Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment for Photoaged Facial Skin: An Investigator-Blinded, Split-Face, Non-Inferiority Trial

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Blanca Estupiñan, Karen Ly, David J. Goldberg
{"title":"Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment for Photoaged Facial Skin: An Investigator-Blinded, Split-Face, Non-Inferiority Trial","authors":"Blanca Estupiñan,&nbsp;Karen Ly,&nbsp;David J. Goldberg","doi":"10.1111/jocd.70208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Exosomes, an emerging treatment of interest to aesthetic dermatology, have therapeutic applications in skin rejuvenation, alopecia, atopic dermatitis, acne scarring, and wound healing. Platelet-rich plasma has been widely utilized for the same indications, among others. Currently, there are no trials comparing the two regenerative modalities in aesthetic dermatology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the efficacy and safety of adipose mesenchymal stem cell-derived (ASC) exosomes versus platelet-rich plasma for photoaged facial skin.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An investigator-blinded, split-face trial was conducted. Participants with mild to moderate photoaging underwent three radiofrequency microneedling treatments with PRP and topical exosomes each applied to one half of the face.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Both exosomes and PRP equally improved wrinkling, dyschromia, erythema, texture, and overall skin appearance. Histological analysis confirmed increased collagen I and glycosaminoglycans, without significant differences between treatment arms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>ASC exosomes are a promising PRP-alternative that may be attractive to needle-averse patients and can hasten the office visit duration, as phlebotomy and centrifugation are not required.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","volume":"24 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jocd.70208","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.70208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Exosomes, an emerging treatment of interest to aesthetic dermatology, have therapeutic applications in skin rejuvenation, alopecia, atopic dermatitis, acne scarring, and wound healing. Platelet-rich plasma has been widely utilized for the same indications, among others. Currently, there are no trials comparing the two regenerative modalities in aesthetic dermatology.

Aims

To compare the efficacy and safety of adipose mesenchymal stem cell-derived (ASC) exosomes versus platelet-rich plasma for photoaged facial skin.

Methods

An investigator-blinded, split-face trial was conducted. Participants with mild to moderate photoaging underwent three radiofrequency microneedling treatments with PRP and topical exosomes each applied to one half of the face.

Results

Both exosomes and PRP equally improved wrinkling, dyschromia, erythema, texture, and overall skin appearance. Histological analysis confirmed increased collagen I and glycosaminoglycans, without significant differences between treatment arms.

Conclusion

ASC exosomes are a promising PRP-alternative that may be attractive to needle-averse patients and can hasten the office visit duration, as phlebotomy and centrifugation are not required.

脂肪间充质干细胞衍生的外泌体与富血小板血浆治疗光老化面部皮肤:一项研究者盲法、裂脸、非劣效性试验
外泌体是一种新兴的皮肤美学治疗方法,在皮肤年轻化、脱发、特应性皮炎、痤疮疤痕和伤口愈合方面具有治疗应用。富血小板血浆已广泛用于相同的适应症,除其他外。目前,在皮肤美容学中还没有比较这两种再生方式的试验。目的比较脂肪间充质干细胞衍生(ASC)外泌体与富血小板血浆治疗光老化面部皮肤的疗效和安全性。方法采用研究者双盲、裂面试验。轻度至中度光老化的参与者接受了三次射频微针治疗,PRP和局部外泌体分别应用于一半面部。结果外泌体和PRP均能改善皱纹、染色障碍、红斑、质地和整体皮肤外观。组织学分析证实胶原I和糖胺聚糖增加,治疗组间无显著差异。结论ASC外泌体是一种很有前途的prp替代方案,可能对厌恶针头的患者有吸引力,并且可以缩短办公室就诊时间,因为不需要静脉切开术和离心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
818
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cosmetic dermatology with the aim to foster the highest standards of patient care in cosmetic dermatology. Published quarterly, the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology facilitates continuing professional development and provides a forum for the exchange of scientific research and innovative techniques. The scope of coverage includes, but will not be limited to: healthy skin; skin maintenance; ageing skin; photodamage and photoprotection; rejuvenation; biochemistry, endocrinology and neuroimmunology of healthy skin; imaging; skin measurement; quality of life; skin types; sensitive skin; rosacea and acne; sebum; sweat; fat; phlebology; hair conservation, restoration and removal; nails and nail surgery; pigment; psychological and medicolegal issues; retinoids; cosmetic chemistry; dermopharmacy; cosmeceuticals; toiletries; striae; cellulite; cosmetic dermatological surgery; blepharoplasty; liposuction; surgical complications; botulinum; fillers, peels and dermabrasion; local and tumescent anaesthesia; electrosurgery; lasers, including laser physics, laser research and safety, vascular lasers, pigment lasers, hair removal lasers, tattoo removal lasers, resurfacing lasers, dermal remodelling lasers and laser complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信