Comparing the outcomes of traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries in patients presenting with fracture-dislocation versus those with cervical canal stenosis

IF 0.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Morteza Taheri, Abdolhadi Daneshi, Mohammad Hossein Ghazvini, Parisa Javadnia
{"title":"Comparing the outcomes of traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries in patients presenting with fracture-dislocation versus those with cervical canal stenosis","authors":"Morteza Taheri,&nbsp;Abdolhadi Daneshi,&nbsp;Mohammad Hossein Ghazvini,&nbsp;Parisa Javadnia","doi":"10.1016/j.inat.2025.102051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>In this research, we evaluated the long-term outcomes of patients who experienced traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries resulting from fracture-dislocation or canal stenosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seventy-two patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries, aged 18 to 72 months post-injury, were evaluated. Participants were categorized based on the etiological mechanism of injury, specifically canal stenosis versus fracture-dislocation. Comparative analyses were conducted between these two groups to assess differences and outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean age of patients was 44.47 ± 15.32 years, with a male predominance at 81.9 %. Among the patients, 43 experienced cervical cord injuries attributed to fracture-dislocations of the cervical vertebrae, while 29 had injuries resulting from cervical canal stenosis. The predominant mechanism of trauma was falls, followed by motor vehicle accidents. The C5 vertebra was the most frequently fractured level, with C5/C6 and C6/C7 noted as the most common dislocation levels. The mean interval from injury to surgical decompression was 4.27 ± 6.98 days, with an average hospitalization duration of 22.83 ± 21.76 days. The mean follow-up period was 43.83 ± 14.43 months. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the two groups concerning age, hospitalization duration, trauma mechanism, clinical presentation, incomplete cord injury status, and in-hospital mortality. However, the outcomes—including post-discharge mortality and scores on SF12 PCS and SF12 MCS—showed no significant differences between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrated that, while short-term outcomes, particularly in-hospital mortality, are elevated in patients presenting with fracture dislocation compared to those with cervical canal stenosis, long-term prognoses do not inherently indicate worse outcomes in terms of mortality or quality of life for the former group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38138,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 102051"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751925000635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

In this research, we evaluated the long-term outcomes of patients who experienced traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries resulting from fracture-dislocation or canal stenosis.

Methods

Seventy-two patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries, aged 18 to 72 months post-injury, were evaluated. Participants were categorized based on the etiological mechanism of injury, specifically canal stenosis versus fracture-dislocation. Comparative analyses were conducted between these two groups to assess differences and outcomes.

Results

The mean age of patients was 44.47 ± 15.32 years, with a male predominance at 81.9 %. Among the patients, 43 experienced cervical cord injuries attributed to fracture-dislocations of the cervical vertebrae, while 29 had injuries resulting from cervical canal stenosis. The predominant mechanism of trauma was falls, followed by motor vehicle accidents. The C5 vertebra was the most frequently fractured level, with C5/C6 and C6/C7 noted as the most common dislocation levels. The mean interval from injury to surgical decompression was 4.27 ± 6.98 days, with an average hospitalization duration of 22.83 ± 21.76 days. The mean follow-up period was 43.83 ± 14.43 months. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the two groups concerning age, hospitalization duration, trauma mechanism, clinical presentation, incomplete cord injury status, and in-hospital mortality. However, the outcomes—including post-discharge mortality and scores on SF12 PCS and SF12 MCS—showed no significant differences between the groups.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that, while short-term outcomes, particularly in-hospital mortality, are elevated in patients presenting with fracture dislocation compared to those with cervical canal stenosis, long-term prognoses do not inherently indicate worse outcomes in terms of mortality or quality of life for the former group.
比较骨折脱位与颈椎管狭窄患者外伤性颈脊髓损伤的预后
在本研究中,我们评估了因骨折脱位或椎管狭窄导致的外伤性颈脊髓损伤患者的长期预后。方法对72例外伤后18 ~ 72个月的颈脊髓损伤患者进行回顾性分析。参与者根据损伤的病因机制进行分类,特别是椎管狭窄和骨折脱位。对两组进行比较分析,以评估差异和结果。结果患者平均年龄44.47±15.32岁,男性占81.9%。其中43例因颈椎骨折脱位导致颈髓损伤,29例因颈椎管狭窄导致损伤。创伤的主要机制是跌倒,其次是机动车事故。C5椎体是最常见的骨折节段,C5/C6和C6/C7是最常见的脱位节段。损伤至手术减压的平均时间间隔为4.27±6.98天,平均住院时间为22.83±21.76天。平均随访时间43.83±14.43个月。统计分析显示两组患者在年龄、住院时间、创伤机制、临床表现、不完全性脊髓损伤状态、住院死亡率等方面存在显著差异。然而,结果-包括出院后死亡率和SF12 PCS和SF12 mcs评分-在两组之间没有显着差异。结论:本研究表明,与颈椎管狭窄患者相比,骨折脱位患者的短期预后(尤其是住院死亡率)更高,但前者的长期预后并不一定表明前者的死亡率或生活质量更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信