André M. Bellvé, Janet M. Wilmshurst, Jamie R. Wood, Edin Whitehead, R. Paul Scofield, Trevor H. Worthy, Chris P. Gaskin, George L. W. Perry
{"title":"Burrowing Into the Past: Extending Niche Space Models of Procellariiform Breeding Grounds by Merging Fossil and Historic Data","authors":"André M. Bellvé, Janet M. Wilmshurst, Jamie R. Wood, Edin Whitehead, R. Paul Scofield, Trevor H. Worthy, Chris P. Gaskin, George L. W. Perry","doi":"10.1111/ddi.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Predicting species' potential distributions and niches requires multi-scale data encompassing the past and present. Increasingly, researchers have advocated using historical context to inform ecological niche models (ENMs). Two key sources of past distributions are fossils and historical records. Fossils are subject to sampling and taphonomy biases but offer insights into temporal dynamics over millennia. Historical records are filtered by human perceptions over a shorter temporal window, but compared to fossils, provide different contextual information from a potentially broader range of habitats. New Zealand (NZ) has a relatively short history of human occupation, with rich fossil and historical literature archives. Approximately 25% of the world's seabirds breed in NZ, nearly half of which are burrowing procellariiforms. Since human arrival in NZ, most procellariiforms have declined in abundance and breeding ranges, primarily due to introduced mammalian predators. We combined record sources to improve ENMs of burrowing procellariiform breeding colonies and reconstruct narratives of decline.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Aotearoa New Zealand.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We fitted ENMs using a maximum entropy algorithm and mixed-principal component analysis for four sets of occurrence records (fossil, historic, historic + fossil and post-1990) of burrowing procellariiform breeding colonies, where taxa were grouped by functional traits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>For all procellariiform trait groups, the breeding niche space captured separately by the fossils and historical data had low overlap, reflecting different environmental conditions. The combined fossil + historic datasets predicted a niche that overlapped the post-1990 observed niche. Moreover, the fossil and historic datasets combined demonstrated that breeding grounds, now restricted mainly to predator-free settings, were once more widespread and extended further inland throughout NZ.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Historic and fossil occurrence records can complement each other by mitigating biases unique to either dataset to better resolve these procellariiform trait groups ecological breeding niches. Together, such records provide critical insights into the past drivers of species range contractions, contextualising current ecosystems and informing species management planning.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.70032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.70032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
Predicting species' potential distributions and niches requires multi-scale data encompassing the past and present. Increasingly, researchers have advocated using historical context to inform ecological niche models (ENMs). Two key sources of past distributions are fossils and historical records. Fossils are subject to sampling and taphonomy biases but offer insights into temporal dynamics over millennia. Historical records are filtered by human perceptions over a shorter temporal window, but compared to fossils, provide different contextual information from a potentially broader range of habitats. New Zealand (NZ) has a relatively short history of human occupation, with rich fossil and historical literature archives. Approximately 25% of the world's seabirds breed in NZ, nearly half of which are burrowing procellariiforms. Since human arrival in NZ, most procellariiforms have declined in abundance and breeding ranges, primarily due to introduced mammalian predators. We combined record sources to improve ENMs of burrowing procellariiform breeding colonies and reconstruct narratives of decline.
Location
Aotearoa New Zealand.
Methods
We fitted ENMs using a maximum entropy algorithm and mixed-principal component analysis for four sets of occurrence records (fossil, historic, historic + fossil and post-1990) of burrowing procellariiform breeding colonies, where taxa were grouped by functional traits.
Results
For all procellariiform trait groups, the breeding niche space captured separately by the fossils and historical data had low overlap, reflecting different environmental conditions. The combined fossil + historic datasets predicted a niche that overlapped the post-1990 observed niche. Moreover, the fossil and historic datasets combined demonstrated that breeding grounds, now restricted mainly to predator-free settings, were once more widespread and extended further inland throughout NZ.
Main Conclusions
Historic and fossil occurrence records can complement each other by mitigating biases unique to either dataset to better resolve these procellariiform trait groups ecological breeding niches. Together, such records provide critical insights into the past drivers of species range contractions, contextualising current ecosystems and informing species management planning.
期刊介绍:
Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.