Heterogeneity in mortality risk prediction: a study of vulnerable adults in the Canadian longitudinal study on aging

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Mame Fana Ndiaye, Mark R. Keezer, Quoc Dinh Nguyen
{"title":"Heterogeneity in mortality risk prediction: a study of vulnerable adults in the Canadian longitudinal study on aging","authors":"Mame Fana Ndiaye,&nbsp;Mark R. Keezer,&nbsp;Quoc Dinh Nguyen","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03063-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Mortality prediction models are essential for clinical decision-making, but their performance may vary across patient subgroups. This study aimed to evaluate how a general mortality prediction model performs across subgroups defined by vulnerability factors and to test whether model improvements could improve prediction accuracy.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed data from 49,266 participants in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. A general mortality prediction model (Model A) was developed using Cox proportional hazard regression with LASSO, incorporating variables spanning sociodemographic factors, lifestyle habits, comorbidities, and physical/cognitive function measures. Performance was evaluated across subgroups defined by age, frailty, multimorbidity, cognitive function, and functional impairment using discrimination (c-index), calibration, and Brier scores. We tested two additional strategies: incorporating subgroup-specific variables (Model B) and developing tailored models for different mortality risk categories (Models C1, C2, C3).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Over a median 6-year follow-up, 7.5% (3672) participants died. The general model performed well overall (c-index: 0.82, 95% CI 0.80–0.84; Brier: 0.036, 95% CI 0.032–0.040), but performance varied across subgroups. It was lower in frail individuals (c-index: 0.73, 95% CI 0.71–0.75; Brier: 0.12, 95% CI 0.11–0.13) and those with multiple chronic conditions (c-index: 0.76, 95% CI 0.75–0.78; Brier: 0.08, 95% CI 0.07–0.08), with risk underestimated in these groups. Neither incorporating subgroup variables nor developing risk-stratified models significantly improved performance.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Important variability in performance, particularly in vulnerable groups, highlights the limitations of a one-size-fits-all and underscores the need for more granular predictive models that account for subpopulation-specific characteristics to enhance mortality risk prediction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03063-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03063-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Mortality prediction models are essential for clinical decision-making, but their performance may vary across patient subgroups. This study aimed to evaluate how a general mortality prediction model performs across subgroups defined by vulnerability factors and to test whether model improvements could improve prediction accuracy.

Methods

We analyzed data from 49,266 participants in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. A general mortality prediction model (Model A) was developed using Cox proportional hazard regression with LASSO, incorporating variables spanning sociodemographic factors, lifestyle habits, comorbidities, and physical/cognitive function measures. Performance was evaluated across subgroups defined by age, frailty, multimorbidity, cognitive function, and functional impairment using discrimination (c-index), calibration, and Brier scores. We tested two additional strategies: incorporating subgroup-specific variables (Model B) and developing tailored models for different mortality risk categories (Models C1, C2, C3).

Results

Over a median 6-year follow-up, 7.5% (3672) participants died. The general model performed well overall (c-index: 0.82, 95% CI 0.80–0.84; Brier: 0.036, 95% CI 0.032–0.040), but performance varied across subgroups. It was lower in frail individuals (c-index: 0.73, 95% CI 0.71–0.75; Brier: 0.12, 95% CI 0.11–0.13) and those with multiple chronic conditions (c-index: 0.76, 95% CI 0.75–0.78; Brier: 0.08, 95% CI 0.07–0.08), with risk underestimated in these groups. Neither incorporating subgroup variables nor developing risk-stratified models significantly improved performance.

Conclusion

Important variability in performance, particularly in vulnerable groups, highlights the limitations of a one-size-fits-all and underscores the need for more granular predictive models that account for subpopulation-specific characteristics to enhance mortality risk prediction.

死亡风险预测的异质性:加拿大老龄化纵向研究中脆弱成人的研究
死亡率预测模型对临床决策至关重要,但其表现可能因患者亚组而异。本研究旨在评估一般死亡率预测模型在由脆弱性因素定义的亚组中的表现,并测试模型改进是否可以提高预测准确性。方法:我们分析了来自加拿大老龄化纵向研究的49,266名参与者的数据。结合社会人口因素、生活习惯、合并症和身体/认知功能测量等变量,采用Cox比例风险回归和LASSO建立了一般死亡率预测模型(模型A)。通过区分(c-index)、校准和Brier评分对年龄、虚弱、多发病、认知功能和功能障碍等亚组的表现进行评估。我们测试了另外两种策略:结合亚组特定变量(模型B)和针对不同死亡风险类别开发量身定制的模型(模型C1、C2、C3)。在中位6年的随访中,有7.5%(3672)的参与者死亡。一般模型总体表现良好(c-index: 0.82, 95% CI 0.80-0.84;Brier: 0.036, 95% CI 0.032-0.040),但不同亚组的表现不同。体弱个体较低(c-index: 0.73, 95% CI 0.71-0.75;Brier: 0.12, 95% CI 0.11-0.13)和多重慢性疾病患者(c-index: 0.76, 95% CI 0.75-0.78;Brier: 0.08, 95% CI 0.07-0.08),这些组的风险被低估。无论是合并子组变量还是开发风险分层模型都不能显著提高绩效。结论表现的重要可变性,特别是在弱势群体中,突出了一刀切的局限性,并强调需要更细粒度的预测模型,考虑亚人群特异性特征,以增强死亡风险预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信