Comparative phylogenetic analyses of RNA editing in fern plastomes suggest possible adaptive innovations.

IF 8.3 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
New Phytologist Pub Date : 2025-05-26 DOI:10.1111/nph.70244
Blake D Fauskee,Li-Yaung Kuo,Tracy A Heath,Pei-Jun Xie,Kathleen M Pryer
{"title":"Comparative phylogenetic analyses of RNA editing in fern plastomes suggest possible adaptive innovations.","authors":"Blake D Fauskee,Li-Yaung Kuo,Tracy A Heath,Pei-Jun Xie,Kathleen M Pryer","doi":"10.1111/nph.70244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RNA editing in plant organelles is widely regarded as a neutral corrective mechanism, yet it persists as a complex, energetically costly process, requiring numerous nuclear-encoded pentatricopeptide repeat proteins. Ferns are the most diverse lineage of land plants that uniquely retain both cytidine-to-uridine (C-to-U) and uridine-to-cytidine (U-to-C) Berget RNA editing in their plastomes, offering a powerful system to investigate the evolutionary forces shaping both editing types. Two distantly related fern lineages - Hymenophyllaceae and Vittarioideae (Pteridaceae) - each containing sister sublineages with contrasting evolutionary rates, were selected for comparative analysis. Genomic and transcriptomic data were combined with bioinformatic and phylogenetic methods to identify RNA editing sites and investigate the evolutionary dynamics of both C-to-U and U-to-C editing in fern plastomes. Nonsynonymous edits were frequently lost, consistent with neutral evolution. By contrast, C-to-U edits at start codons and U-to-C edits at internal stop codons were evolutionarily conserved, displaying lower and more variable editing efficiencies that suggest these edits are regulated. C-to-U edits at start codons and U-to-C edits at internal stop codons are evolutionarily conserved and exhibit signatures of selective regulation, suggesting that they function as molecular checkpoints. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that RNA editing in plants plays an adaptive role in modulating plastid gene expression.","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70244","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

RNA editing in plant organelles is widely regarded as a neutral corrective mechanism, yet it persists as a complex, energetically costly process, requiring numerous nuclear-encoded pentatricopeptide repeat proteins. Ferns are the most diverse lineage of land plants that uniquely retain both cytidine-to-uridine (C-to-U) and uridine-to-cytidine (U-to-C) Berget RNA editing in their plastomes, offering a powerful system to investigate the evolutionary forces shaping both editing types. Two distantly related fern lineages - Hymenophyllaceae and Vittarioideae (Pteridaceae) - each containing sister sublineages with contrasting evolutionary rates, were selected for comparative analysis. Genomic and transcriptomic data were combined with bioinformatic and phylogenetic methods to identify RNA editing sites and investigate the evolutionary dynamics of both C-to-U and U-to-C editing in fern plastomes. Nonsynonymous edits were frequently lost, consistent with neutral evolution. By contrast, C-to-U edits at start codons and U-to-C edits at internal stop codons were evolutionarily conserved, displaying lower and more variable editing efficiencies that suggest these edits are regulated. C-to-U edits at start codons and U-to-C edits at internal stop codons are evolutionarily conserved and exhibit signatures of selective regulation, suggesting that they function as molecular checkpoints. These findings provide the strongest evidence to date that RNA editing in plants plays an adaptive role in modulating plastid gene expression.
蕨类质体中RNA编辑的比较系统发育分析提示可能的适应性创新。
植物细胞器中的RNA编辑被广泛认为是一种中性的纠正机制,但它仍然是一个复杂的、能量昂贵的过程,需要许多核编码的五肽重复蛋白。蕨类植物是陆地植物中最多样化的谱系,它们在其质体中独特地保留了胞苷-尿苷(C-to-U)和尿苷-胞苷(U-to-C) Berget RNA编辑,提供了一个强大的系统来研究塑造这两种编辑类型的进化力量。两个远亲的蕨类谱系-膜ophyllaceae和Vittarioideae(蕨科)-每个都包含具有不同进化速率的姐妹亚谱系,被选中进行比较分析。基因组学和转录组学数据与生物信息学和系统发育方法相结合,鉴定RNA编辑位点,并研究蕨类质体中C-to-U和U-to-C编辑的进化动力学。非同义编辑经常丢失,与中性进化一致。相比之下,开始密码子的C-to-U编辑和内部停止密码子的U-to-C编辑在进化上是保守的,显示出更低和更可变的编辑效率,表明这些编辑是受调节的。开始密码子上的C-to-U编辑和内部停止密码子上的U-to-C编辑在进化上是保守的,并表现出选择性调控的特征,表明它们起着分子检查点的作用。这些发现提供了迄今为止最有力的证据,证明植物中的RNA编辑在调节质体基因表达方面起着适应性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist 生物-植物科学
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信