In Vivo Reductions in Methane and Urinary Nitrogen by Perennial Non-Bloating Temperate Legume and Forb Functional Forages Produced in the Mountain West United States

IF 2.9 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Jennifer W. MacAdam, Juan J. Villalba, Sebastian Lagrange, Elizabeth K. Stewart, Lance R. Pitcher, Kathryn A. Slebodnik, Jeanette M. Norton, Jennifer R. Reeve, Yunhua Zhang, Andrea I. Bolletta, Jerrad F. Legako, Rachael G. Christensen, Sara R. Hunt
{"title":"In Vivo Reductions in Methane and Urinary Nitrogen by Perennial Non-Bloating Temperate Legume and Forb Functional Forages Produced in the Mountain West United States","authors":"Jennifer W. MacAdam,&nbsp;Juan J. Villalba,&nbsp;Sebastian Lagrange,&nbsp;Elizabeth K. Stewart,&nbsp;Lance R. Pitcher,&nbsp;Kathryn A. Slebodnik,&nbsp;Jeanette M. Norton,&nbsp;Jennifer R. Reeve,&nbsp;Yunhua Zhang,&nbsp;Andrea I. Bolletta,&nbsp;Jerrad F. Legako,&nbsp;Rachael G. Christensen,&nbsp;Sara R. Hunt","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ruminant livestock production is the greatest source of agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) production, largely due to enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions. While the optimised feed rations used in confinement dairy and beef finishing operations can reduce CH<sub>4</sub> emissions of individual animals compared with cattle on forage diets, the profitability of beef cowherds and grazing-based dairies rests on controlling the input costs, most notably feed. Grazing is the least costly feed source, and we have studied the management of non-bloating, nutrient-dense perennial forages with the goal of maximising benefits to ruminants, the environment, producers, and consumers. The naturally alkaline soils, dry climate, long sunny days, and cool nights of the Mountain West United States are favourable for the productivity and persistence of perennial legumes. While alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.) is the highest-value cash crop in the western United States, it is not routinely used for grazing due to the likelihood of bloat. Relative to cattle grazing cool-season grass pastures, cattle grazing sainfoin (<i>Onobrychis viciifolia</i> Scop.), birdsfoot trefoil (<i>Lotus corniculatus</i> L.), and cicer milkvetch (<i>Astragalus cicer</i> L.) had greater intake, production, and lower urinary nitrogen. As a function of intake, the enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions of cows, heifers, and calves grazing these legume pastures were reduced 25%–63% compared with the same cattle on grass pastures, and heifers grazing legume pastures had CH<sub>4</sub> emissions no different from heifers on total mixed rations. We integrate these observations of temperate perennial forage legumes and forbs with the wider literature to identify promising traits and species.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.12719","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12719","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ruminant livestock production is the greatest source of agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) production, largely due to enteric methane (CH4) emissions. While the optimised feed rations used in confinement dairy and beef finishing operations can reduce CH4 emissions of individual animals compared with cattle on forage diets, the profitability of beef cowherds and grazing-based dairies rests on controlling the input costs, most notably feed. Grazing is the least costly feed source, and we have studied the management of non-bloating, nutrient-dense perennial forages with the goal of maximising benefits to ruminants, the environment, producers, and consumers. The naturally alkaline soils, dry climate, long sunny days, and cool nights of the Mountain West United States are favourable for the productivity and persistence of perennial legumes. While alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is the highest-value cash crop in the western United States, it is not routinely used for grazing due to the likelihood of bloat. Relative to cattle grazing cool-season grass pastures, cattle grazing sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.), birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.), and cicer milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.) had greater intake, production, and lower urinary nitrogen. As a function of intake, the enteric CH4 emissions of cows, heifers, and calves grazing these legume pastures were reduced 25%–63% compared with the same cattle on grass pastures, and heifers grazing legume pastures had CH4 emissions no different from heifers on total mixed rations. We integrate these observations of temperate perennial forage legumes and forbs with the wider literature to identify promising traits and species.

Abstract Image

美国西部山区生产的多年生不胀气的温带豆科植物和牧草功能饲料体内甲烷和尿氮的减少
反刍家畜生产是农业温室气体(GHG)生产的最大来源,主要是由于肠道甲烷(CH4)排放。虽然与使用饲料的牛相比,在封闭奶牛和牛肉肥育作业中使用的优化饲料口粮可以减少单个动物的甲烷排放,但肉牛和放牧奶牛的盈利能力取决于控制投入成本,尤其是饲料成本。放牧是成本最低的饲料来源,我们研究了不胀气、营养丰富的多年生牧草的管理,目标是使反刍动物、环境、生产者和消费者的利益最大化。美国西部山区的天然碱性土壤、干燥的气候、漫长的晴天和凉爽的夜晚有利于多年生豆科植物的生产力和持久性。虽然苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)是美国西部价值最高的经济作物,但由于可能膨胀,它不经常用于放牧。与放牧冷季牧草的牛相比,放牧红豆草(Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.)、鸟足三叶草(Lotus corniculatus L.)和黄芪(Astragalus cicer L.)的牛摄入、产量更高,尿氮含量更低。作为采食量的函数,放牧豆科牧草的牛、母牛和犊牛的肠道CH4排放量比放牧牧草的牛减少了25% ~ 63%,放牧豆科牧草的母牛的CH4排放量与全混合饲料的母牛没有差异。我们将这些温带多年生牧草、豆科植物和草本植物的观察结果与更广泛的文献相结合,以确定有希望的性状和物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信