Physiological and Canopy Traits of Two Perennial Arachis Species in Response to Clipping Height

IF 2.9 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Theyson D. Maranhão, Fagner J. Gomes, Junior I. Yasuoka, Bruno C. Pedreira, Cristiam Bosi, Patricia M. Santos, Rogério Furlan Junior, Carlos G. S. Pedreira
{"title":"Physiological and Canopy Traits of Two Perennial Arachis Species in Response to Clipping Height","authors":"Theyson D. Maranhão,&nbsp;Fagner J. Gomes,&nbsp;Junior I. Yasuoka,&nbsp;Bruno C. Pedreira,&nbsp;Cristiam Bosi,&nbsp;Patricia M. Santos,&nbsp;Rogério Furlan Junior,&nbsp;Carlos G. S. Pedreira","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>‘Belmonte’ pinto peanut (PP; <i>Arachis pintoi</i> Krapov. W. C. &amp; Greg cv. Belmonte) and ‘Florigraze’ rhizoma peanut (RP; <i>Arachis glabrata</i> Benth cv. Florigraze) are two perennial peanut species used as forages in tropical and subtropical regions. They contrast in their physiology and productivity, but information is lacking on how this contrast impacts responses to stubble height. Our objective was to assess the impact of stubble height on the physiological and productive responses as expressed by the total herbage accumulation and leaflet accumulation rate, leaf photosynthesis rate and stomatal conductance of PP and RP. Herbage was harvested every 42 days at 4- and 8-cm stubble heights during both warm and cool seasons under irrigation, for a total of 1096 days in Piracicaba, Brazil. In the warm season, RP had a lesser leaflet photosynthesis rate than PP (<i>A</i>, 33 vs. 36 μmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> leaf s<sup>−1</sup>), as well as lesser stomatal conductance (<i>gs</i>, 0.64 vs. 0.88 mol H<sub>2</sub>O m<sup>−2</sup> leaf s<sup>−1</sup>). Belmonte pinto peanut had herbage accumulation rate (HAR) 52% greater than RP (53 vs. 35 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>). In the cool season, RP also exhibited lesser <i>A</i> (25 vs. 34 μmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> leaf s<sup>−1</sup>), and lesser <i>gs</i> (0.64 vs. 0.91 mol H<sub>2</sub>O m<sup>−2</sup> leaf s<sup>−1</sup>). The 4-cm stubble resulted in greater leaflet accumulation rate and herbage accumulation rate and under the 8 cm stubble there was greater CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation, potentially improving long-term regrowth. Leaflet physiological responses of RP limited HAR, especially during the cool season. Belmonte pinto peanut performed better than RP at our location regardless of stubble height and season. These responses support PP as a better option for pasture diversification in sustainable animal production systems in southeastern Brazil.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12721","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

‘Belmonte’ pinto peanut (PP; Arachis pintoi Krapov. W. C. & Greg cv. Belmonte) and ‘Florigraze’ rhizoma peanut (RP; Arachis glabrata Benth cv. Florigraze) are two perennial peanut species used as forages in tropical and subtropical regions. They contrast in their physiology and productivity, but information is lacking on how this contrast impacts responses to stubble height. Our objective was to assess the impact of stubble height on the physiological and productive responses as expressed by the total herbage accumulation and leaflet accumulation rate, leaf photosynthesis rate and stomatal conductance of PP and RP. Herbage was harvested every 42 days at 4- and 8-cm stubble heights during both warm and cool seasons under irrigation, for a total of 1096 days in Piracicaba, Brazil. In the warm season, RP had a lesser leaflet photosynthesis rate than PP (A, 33 vs. 36 μmol CO2 m−2 leaf s−1), as well as lesser stomatal conductance (gs, 0.64 vs. 0.88 mol H2O m−2 leaf s−1). Belmonte pinto peanut had herbage accumulation rate (HAR) 52% greater than RP (53 vs. 35 kg ha−1 d−1). In the cool season, RP also exhibited lesser A (25 vs. 34 μmol CO2 m−2 leaf s−1), and lesser gs (0.64 vs. 0.91 mol H2O m−2 leaf s−1). The 4-cm stubble resulted in greater leaflet accumulation rate and herbage accumulation rate and under the 8 cm stubble there was greater CO2 assimilation, potentially improving long-term regrowth. Leaflet physiological responses of RP limited HAR, especially during the cool season. Belmonte pinto peanut performed better than RP at our location regardless of stubble height and season. These responses support PP as a better option for pasture diversification in sustainable animal production systems in southeastern Brazil.

两种多年生花生生理及冠层性状对剪枝高度的响应
“贝尔蒙特”平托花生(PP;阿拉奇·平托伊·克拉波夫。W. C. &;格雷格简历。Belmonte)和‘ Florigraze ’根茎花生(RP;板栗;花花生(Florigraze)是热带和亚热带地区用作饲料的两种多年生花生。它们在生理和生产力方面存在差异,但缺乏关于这种差异如何影响对残茬高度的反应的信息。我们的目的是评估残茬高度对PP和RP的生理和生产反应的影响,包括总牧草积累量和小叶积累速率、叶片光合速率和气孔导度。在巴西皮拉西卡巴,在暖季和冷季灌溉下,每42天收获一次4和8厘米茬高的牧草,共计1096天。在暖季,RP的叶片光合速率低于PP (a, 33 μmol CO2 m−2叶s−1比36 μmol CO2 m−2叶s−1),气孔导度也低于PP (g, 0.64 μmol H2O m−2叶s−1比0.88 mol H2O m−2叶s−1)。贝尔蒙特平托花生的牧草积累率(HAR)比RP高52%(53比35 kg ha - 1 d - 1)。在凉爽季节,RP也表现出较小的A (25 μmol CO2 m−2叶片s−1比34 μmol CO2 m−2)和较小的gs (0.64 μmol H2O m−2叶片s−1比0.91 mol H2O m−2)。4 cm的留茬能提高小叶积累速率和牧草积累速率,8 cm的留茬能提高CO2同化,有利于长期再生。RP的生理反应限制了HAR,特别是在凉爽季节。无论茬高和季节如何,贝尔蒙特平托花生在本地点的表现优于RP。这些反应表明,在巴西东南部的可持续动物生产系统中,PP是牧场多样化的更好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信