Exploring the dynamic determinants of general aviation accidents across flight phases and time: A random parameter bivariate probit approach with heterogeneity in means
IF 12.5 1区 工程技术Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"Exploring the dynamic determinants of general aviation accidents across flight phases and time: A random parameter bivariate probit approach with heterogeneity in means","authors":"Qingli Liu , Penglin Song , Fan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.amar.2025.100386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>General aviation experiences significant variation in accident characteristics across flight phases. This study seeks to investigate the phase transferability and temporal stability of determinants influencing general aviation accidents, using the U.S. data (2008–2019) from the National Transportation Safety Board. To achieve this, a random parameter bivariate approach with heterogeneity in means was employed, focusing on two binary outcomes: injury severity (fatal/severe vs. minor/none) and aircraft damage (destroyed vs. non-destroyed). Four flight phases were analyzed: departure, enroute, maneuvering, and arrival. The data were divided into three time periods, 2008–2011, 2012–2015, and 2016–2019, to assess the determinants’ temporal stability. Likelihood ratio tests revealed that pilot injury and aircraft damage risks exhibit phase non-transferability and temporal instability. Out-of-sample predictions indicated a steady rise in fatal or severe injury risk, while aircraft damage risk initially increased before declining over time. A significant positive correlation between pilot injury and aircraft damage was observed through model estimation. Key factors, including pilot, aircraft, flight, and environmental conditions, significantly influenced both outcomes. Moreover, factors such as decision-making errors, adverse physiological conditions, fixed landing gear, and visual meteorological conditions showed both phase transferability and temporal stability. However, most factors were phase- and period-specific. Based on these findings, targeted measures, such as pilot escape and survival training, as well as phase-specific, scenario-based training, are proposed to mitigate general aviation risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47520,"journal":{"name":"Analytic Methods in Accident Research","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100386"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytic Methods in Accident Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221366572500017X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
General aviation experiences significant variation in accident characteristics across flight phases. This study seeks to investigate the phase transferability and temporal stability of determinants influencing general aviation accidents, using the U.S. data (2008–2019) from the National Transportation Safety Board. To achieve this, a random parameter bivariate approach with heterogeneity in means was employed, focusing on two binary outcomes: injury severity (fatal/severe vs. minor/none) and aircraft damage (destroyed vs. non-destroyed). Four flight phases were analyzed: departure, enroute, maneuvering, and arrival. The data were divided into three time periods, 2008–2011, 2012–2015, and 2016–2019, to assess the determinants’ temporal stability. Likelihood ratio tests revealed that pilot injury and aircraft damage risks exhibit phase non-transferability and temporal instability. Out-of-sample predictions indicated a steady rise in fatal or severe injury risk, while aircraft damage risk initially increased before declining over time. A significant positive correlation between pilot injury and aircraft damage was observed through model estimation. Key factors, including pilot, aircraft, flight, and environmental conditions, significantly influenced both outcomes. Moreover, factors such as decision-making errors, adverse physiological conditions, fixed landing gear, and visual meteorological conditions showed both phase transferability and temporal stability. However, most factors were phase- and period-specific. Based on these findings, targeted measures, such as pilot escape and survival training, as well as phase-specific, scenario-based training, are proposed to mitigate general aviation risks.
期刊介绍:
Analytic Methods in Accident Research is a journal that publishes articles related to the development and application of advanced statistical and econometric methods in studying vehicle crashes and other accidents. The journal aims to demonstrate how these innovative approaches can provide new insights into the factors influencing the occurrence and severity of accidents, thereby offering guidance for implementing appropriate preventive measures. While the journal primarily focuses on the analytic approach, it also accepts articles covering various aspects of transportation safety (such as road, pedestrian, air, rail, and water safety), construction safety, and other areas where human behavior, machine failures, or system failures lead to property damage or bodily harm.