Aris T Papageorghiou,María C Restrepo-Méndez,Rose McGready,Fernando C Barros,Francois Nosten,Shama Munim,Roseline Ochieng,Rachel Craik,Hellen C Barsosio,James A Berkley,Maria Carvalho,Michelle Fernandes,Leila Cheikh Ismail,Ann Lambert,Shane A Norris,Eric O Ohuma,Alan Stein FRCPsych,Chrystelle O O Tshivuila-Matala,Adele Winsey,Zulfiqar A Bhutta,Stephen H Kennedy,Jose Villar
{"title":"Small for Gestational Age sub-groups have differential morbidity, growth and neurodevelopment at age 2: the INTERBIO-21st Newborn Study.","authors":"Aris T Papageorghiou,María C Restrepo-Méndez,Rose McGready,Fernando C Barros,Francois Nosten,Shama Munim,Roseline Ochieng,Rachel Craik,Hellen C Barsosio,James A Berkley,Maria Carvalho,Michelle Fernandes,Leila Cheikh Ismail,Ann Lambert,Shane A Norris,Eric O Ohuma,Alan Stein FRCPsych,Chrystelle O O Tshivuila-Matala,Adele Winsey,Zulfiqar A Bhutta,Stephen H Kennedy,Jose Villar","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.05.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nSmall for Gestational Age (SGA) is a complex perinatal syndrome associated with increased neonatal morbidity, mortality, and impaired childhood growth and neurodevelopment. Current classifications rely primarily on birth weight, which does not capture the heterogeneity of the condition nor predict long-term health outcomes. Here we aim to identify and characterise distinct SGA sub-groups and assess their neonatal and early childhood health trajectories.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVES\r\nTo refine the classification of SGA by identifying sub-groups based on maternal, fetal, and environmental factors and evaluating their associations with neonatal morbidity, growth, and neurodevelopment at age 2.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nProspective Cohort Study. In six countries worldwide, between 2012 and 2018, the INTERBIO-21st Study enrolled SGA and non-SGA newborns defined by the <10th centile of international standards with moderate (≥3rd to <10th centile) and severe (<3rd centile) SGA sub-groups; we assessed their growth, health, nutrition, motor development, and neurodevelopment up to age 2. We used 2-step cluster analysis to identify SGA sub-groups, and a probabilistic approach to choose the optimal sub-group model based on a statistical measure of fit. We performed logistic regression analysis (OR; 95% CI) to assess health and development outcomes among sub-groups using the non-SGA as reference group, adjusting for key confounders.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe enrolled 5153 non-SGA and 1549 SGA newborns: moderate (≥3rd to <10th centile) SGA=947 and severe (<3rd centile) SGA=602). We identified nine SGA sub-groups: 'no main condition detected' (29.0%); 'previous low birth weight (LBW)/preterm birth (PTB)' (14.6%); 'severe maternal disease' (12.0%); 'maternal short stature (11.6%); 'hypertensive disorders' (9.6%); 'extrauterine infection' (6.8%); 'previous miscarriage(s)' (6.5%); 'smoking' (5.2%), and 'maternal under-nutrition' (4.7%). Severe SGA newborns in the 'severe maternal disease' (OR: 3.2; 95% CI, 1.8-6.0), 'previous LBW/PTB' (OR: 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6-4.8), and 'smoking' (OR: 5.4; 95% CI, 1.3-21.8) sub-groups had increased risk of neonatal and long-term morbidity, and low anthropometric measures at age 2 as compared to the non-SGA group. Moderate SGA newborns in the \"hypertensive disorders\" sub-group had increased risk of neonatal morbidity (OR: 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-4.6), and higher odds of scoring <10th centile of normative values in language (OR: 3.5; 95%CI, 1.0-12.0) and positive behavior (OR: 2.2; 95%CI, 1.1-4.5). The 'severe maternal disease' sub-group had also higher risk of deficit (<10th centile of normative values) in language (OR: 5.7; 95%CI, 1.3-24.8), positive behavior (OR: 3.4; 95%CI, 1.5-7.6).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nSGA comprises heterogeneous sub-groups with distinct patterns of neonatal morbidity, postnatal growth, and neurodevelopmental outcomes up to age 2.","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"133 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.05.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Small for Gestational Age (SGA) is a complex perinatal syndrome associated with increased neonatal morbidity, mortality, and impaired childhood growth and neurodevelopment. Current classifications rely primarily on birth weight, which does not capture the heterogeneity of the condition nor predict long-term health outcomes. Here we aim to identify and characterise distinct SGA sub-groups and assess their neonatal and early childhood health trajectories.
OBJECTIVES
To refine the classification of SGA by identifying sub-groups based on maternal, fetal, and environmental factors and evaluating their associations with neonatal morbidity, growth, and neurodevelopment at age 2.
STUDY DESIGN
Prospective Cohort Study. In six countries worldwide, between 2012 and 2018, the INTERBIO-21st Study enrolled SGA and non-SGA newborns defined by the <10th centile of international standards with moderate (≥3rd to <10th centile) and severe (<3rd centile) SGA sub-groups; we assessed their growth, health, nutrition, motor development, and neurodevelopment up to age 2. We used 2-step cluster analysis to identify SGA sub-groups, and a probabilistic approach to choose the optimal sub-group model based on a statistical measure of fit. We performed logistic regression analysis (OR; 95% CI) to assess health and development outcomes among sub-groups using the non-SGA as reference group, adjusting for key confounders.
RESULTS
We enrolled 5153 non-SGA and 1549 SGA newborns: moderate (≥3rd to <10th centile) SGA=947 and severe (<3rd centile) SGA=602). We identified nine SGA sub-groups: 'no main condition detected' (29.0%); 'previous low birth weight (LBW)/preterm birth (PTB)' (14.6%); 'severe maternal disease' (12.0%); 'maternal short stature (11.6%); 'hypertensive disorders' (9.6%); 'extrauterine infection' (6.8%); 'previous miscarriage(s)' (6.5%); 'smoking' (5.2%), and 'maternal under-nutrition' (4.7%). Severe SGA newborns in the 'severe maternal disease' (OR: 3.2; 95% CI, 1.8-6.0), 'previous LBW/PTB' (OR: 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6-4.8), and 'smoking' (OR: 5.4; 95% CI, 1.3-21.8) sub-groups had increased risk of neonatal and long-term morbidity, and low anthropometric measures at age 2 as compared to the non-SGA group. Moderate SGA newborns in the "hypertensive disorders" sub-group had increased risk of neonatal morbidity (OR: 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-4.6), and higher odds of scoring <10th centile of normative values in language (OR: 3.5; 95%CI, 1.0-12.0) and positive behavior (OR: 2.2; 95%CI, 1.1-4.5). The 'severe maternal disease' sub-group had also higher risk of deficit (<10th centile of normative values) in language (OR: 5.7; 95%CI, 1.3-24.8), positive behavior (OR: 3.4; 95%CI, 1.5-7.6).
CONCLUSIONS
SGA comprises heterogeneous sub-groups with distinct patterns of neonatal morbidity, postnatal growth, and neurodevelopmental outcomes up to age 2.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare.
Focus Areas:
Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders.
Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases.
Content Types:
Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles.
Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology.
Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field.
Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews.
Peer Review Process:
All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.