{"title":"Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment for Photoaged Facial Skin: An Investigator-Blinded, Split-Face, Non-Inferiority Trial","authors":"Blanca Estupiñan, Karen Ly, David J. Goldberg","doi":"10.1111/jocd.70208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Exosomes, an emerging treatment of interest to aesthetic dermatology, have therapeutic applications in skin rejuvenation, alopecia, atopic dermatitis, acne scarring, and wound healing. Platelet-rich plasma has been widely utilized for the same indications, among others. Currently, there are no trials comparing the two regenerative modalities in aesthetic dermatology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the efficacy and safety of adipose mesenchymal stem cell-derived (ASC) exosomes versus platelet-rich plasma for photoaged facial skin.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An investigator-blinded, split-face trial was conducted. Participants with mild to moderate photoaging underwent three radiofrequency microneedling treatments with PRP and topical exosomes each applied to one half of the face.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Both exosomes and PRP equally improved wrinkling, dyschromia, erythema, texture, and overall skin appearance. Histological analysis confirmed increased collagen I and glycosaminoglycans, without significant differences between treatment arms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>ASC exosomes are a promising PRP-alternative that may be attractive to needle-averse patients and can hasten the office visit duration, as phlebotomy and centrifugation are not required.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","volume":"24 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jocd.70208","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.70208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Exosomes, an emerging treatment of interest to aesthetic dermatology, have therapeutic applications in skin rejuvenation, alopecia, atopic dermatitis, acne scarring, and wound healing. Platelet-rich plasma has been widely utilized for the same indications, among others. Currently, there are no trials comparing the two regenerative modalities in aesthetic dermatology.
Aims
To compare the efficacy and safety of adipose mesenchymal stem cell-derived (ASC) exosomes versus platelet-rich plasma for photoaged facial skin.
Methods
An investigator-blinded, split-face trial was conducted. Participants with mild to moderate photoaging underwent three radiofrequency microneedling treatments with PRP and topical exosomes each applied to one half of the face.
Results
Both exosomes and PRP equally improved wrinkling, dyschromia, erythema, texture, and overall skin appearance. Histological analysis confirmed increased collagen I and glycosaminoglycans, without significant differences between treatment arms.
Conclusion
ASC exosomes are a promising PRP-alternative that may be attractive to needle-averse patients and can hasten the office visit duration, as phlebotomy and centrifugation are not required.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cosmetic dermatology with the aim to foster the highest standards of patient care in cosmetic dermatology. Published quarterly, the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology facilitates continuing professional development and provides a forum for the exchange of scientific research and innovative techniques.
The scope of coverage includes, but will not be limited to: healthy skin; skin maintenance; ageing skin; photodamage and photoprotection; rejuvenation; biochemistry, endocrinology and neuroimmunology of healthy skin; imaging; skin measurement; quality of life; skin types; sensitive skin; rosacea and acne; sebum; sweat; fat; phlebology; hair conservation, restoration and removal; nails and nail surgery; pigment; psychological and medicolegal issues; retinoids; cosmetic chemistry; dermopharmacy; cosmeceuticals; toiletries; striae; cellulite; cosmetic dermatological surgery; blepharoplasty; liposuction; surgical complications; botulinum; fillers, peels and dermabrasion; local and tumescent anaesthesia; electrosurgery; lasers, including laser physics, laser research and safety, vascular lasers, pigment lasers, hair removal lasers, tattoo removal lasers, resurfacing lasers, dermal remodelling lasers and laser complications.