EXPRESS: No wrap-up effect in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements.

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Jin Xue, Yaqian Borogjoon Bao, Dongcheng Xie, Guangpu Chen, Victor Kuperman
{"title":"EXPRESS: No wrap-up effect in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements.","authors":"Jin Xue, Yaqian Borogjoon Bao, Dongcheng Xie, Guangpu Chen, Victor Kuperman","doi":"10.1177/17470218251347264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research conducted on alphabetic languages has yielded findings suggesting that readers tend to allocate more time towards processing the final words of a sentence or clause, commonly referred to as the wrap-up effect. Several theoretical accounts of the wrap-up effect advocate causal mechanisms that are supposed to generalize over readers of all languages yet are based on a small selection of written languages and writing systems. Whether the wrap-up effect occurs in naturally unspaced, logographic languages such as Chinese remains unclear. We carried out an eye movement study focused on simplified Chinese reading, intending to discern whether the wrap-up effect at the end of the sentence is modulated by visual complexity. Native readers of Mandarin Chinese were tasked with reading sentences featuring target words manipulated in terms of visual complexity (high vs. low) and word position (final or medial) in the sentence. We found that words at the end of sentences were processed as quickly or even faster than those in the sentence-medial position depending on the eye-movement measure, and that the complexity of characters did not affect the wrap-up effect. This reversed or null wrap-up effect calls for a revision of proposed theoretical accounts grounded in the processing of alphabetic languages. The findings suggest that sentence processing in simplified Chinese is highly incremental, and the information-theoretical account is the one that does not contradict the observed direction of the wrap-up effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251347264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251347264","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research conducted on alphabetic languages has yielded findings suggesting that readers tend to allocate more time towards processing the final words of a sentence or clause, commonly referred to as the wrap-up effect. Several theoretical accounts of the wrap-up effect advocate causal mechanisms that are supposed to generalize over readers of all languages yet are based on a small selection of written languages and writing systems. Whether the wrap-up effect occurs in naturally unspaced, logographic languages such as Chinese remains unclear. We carried out an eye movement study focused on simplified Chinese reading, intending to discern whether the wrap-up effect at the end of the sentence is modulated by visual complexity. Native readers of Mandarin Chinese were tasked with reading sentences featuring target words manipulated in terms of visual complexity (high vs. low) and word position (final or medial) in the sentence. We found that words at the end of sentences were processed as quickly or even faster than those in the sentence-medial position depending on the eye-movement measure, and that the complexity of characters did not affect the wrap-up effect. This reversed or null wrap-up effect calls for a revision of proposed theoretical accounts grounded in the processing of alphabetic languages. The findings suggest that sentence processing in simplified Chinese is highly incremental, and the information-theoretical account is the one that does not contradict the observed direction of the wrap-up effect.

中国阅读中没有概括效应:来自眼球运动的证据。
对字母语言进行的研究发现,读者倾向于花更多的时间来处理句子或从句的最后一个词,这通常被称为总结效应。总结效应的几个理论解释主张因果机制,这些机制应该适用于所有语言的读者,但却基于一小部分书面语言和书写系统。这种总结效应是否会发生在像汉语这样的自然无间隔的符号语言中尚不清楚。本研究以简体中文阅读为对象进行眼动研究,目的是了解句子结尾的总结效应是否受到视觉复杂性的调节。母语为普通话的读者被要求阅读一些句子,这些句子的目标词是根据视觉复杂性(高或低)和单词在句子中的位置(尾或中间)进行操纵的。我们发现,根据眼动测量,句尾单词的处理速度与句子中间位置的单词一样快,甚至更快,并且字符的复杂性不影响总结效果。这种反向或无效的总结效应要求对基于字母语言处理的理论解释进行修订。研究结果表明,简体汉语的句子加工具有高度的增量性,信息理论解释与所观察到的概括效应方向并不矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信