Less can be more: The case for extended dosing intervals in biologic therapy for AD

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Christian Vestergaard
{"title":"Less can be more: The case for extended dosing intervals in biologic therapy for AD","authors":"Christian Vestergaard","doi":"10.1111/jdv.20684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, debilitating and intensely pruritic eczematous disease. Until recently, treatment options were largely limited to topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors. In cases of severe and refractory disease, systemic immunosuppressants such as cyclosporine A—the only licensed systemic drug for AD—methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate and short-term oral glucocorticoids were used.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>The introduction of biologics targeting the interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13 pathway has revolutionized AD treatment. Dupilumab, which inhibits the IL-4 receptor-α (also part of the IL-13 receptor complex), as well as Tralokinumab and Lebrikizumab, both anti-IL-13 antibodies, have significantly expanded the therapeutic armamentarium and improved treatment efficacy.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Phases 2 and 3 clinical trials for these biologics evaluated various dosing regimens, leading to their current approval with fixed biweekly dosing intervals following an initial loading dose—Dupilumab and Tralokinumab are administered every 2 weeks, whereas Lebrikizumab transitions from biweekly dosing to a 4-week interval after 24 weeks of treatment.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>However, these trials also included patients randomized to alternative dosing schedules, some of whom achieved comparable treatment success, as measured by EASI-75 (Eczema Area and Severity Index) and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores of 0 or 1.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Additionally, emerging real-world evidence suggests that certain patients may maintain disease control with extended dosing intervals, potentially optimizing treatment burden and cost-effectiveness.</p><p>The transition from classical immunomodulators to biologics has been previously described. However, individualized dosing of biologics for AD patients has received little attention until now.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The guiding principle for medication use in treating any disease or patient should be to prescribe as much as necessary but as little as possible. This approach minimizes side effects and patient discomfort while keeping treatment costs low, all while ensuring therapeutic goals are met.</p><p>In their paper, Jacobson et al.<span><sup>5</sup></span> review the literature on dosing intervals for biologics in atopic dermatitis, specifically exploring the potential for extending these intervals. Using data from the LIBERTY-AD SOLO studies (Dupilumab), ECZTRA 1 and 2 (Tralokinumab), ADVOCATE 1 and 2 (Lebrikizumab) and real-world evidence, they assess both the feasibility of prolonged dosing and the patient profiles most suitable for this approach.</p><p>Their analysis suggests that dosing intervals can be extended in up to half of patients undergoing biologic therapy. Moreover, if treatment efficacy declines, reverting to the original dosing schedule typically restores disease control. These findings could significantly impact our daily treatment strategies for atopic dermatitis.</p><p>CV has received honoraria, served on add boards and/or received funding from Abbvie, Almirall, Sanofi, Leo Pharma, Pfizer and Pierre Fabre.</p>","PeriodicalId":17351,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":"39 6","pages":"1070-1071"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jdv.20684","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdv.20684","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, debilitating and intensely pruritic eczematous disease. Until recently, treatment options were largely limited to topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors. In cases of severe and refractory disease, systemic immunosuppressants such as cyclosporine A—the only licensed systemic drug for AD—methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate and short-term oral glucocorticoids were used.1

The introduction of biologics targeting the interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13 pathway has revolutionized AD treatment. Dupilumab, which inhibits the IL-4 receptor-α (also part of the IL-13 receptor complex), as well as Tralokinumab and Lebrikizumab, both anti-IL-13 antibodies, have significantly expanded the therapeutic armamentarium and improved treatment efficacy.2 Phases 2 and 3 clinical trials for these biologics evaluated various dosing regimens, leading to their current approval with fixed biweekly dosing intervals following an initial loading dose—Dupilumab and Tralokinumab are administered every 2 weeks, whereas Lebrikizumab transitions from biweekly dosing to a 4-week interval after 24 weeks of treatment.3

However, these trials also included patients randomized to alternative dosing schedules, some of whom achieved comparable treatment success, as measured by EASI-75 (Eczema Area and Severity Index) and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores of 0 or 1.3 Additionally, emerging real-world evidence suggests that certain patients may maintain disease control with extended dosing intervals, potentially optimizing treatment burden and cost-effectiveness.

The transition from classical immunomodulators to biologics has been previously described. However, individualized dosing of biologics for AD patients has received little attention until now.4 The guiding principle for medication use in treating any disease or patient should be to prescribe as much as necessary but as little as possible. This approach minimizes side effects and patient discomfort while keeping treatment costs low, all while ensuring therapeutic goals are met.

