Selecting of global phenological field observations for validating coarse AVHRR-derived forest phenology products based on spatial heterogeneity and temporal consistency
Qi Shao , Chao Huang , Yuanjun Xiao , Li Liu , Weiwei Liu , Ran Huang , Chang Zhou , Wei Weng , Jingfeng Huang
{"title":"Selecting of global phenological field observations for validating coarse AVHRR-derived forest phenology products based on spatial heterogeneity and temporal consistency","authors":"Qi Shao , Chao Huang , Yuanjun Xiao , Li Liu , Weiwei Liu , Ran Huang , Chang Zhou , Wei Weng , Jingfeng Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global phenological field observations play a crucial role in validating remote sensing products and algorithms. However, due to the spatial mismatch and scale effect between the field observations and the pixels of remote sensing phenology products, a direct comparison often leads to scale errors and increased uncertainty. Therefore, evaluating the spatial representativeness of field observations for remote sensing product validation is essential. This study developed a novel “bottom-up” evaluation framework named MSPT (<strong>M</strong>ain land cover type, <strong>S</strong>patial heterogeneity, <strong>P</strong>oint-area consistency and <strong>T</strong>emporal consistency), which comprehensively assesses the spatial representativeness of forest phenological field observations within the coarse spatial scale. Based on MSPT method, the capability of global forest phenological field observations to support coarse-scale remote sensing validation was evaluated. Compared with the general method, MSPT significantly improved validation performance. For the start of the growing season (SOS), the root mean square error (RMSE) decreased from 49.70 to 33.75 days, and the percent bias (PBIAS) changed from −0.14 to 0.03. For the end of the growing season (EOS), the RMSE was reduced from 83.42 to 42.53 days, and the PBIAS decreased from 0.15 to 0.08. These findings demonstrate that MSPT enhances the reliability of validation datasets and effectively reducing uncertainty in the evaluation of coarse AVHRR-derived forest phenology products. The framework offers new insights into resolving the scale mismatch between field observations and the pixels of remote sensing products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51024,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Informatics","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 103216"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954125002250","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Global phenological field observations play a crucial role in validating remote sensing products and algorithms. However, due to the spatial mismatch and scale effect between the field observations and the pixels of remote sensing phenology products, a direct comparison often leads to scale errors and increased uncertainty. Therefore, evaluating the spatial representativeness of field observations for remote sensing product validation is essential. This study developed a novel “bottom-up” evaluation framework named MSPT (Main land cover type, Spatial heterogeneity, Point-area consistency and Temporal consistency), which comprehensively assesses the spatial representativeness of forest phenological field observations within the coarse spatial scale. Based on MSPT method, the capability of global forest phenological field observations to support coarse-scale remote sensing validation was evaluated. Compared with the general method, MSPT significantly improved validation performance. For the start of the growing season (SOS), the root mean square error (RMSE) decreased from 49.70 to 33.75 days, and the percent bias (PBIAS) changed from −0.14 to 0.03. For the end of the growing season (EOS), the RMSE was reduced from 83.42 to 42.53 days, and the PBIAS decreased from 0.15 to 0.08. These findings demonstrate that MSPT enhances the reliability of validation datasets and effectively reducing uncertainty in the evaluation of coarse AVHRR-derived forest phenology products. The framework offers new insights into resolving the scale mismatch between field observations and the pixels of remote sensing products.
期刊介绍:
The journal Ecological Informatics is devoted to the publication of high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of computational ecology, data science and biogeography. The scope of the journal takes into account the data-intensive nature of ecology, the growing capacity of information technology to access, harness and leverage complex data as well as the critical need for informing sustainable management in view of global environmental and climate change.
The nature of the journal is interdisciplinary at the crossover between ecology and informatics. It focuses on novel concepts and techniques for image- and genome-based monitoring and interpretation, sensor- and multimedia-based data acquisition, internet-based data archiving and sharing, data assimilation, modelling and prediction of ecological data.