high-throughput phenotyping and improving the accuracy and generalizability of crop biochemical parameter estimation.
花生叶片参数估计高通量表型的PROSPECT模型:高光谱反演模型的比较性能
叶片生化参数的准确估计对于了解作物生理和监测作物营养状况至关重要。遥感算法在有限的种质上表现良好,但对不同基因型的高通量表型的可转移性尚不清楚。本研究利用单一植被指数(SVI)、随机森林(RF)和PROSPECT模型估算了花生叶片叶绿素含量(Cab)、等效水分厚度(Cw)和干物质含量(Cm),以评价这些模型在不同种质条件下的性能和可移植性。结果表明,转化叶绿素吸收反射率(TCARI)、水分指数(WI)和修正简单比(mSR)分别与Cab、Cw和Cm呈强相关,说明了它们在反演模型中的重要性。对比分析表明射频模型实现出租车的最高精度(R2 = 0.77, RMSE = 8.14 µg 厘米−2),连续波(R2 = 0.67, RMSE = 1.1 ×10−3 g 厘米−2),和cm (R2 = 0.50, RMSE = 6.2 ×10−4 g 厘米−2),紧随其后的是模型,R2和RMSE 0.76和8.21 µg 厘米−2辆出租车,0.61和1.2 ×10−−3 g 厘米2连续波,和0.38和7.7 ×10−4 g 厘米−2厘米,分别。然而,PROSPECT模型在不同的种质资源中最有效(R2 = 0.58, RMSE = 7.68 µg cm−2),证明了其优越的可转移性和稳定性。这些结果强调了其在高通量表型和提高作物生化参数估计的准确性和普遍性方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Plant Biology
Current Plant Biology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
32
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Current Plant Biology aims to acknowledge and encourage interdisciplinary research in fundamental plant sciences with scope to address crop improvement, biodiversity, nutrition and human health. It publishes review articles, original research papers, method papers and short articles in plant research fields, such as systems biology, cell biology, genetics, epigenetics, mathematical modeling, signal transduction, plant-microbe interactions, synthetic biology, developmental biology, biochemistry, molecular biology, physiology, biotechnologies, bioinformatics and plant genomic resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信