In their paper, Jacobson et al.5 review the literature on dosing intervals for biologics in atopic dermatitis, specifically exploring the potential for extending these intervals. Using data from the LIBERTY-AD SOLO studies (Dupilumab), ECZTRA 1 and 2 (Tralokinumab), ADVOCATE 1 and 2 (Lebrikizumab) and real-world evidence, they assess both the feasibility of prolonged dosing and the patient profiles most suitable for this approach.

Their analysis suggests that dosing intervals can be extended in up to half of patients undergoing biologic therapy. Moreover, if treatment efficacy declines, reverting to the original dosing schedule typically restores disease control. These findings could significantly impact our daily treatment strategies for atopic dermatitis.

CV has received honoraria, served on add boards and/or received funding from Abbvie, Almirall, Sanofi, Leo Pharma, Pfizer and Pierre Fabre.

少即是多:延长阿尔茨海默病生物治疗给药间隔的案例
特应性皮炎(AD)是一种慢性,衰弱和强烈瘙痒性湿疹疾病。直到最近,治疗选择主要局限于局部皮质类固醇和局部钙调磷酸酶抑制剂。在严重和难治性疾病的病例中,使用全身免疫抑制剂,如环孢素a(唯一被许可用于ad -甲氨蝶呤、硫唑嘌呤、霉酚酸盐的全身药物)和短期口服糖皮质激素。针对白细胞介素(IL)-4/IL-13通路的生物制剂的引入彻底改变了阿尔茨海默病的治疗。Dupilumab抑制IL-4受体-α(也是IL-13受体复合物的一部分),以及Tralokinumab和Lebrikizumab均为抗IL-13抗体,已显着扩大了治疗范围并提高了治疗效果这些生物制剂的2期和3期临床试验评估了各种给药方案,导致目前批准在初始负荷剂量后采用固定的双周给药间隔- dupilumab和Tralokinumab每2周给药一次,而Lebrikizumab在治疗24周后从双周给药转变为4周间隔。然而,这些试验也包括随机分配到替代给药方案的患者,其中一些患者取得了类似的治疗成功,根据EASI-75(湿疹面积和严重程度指数)和研究者全球评估(IGA)评分为0或1.3。此外,新出现的现实证据表明,某些患者可以在延长给药间隔后保持疾病控制,潜在地优化治疗负担和成本效益。从经典的免疫调节剂到生物制剂的过渡已经在前面描述过。然而,迄今为止,阿尔茨海默病患者的生物制剂个体化给药很少受到重视在治疗任何疾病或病人时,用药的指导原则应该是尽可能多地开处方,但尽量少开。这种方法最大限度地减少了副作用和患者不适,同时保持治疗成本低,同时确保治疗目标的实现。Jacobson等人在他们的论文中回顾了有关生物制剂治疗特应性皮炎的给药间隔的文献,特别探讨了延长这些间隔的可能性。使用来自libert - ad SOLO研究(Dupilumab)、ECZTRA 1和2 (Tralokinumab)、ADVOCATE 1和2 (Lebrikizumab)的数据和真实证据,他们评估了延长给药的可行性和最适合这种方法的患者概况。他们的分析表明,在接受生物治疗的患者中,有多达一半的患者可以延长给药间隔。此外,如果治疗效果下降,恢复原来的剂量计划通常可以恢复疾病控制。这些发现可能会显著影响我们对特应性皮炎的日常治疗策略。CV曾获得艾伯维(Abbvie)、Almirall、赛诺菲(Sanofi)、利奥制药(Leo Pharma)、辉瑞(Pfizer)和皮埃尔法伯(Pierre Fabre)等公司的荣誉,担任董事和/或获得资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
874
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (JEADV) is a publication that focuses on dermatology and venereology. It covers various topics within these fields, including both clinical and basic science subjects. The journal publishes articles in different formats, such as editorials, review articles, practice articles, original papers, short reports, letters to the editor, features, and announcements from the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV). The journal covers a wide range of keywords, including allergy, cancer, clinical medicine, cytokines, dermatology, drug reactions, hair disease, laser therapy, nail disease, oncology, skin cancer, skin disease, therapeutics, tumors, virus infections, and venereology. The JEADV is indexed and abstracted by various databases and resources, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Embase, Global Health, InfoTrac, Ingenta Select, MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信