Xin Zhao , Rui Wang , Andrea Gatto , Chuanming Liu , Xiaomin Wei
{"title":"Is market mechanism a reasonable path for agricultural emission reduction? Evidence from China carbon emission trading scheme","authors":"Xin Zhao , Rui Wang , Andrea Gatto , Chuanming Liu , Xiaomin Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine the mechanism of the carbon emissions trading pilot to lower the <span><math><msub><mi>CO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></math></span> emissions of agriculture using empirical data from China, from the viewpoints of market mechanisms and spatial spillover effects. We use the DID to assess the pilot program's effectiveness in curtailing GHG emissions. We find a significant advantage in limiting <span><math><msub><mi>CO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></math></span> emissions, using carbon emission data from 30 Chinese provinces from 2011 to 2022. The results are as follows: (1) An inhibitory effect is detected, showing that introducing a carbon trading program could reduce agricultural carbon emissions by 0.167 %; this finding passed the robustness test. (2) The results of the intermediate impact model demonstrate that carbon emissions trading may play a role in influencing agricultural carbon emissions via technological innovation. (3) Meanwhile, regional resource allocation efficiency adjusts the carbon reduction effect. (4) Pilot regions demonstrate joint emission reduction effects with neighboring regions, which show a positive spillover effect. Therefore, scientific and agricultural technology innovation should be fostered to realize technological research, gradually form a market governance mechanism for agricultural soils, and comprehensively enhance the carbon sink capacity of agricultural soils. This will ensure the sustainable and steady development of food systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 107972"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525001696","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We examine the mechanism of the carbon emissions trading pilot to lower the emissions of agriculture using empirical data from China, from the viewpoints of market mechanisms and spatial spillover effects. We use the DID to assess the pilot program's effectiveness in curtailing GHG emissions. We find a significant advantage in limiting emissions, using carbon emission data from 30 Chinese provinces from 2011 to 2022. The results are as follows: (1) An inhibitory effect is detected, showing that introducing a carbon trading program could reduce agricultural carbon emissions by 0.167 %; this finding passed the robustness test. (2) The results of the intermediate impact model demonstrate that carbon emissions trading may play a role in influencing agricultural carbon emissions via technological innovation. (3) Meanwhile, regional resource allocation efficiency adjusts the carbon reduction effect. (4) Pilot regions demonstrate joint emission reduction effects with neighboring regions, which show a positive spillover effect. Therefore, scientific and agricultural technology innovation should be fostered to realize technological research, gradually form a market governance mechanism for agricultural soils, and comprehensively enhance the carbon sink capacity of agricultural soils. This will ensure the sustainable and steady development of food systems.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.