{"title":"Les effets du leadership laissez-faire et le rôle de l’estime de soi des employés","authors":"V. Robert , C. Vandenberghe","doi":"10.1016/j.pto.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Based on social exchange theory, this study examines the negative effects of supervisors’ laissez-faire leadership on the perceived quality of employee–supervisor relationships, normative commitment, and employee voice behavior. The study further considers employee self-esteem as a factor that can affect the work outcomes of interest and moderate the effects of laissez-faire leadership. Based on data collected from a sample of employees and their supervisors working in the service sector in the Quebec province (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->216), we observed that laissez-faire leadership was negatively associated with the quality of employee-supervisor relationships but was unrelated to normative commitment and employee voice behavior. Employee self-esteem was positively associated with the quality of employee–supervisor relationships and voice behavior. Moreover, employee self-esteem acted as a moderator of the effects of laissez-faire leadership such that laissez-faire leadership was negatively and significantly related to the quality of employee-supervisor relationships, normative commitment, and voice behavior, only when employee self-esteem was high. When employee self-esteem was low, the effects of laissez-faire leadership on the quality of employee–supervisor relationships and normative commitment were non-significant. However, interestingly, the effect of laissez-faire leadership on employee voice behavior was significant and positive. These results have important implications for the understanding of the effects of laissez-faire leadership in work organizations, on which we elaborate in the discussion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43191,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations","volume":"31 2","pages":"Pages 73-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1420253024000657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Based on social exchange theory, this study examines the negative effects of supervisors’ laissez-faire leadership on the perceived quality of employee–supervisor relationships, normative commitment, and employee voice behavior. The study further considers employee self-esteem as a factor that can affect the work outcomes of interest and moderate the effects of laissez-faire leadership. Based on data collected from a sample of employees and their supervisors working in the service sector in the Quebec province (n = 216), we observed that laissez-faire leadership was negatively associated with the quality of employee-supervisor relationships but was unrelated to normative commitment and employee voice behavior. Employee self-esteem was positively associated with the quality of employee–supervisor relationships and voice behavior. Moreover, employee self-esteem acted as a moderator of the effects of laissez-faire leadership such that laissez-faire leadership was negatively and significantly related to the quality of employee-supervisor relationships, normative commitment, and voice behavior, only when employee self-esteem was high. When employee self-esteem was low, the effects of laissez-faire leadership on the quality of employee–supervisor relationships and normative commitment were non-significant. However, interestingly, the effect of laissez-faire leadership on employee voice behavior was significant and positive. These results have important implications for the understanding of the effects of laissez-faire leadership in work organizations, on which we elaborate in the discussion.