An emotion-behavior perspective of understanding public and government responses to rainstorm disasters: A case study of Zhengzhou Rainstorm in China

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES
Xin Wan , Xinyu Ding , Sijia Liu , Yan Zhang , Xinyi Luo , Jingfeng Yuan , Changzheng Zhang
{"title":"An emotion-behavior perspective of understanding public and government responses to rainstorm disasters: A case study of Zhengzhou Rainstorm in China","authors":"Xin Wan ,&nbsp;Xinyu Ding ,&nbsp;Sijia Liu ,&nbsp;Yan Zhang ,&nbsp;Xinyi Luo ,&nbsp;Jingfeng Yuan ,&nbsp;Changzheng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding public emotional and behavioral response is critical for adaptive disaster management. Integrating natural language processing (NLP), econometric, and social psychological models, this study establishes an emotion-behavior framework to analyze multidimensional interactions between public and government responses. Using social media data from “7.20” Zhengzhou Rainstorm, we reveal distinct emotional drivers: social support offering (SSO) thrived on positive emotions, yet help seeking (HSK) correlated with fear, deviance (DEV) driven by anger, and avoidance &amp; venting (A&amp;V) sustained by multiple negative emotions. Public behavior patterns shifted from pre-disaster instrumental aid to fear-driven avoidance coupled with emotional aid arising during crises, eventually evolving into intensified post-disaster resource competition. Government strategies show asymmetric impacts on these behaviors. Most strategies yielded instantly positive effects on SSO, while all strategies responded passively to HSK and some had time-lag or limited effects in mitigating A&amp;V and DEV. The findings advocate integrating psychosocial factors into emergency strategies, with emphases on prioritizing proactive community engagement to sustain social cohesion, embedding psychological support mechanisms, and enforcing transparent resource governance to redirect emotions like fear, anger, and sadness. This approach advances urban resilience by highlighting that adaptive climate defenses requires aligning policy interventions with community-driven collaboration and emotion-driven public behavioral dynamics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 106077"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125003774","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding public emotional and behavioral response is critical for adaptive disaster management. Integrating natural language processing (NLP), econometric, and social psychological models, this study establishes an emotion-behavior framework to analyze multidimensional interactions between public and government responses. Using social media data from “7.20” Zhengzhou Rainstorm, we reveal distinct emotional drivers: social support offering (SSO) thrived on positive emotions, yet help seeking (HSK) correlated with fear, deviance (DEV) driven by anger, and avoidance & venting (A&V) sustained by multiple negative emotions. Public behavior patterns shifted from pre-disaster instrumental aid to fear-driven avoidance coupled with emotional aid arising during crises, eventually evolving into intensified post-disaster resource competition. Government strategies show asymmetric impacts on these behaviors. Most strategies yielded instantly positive effects on SSO, while all strategies responded passively to HSK and some had time-lag or limited effects in mitigating A&V and DEV. The findings advocate integrating psychosocial factors into emergency strategies, with emphases on prioritizing proactive community engagement to sustain social cohesion, embedding psychological support mechanisms, and enforcing transparent resource governance to redirect emotions like fear, anger, and sadness. This approach advances urban resilience by highlighting that adaptive climate defenses requires aligning policy interventions with community-driven collaboration and emotion-driven public behavioral dynamics.
从情绪-行为视角理解公众和政府对暴雨灾害的反应——以郑州暴雨为例
了解公众的情绪和行为反应对于适应性灾害管理至关重要。本研究整合自然语言处理(NLP)、计量经济学和社会心理学模型,建立了一个情绪-行为框架来分析公众和政府反应之间的多维互动。利用“7.20”郑州暴雨的社交媒体数据,我们揭示了不同的情绪驱动因素:社会支持提供(SSO)与积极情绪相关,而寻求帮助(HSK)与恐惧、愤怒驱动的偏差(DEV)和逃避相关;由多重负面情绪持续的发泄(A&;V)公众行为模式从灾前的工具性援助转变为危机中出现的恐惧驱动的回避和情感援助,最终演变为加剧的灾后资源竞争。政府策略对这些行为的影响是不对称的。大多数策略都能立即产生积极的影响,而所有策略对HSK的反应都是被动的,有些策略在缓解a&&; V和DEV方面存在滞后或有限的效果。研究结果主张将社会心理因素纳入应急策略,重点是优先考虑积极的社区参与,以维持社会凝聚力,嵌入心理支持机制,并实施透明的资源管理,以重新引导恐惧、愤怒和悲伤等情绪。这种方法通过强调适应性气候防御需要将政策干预与社区驱动的合作和情感驱动的公共行为动态相结合,从而提高城市抵御能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信