The role of volumetry in sinonasal cancer response assessment to induction chemotherapy, results from two phase II non-randomized controlled prospective multicentric trials: SINTART-1 and SINTART-2
Paolo Rondi , Davide Mattavelli , Vittorio Rampinelli , Alberto Schreiber , Ester Orlandi , Barbara Vischioni , Nicola A. Iacovelli , Giuseppina Calareso , Cristiana Bergamini , Salvatore Alfieri , Paolo Castelnuovo , Paolo Battaglia , Mario Turri-Zanoni , Piero Nicolai , Marco Ferrari , Lisa Licitra , Paolo Bossi , Davide Farina , Marco Ravanelli , Carlo Resteghini
{"title":"The role of volumetry in sinonasal cancer response assessment to induction chemotherapy, results from two phase II non-randomized controlled prospective multicentric trials: SINTART-1 and SINTART-2","authors":"Paolo Rondi , Davide Mattavelli , Vittorio Rampinelli , Alberto Schreiber , Ester Orlandi , Barbara Vischioni , Nicola A. Iacovelli , Giuseppina Calareso , Cristiana Bergamini , Salvatore Alfieri , Paolo Castelnuovo , Paolo Battaglia , Mario Turri-Zanoni , Piero Nicolai , Marco Ferrari , Lisa Licitra , Paolo Bossi , Davide Farina , Marco Ravanelli , Carlo Resteghini","doi":"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to identify the best response criteria in patients with sinonasal cancer undergoing induction chemotherapy (IC).</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Patients enrolled in SINTART-1 and SINTART-2 were included in this study. Unidimensional diameters (anteroposterior, AP; laterolateral, LL; craniocaudal, CC), maximum axial area (Amax), and volume (V) were performed on MRI by two radiologists. RECIST 1.1 assessment was included as a categorical variable. Variables were evaluated at baseline, after the 1st chemotherapy cycle, and at the best response. Interobserver repeatability was analyzed. Stepwise univariable and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to correlate variables with Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>60 patients were included in this study. Interobserver correlation coefficient at baseline and after 1st IC cycle was excellent for V (0.916 and 0.928 respectively), CC diameter (0.96 and 0.863), and AP diameter (0.846 and 0.796), good for LL diameter, and moderate for Amax. RECIST 1.1 criteria after the 1st IC cycle and at best response were not associated with OS and DFS. Volume variation after the 1st IC cycle and at best response was significantly associated with OS (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.002) and DFS (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.005). At the multivariable analysis, V variation after the 1st IC cycle and at best response was the only variable significantly associated with OS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.0019) and DFS (p = 0.0004 and p = 0.004).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Volume variation should be preferred to RECIST 1.1 and other measurements to describe the radiological response to IC in sinonasal cancers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19716,"journal":{"name":"Oral oncology","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 107388"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1368837525002179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study aims to identify the best response criteria in patients with sinonasal cancer undergoing induction chemotherapy (IC).
Material and methods
Patients enrolled in SINTART-1 and SINTART-2 were included in this study. Unidimensional diameters (anteroposterior, AP; laterolateral, LL; craniocaudal, CC), maximum axial area (Amax), and volume (V) were performed on MRI by two radiologists. RECIST 1.1 assessment was included as a categorical variable. Variables were evaluated at baseline, after the 1st chemotherapy cycle, and at the best response. Interobserver repeatability was analyzed. Stepwise univariable and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to correlate variables with Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS).
Results
60 patients were included in this study. Interobserver correlation coefficient at baseline and after 1st IC cycle was excellent for V (0.916 and 0.928 respectively), CC diameter (0.96 and 0.863), and AP diameter (0.846 and 0.796), good for LL diameter, and moderate for Amax. RECIST 1.1 criteria after the 1st IC cycle and at best response were not associated with OS and DFS. Volume variation after the 1st IC cycle and at best response was significantly associated with OS (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.002) and DFS (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.005). At the multivariable analysis, V variation after the 1st IC cycle and at best response was the only variable significantly associated with OS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.0019) and DFS (p = 0.0004 and p = 0.004).
Conclusions
Volume variation should be preferred to RECIST 1.1 and other measurements to describe the radiological response to IC in sinonasal cancers.
期刊介绍:
Oral Oncology is an international interdisciplinary journal which publishes high quality original research, clinical trials and review articles, editorials, and commentaries relating to the etiopathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neoplasms in the head and neck.
Oral Oncology is of interest to head and neck surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, maxillo-facial surgeons, oto-rhino-laryngologists, plastic surgeons, pathologists, scientists, oral medical specialists, special care dentists, dental care professionals, general dental practitioners, public health physicians, palliative care physicians, nurses, radiologists, radiographers, dieticians, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, nutritionists, clinical and health psychologists and counselors, professionals in end of life care, as well as others interested in these fields.