{"title":"Bridging Genomic Research Disparities in Osteoporosis GWAS: Insights for Diverse Populations.","authors":"Qing Wu, Jingyuan Dai, Jianing Liu, Lang Wu","doi":"10.1007/s11914-025-00917-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have significantly advanced osteoporosis research by identifying genetic loci associated with bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk. However, disparities persist due to the underrepresentation of non-European populations, limiting the applicability of polygenic risk scores (PRS). This review examines recent advancements in osteoporosis genetics, highlights existing disparities, and explores strategies for more inclusive research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>European-focused GWAS have identified key loci for osteoporosis, including WNT signaling (SOST, LRP5) and RUNX2 transcriptional regulation. However, fewer than 40% of these variants can be replicated in Asian and African populations. Emerging studies in non-European groups reveal population-specific loci, sex-specific associations, and gene-environment interactions. Advances in machine learning (ML)-assisted GWAS and multi-omics integration are improving genetic discovery. Expanding GWAS in diverse populations, integrating multi-omics data, refining ML-based risk models, and standardizing biobank data are essential for equitable osteoporosis research. Future efforts must prioritize clinical translation to enhance personalized osteoporosis prevention and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48750,"journal":{"name":"Current Osteoporosis Reports","volume":"23 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Osteoporosis Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-025-00917-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have significantly advanced osteoporosis research by identifying genetic loci associated with bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk. However, disparities persist due to the underrepresentation of non-European populations, limiting the applicability of polygenic risk scores (PRS). This review examines recent advancements in osteoporosis genetics, highlights existing disparities, and explores strategies for more inclusive research.
Recent findings: European-focused GWAS have identified key loci for osteoporosis, including WNT signaling (SOST, LRP5) and RUNX2 transcriptional regulation. However, fewer than 40% of these variants can be replicated in Asian and African populations. Emerging studies in non-European groups reveal population-specific loci, sex-specific associations, and gene-environment interactions. Advances in machine learning (ML)-assisted GWAS and multi-omics integration are improving genetic discovery. Expanding GWAS in diverse populations, integrating multi-omics data, refining ML-based risk models, and standardizing biobank data are essential for equitable osteoporosis research. Future efforts must prioritize clinical translation to enhance personalized osteoporosis prevention and treatment.
期刊介绍:
This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of osteoporosis.
We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as current and future therapeutics, epidemiology and pathophysiology, and evaluation and management. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.