Mame Fana Ndiaye, Mark R. Keezer, Quoc Dinh Nguyen
{"title":"Heterogeneity in mortality risk prediction: a study of vulnerable adults in the Canadian longitudinal study on aging","authors":"Mame Fana Ndiaye, Mark R. Keezer, Quoc Dinh Nguyen","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03063-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Mortality prediction models are essential for clinical decision-making, but their performance may vary across patient subgroups. This study aimed to evaluate how a general mortality prediction model performs across subgroups defined by vulnerability factors and to test whether model improvements could improve prediction accuracy.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed data from 49,266 participants in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. A general mortality prediction model (Model A) was developed using Cox proportional hazard regression with LASSO, incorporating variables spanning sociodemographic factors, lifestyle habits, comorbidities, and physical/cognitive function measures. Performance was evaluated across subgroups defined by age, frailty, multimorbidity, cognitive function, and functional impairment using discrimination (c-index), calibration, and Brier scores. We tested two additional strategies: incorporating subgroup-specific variables (Model B) and developing tailored models for different mortality risk categories (Models C1, C2, C3).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Over a median 6-year follow-up, 7.5% (3672) participants died. The general model performed well overall (c-index: 0.82, 95% CI 0.80–0.84; Brier: 0.036, 95% CI 0.032–0.040), but performance varied across subgroups. It was lower in frail individuals (c-index: 0.73, 95% CI 0.71–0.75; Brier: 0.12, 95% CI 0.11–0.13) and those with multiple chronic conditions (c-index: 0.76, 95% CI 0.75–0.78; Brier: 0.08, 95% CI 0.07–0.08), with risk underestimated in these groups. Neither incorporating subgroup variables nor developing risk-stratified models significantly improved performance.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Important variability in performance, particularly in vulnerable groups, highlights the limitations of a one-size-fits-all and underscores the need for more granular predictive models that account for subpopulation-specific characteristics to enhance mortality risk prediction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03063-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03063-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Mortality prediction models are essential for clinical decision-making, but their performance may vary across patient subgroups. This study aimed to evaluate how a general mortality prediction model performs across subgroups defined by vulnerability factors and to test whether model improvements could improve prediction accuracy.
Methods
We analyzed data from 49,266 participants in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. A general mortality prediction model (Model A) was developed using Cox proportional hazard regression with LASSO, incorporating variables spanning sociodemographic factors, lifestyle habits, comorbidities, and physical/cognitive function measures. Performance was evaluated across subgroups defined by age, frailty, multimorbidity, cognitive function, and functional impairment using discrimination (c-index), calibration, and Brier scores. We tested two additional strategies: incorporating subgroup-specific variables (Model B) and developing tailored models for different mortality risk categories (Models C1, C2, C3).
Results
Over a median 6-year follow-up, 7.5% (3672) participants died. The general model performed well overall (c-index: 0.82, 95% CI 0.80–0.84; Brier: 0.036, 95% CI 0.032–0.040), but performance varied across subgroups. It was lower in frail individuals (c-index: 0.73, 95% CI 0.71–0.75; Brier: 0.12, 95% CI 0.11–0.13) and those with multiple chronic conditions (c-index: 0.76, 95% CI 0.75–0.78; Brier: 0.08, 95% CI 0.07–0.08), with risk underestimated in these groups. Neither incorporating subgroup variables nor developing risk-stratified models significantly improved performance.
Conclusion
Important variability in performance, particularly in vulnerable groups, highlights the limitations of a one-size-fits-all and underscores the need for more granular predictive models that account for subpopulation-specific characteristics to enhance mortality risk prediction.
死亡率预测模型对临床决策至关重要,但其表现可能因患者亚组而异。本研究旨在评估一般死亡率预测模型在由脆弱性因素定义的亚组中的表现,并测试模型改进是否可以提高预测准确性。方法:我们分析了来自加拿大老龄化纵向研究的49,266名参与者的数据。结合社会人口因素、生活习惯、合并症和身体/认知功能测量等变量,采用Cox比例风险回归和LASSO建立了一般死亡率预测模型(模型A)。通过区分(c-index)、校准和Brier评分对年龄、虚弱、多发病、认知功能和功能障碍等亚组的表现进行评估。我们测试了另外两种策略:结合亚组特定变量(模型B)和针对不同死亡风险类别开发量身定制的模型(模型C1、C2、C3)。在中位6年的随访中,有7.5%(3672)的参与者死亡。一般模型总体表现良好(c-index: 0.82, 95% CI 0.80-0.84;Brier: 0.036, 95% CI 0.032-0.040),但不同亚组的表现不同。体弱个体较低(c-index: 0.73, 95% CI 0.71-0.75;Brier: 0.12, 95% CI 0.11-0.13)和多重慢性疾病患者(c-index: 0.76, 95% CI 0.75-0.78;Brier: 0.08, 95% CI 0.07-0.08),这些组的风险被低估。无论是合并子组变量还是开发风险分层模型都不能显著提高绩效。结论表现的重要可变性,特别是在弱势群体中,突出了一刀切的局限性,并强调需要更细粒度的预测模型,考虑亚人群特异性特征,以增强死亡风险预测。
期刊介绍:
Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.