Hindi Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire on Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.

Akanksha Chaurasiya, Jay Kumar Ranjan, Nityanand Pandey, Hari Shanker Asthana
{"title":"Hindi Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire on Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Akanksha Chaurasiya, Jay Kumar Ranjan, Nityanand Pandey, Hari Shanker Asthana","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acaf039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPCSQ) is a widely used tool for assessing the pattern and severity of post-head injury symptoms, and has been translated and validated in various languages. However, a Hindi version of this questionnaire is not yet available. Therefore, the present study aimed to adapt the RPCSQ into Hindi and examine its factorial structure along with its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The original English version of RPCSQ was adapted into Hindi by using the cross-cultural adaptation process. The final adapted Hindi version of RPCSQ (RPCSQ-H) was administered on traumatic brain injury (TBI) participants to assess its reliability, factor structure, discriminant validity, construct validity, and temporal stability of scale.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The psychometric evaluation of the scale yielded an acceptable Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.768. The temporal stability of RPCSQ-H was significant at the acute stage, with test-retest coefficients of 0.713 and 0.615 after 7 days and 14 days, respectively. Additionally, the results supported a six-factor model of the RPCSQ-H with good convergent validity, factor reliability, and discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RPCSQ-H demonstrates strong reliability and validity along with good psychometric to assess post-head injury symptoms in Hindi-speaking patients with TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPCSQ) is a widely used tool for assessing the pattern and severity of post-head injury symptoms, and has been translated and validated in various languages. However, a Hindi version of this questionnaire is not yet available. Therefore, the present study aimed to adapt the RPCSQ into Hindi and examine its factorial structure along with its psychometric properties.

Method: The original English version of RPCSQ was adapted into Hindi by using the cross-cultural adaptation process. The final adapted Hindi version of RPCSQ (RPCSQ-H) was administered on traumatic brain injury (TBI) participants to assess its reliability, factor structure, discriminant validity, construct validity, and temporal stability of scale.

Result: The psychometric evaluation of the scale yielded an acceptable Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.768. The temporal stability of RPCSQ-H was significant at the acute stage, with test-retest coefficients of 0.713 and 0.615 after 7 days and 14 days, respectively. Additionally, the results supported a six-factor model of the RPCSQ-H with good convergent validity, factor reliability, and discriminant validity.

Conclusion: The RPCSQ-H demonstrates strong reliability and validity along with good psychometric to assess post-head injury symptoms in Hindi-speaking patients with TBI.

外伤性脑损伤患者Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷的印地语适应与心理测量学验证。
背景:Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷(RPCSQ)是一种广泛使用的评估头部损伤后症状模式和严重程度的工具,已被翻译成多种语言并经过验证。然而,目前还没有印度语版的问卷。因此,本研究旨在将RPCSQ调整为印地语,并研究其析因结构及其心理测量特性。方法:采用跨文化改编的方法,将原英文RPCSQ翻译成印地语。对外伤性脑损伤(TBI)被试进行最终版RPCSQ (RPCSQ- h)的信度、因子结构、判别效度、构念效度和时间稳定性评估。结果:量表的心理测量评价Cronbach's α系数为0.768,具有可接受性。RPCSQ-H在急性期的时间稳定性显著,7 d和14 d后的重测系数分别为0.713和0.615。结果支持RPCSQ-H具有较好的收敛效度、因子信度和判别效度的六因子模型。结论:RPCSQ-H量表具有较强的信度和效度,能较好地评估印地语脑外伤患者的脑损伤后症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信