Health economic evaluations of diagnostic tests for tuberculosis: a narrative review.

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Cemre Arpa, Ahmed Abd El Wahed, Serap Aydin, Prakash Ghosh, Dinesh Mondal, Lydia Nakiyingi, Julius Boniface Okuni, Sophie Schneitler, Manfred Weidmann, Martin Siegel
{"title":"Health economic evaluations of diagnostic tests for tuberculosis: a narrative review.","authors":"Cemre Arpa, Ahmed Abd El Wahed, Serap Aydin, Prakash Ghosh, Dinesh Mondal, Lydia Nakiyingi, Julius Boniface Okuni, Sophie Schneitler, Manfred Weidmann, Martin Siegel","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00639-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculosis is the leading cause of death from infectious diseases globally. Non-specific symptoms and limitations of existing diagnostics involve challenges for informed policymaking and clinical practice. This paper reviews common practices in reporting the selection and definition of cost and effect parameters, and in reporting the translation of effect parameters into utility and disability weights, in health economic evaluations of TB diagnostic tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A targeted literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar identified health economic evaluations of diagnosis and population screening strategies for TB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 28 studies comprising 11 cost-effectiveness and 17 cost-utility analyses. Observed patient data were used in 6 studies, 22 relied solely on model-based evaluations. Variations in prevalence, accuracy, and utility parameters were common, the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards terminology for costing was only used in 8 out of 28 studies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Future studies should state the exact type of TB studied, as it can manifest in multiple organs, remain inactive for long periods of time, and since different diagnostics can perform differently depending on the site involved it may influence test accuracies. Additionally, potential impacts of sequential diagnostics on test accuracy and the cost of inaction should receive more attention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Precise terminology and transparent definitions of parameters and methodology in health economics evaluations are necessary to generate evidence that guides policymakers and supports clinical decision-making in the context of TB.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00639-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis is the leading cause of death from infectious diseases globally. Non-specific symptoms and limitations of existing diagnostics involve challenges for informed policymaking and clinical practice. This paper reviews common practices in reporting the selection and definition of cost and effect parameters, and in reporting the translation of effect parameters into utility and disability weights, in health economic evaluations of TB diagnostic tests.

Methods: A targeted literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar identified health economic evaluations of diagnosis and population screening strategies for TB.

Results: We found 28 studies comprising 11 cost-effectiveness and 17 cost-utility analyses. Observed patient data were used in 6 studies, 22 relied solely on model-based evaluations. Variations in prevalence, accuracy, and utility parameters were common, the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards terminology for costing was only used in 8 out of 28 studies.

Discussion: Future studies should state the exact type of TB studied, as it can manifest in multiple organs, remain inactive for long periods of time, and since different diagnostics can perform differently depending on the site involved it may influence test accuracies. Additionally, potential impacts of sequential diagnostics on test accuracy and the cost of inaction should receive more attention.

Conclusion: Precise terminology and transparent definitions of parameters and methodology in health economics evaluations are necessary to generate evidence that guides policymakers and supports clinical decision-making in the context of TB.

结核病诊断试验的卫生经济评价:叙述性回顾。
背景:结核病是全球传染病死亡的主要原因。非特异性症状和现有诊断的局限性给知情决策和临床实践带来挑战。本文综述了在结核病诊断检测的卫生经济评估中报告成本和效果参数的选择和定义以及报告将效果参数转化为效用和残疾权重的常见做法。方法:在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar中进行有针对性的文献检索,确定结核病诊断和人群筛查策略的健康经济评估。结果:我们发现了28项研究,包括11项成本-效果分析和17项成本-效用分析。6项研究使用了观察到的患者数据,22项研究仅依赖基于模型的评估。流行率、准确性和效用参数的变化很常见,28项研究中只有8项使用了综合卫生经济评估报告标准的成本计算术语。讨论:未来的研究应该说明所研究的结核病的确切类型,因为它可以在多个器官中表现出来,在很长一段时间内保持不活跃,而且由于不同的诊断可能根据所涉及的部位而不同,这可能会影响检测的准确性。此外,顺序诊断对测试准确性的潜在影响和不作为的代价应该得到更多的关注。结论:在结核病背景下,卫生经济学评估中需要精确的术语和透明的参数和方法定义,以产生指导决策者和支持临床决策的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信