Mini-review: Harm reduction strategies among people who intentionally use fentanyl

Q1 Psychology
Jacob Paredes, Ashish Sandhu, Shutong Huo, David S. Timberlake
{"title":"Mini-review: Harm reduction strategies among people who intentionally use fentanyl","authors":"Jacob Paredes,&nbsp;Ashish Sandhu,&nbsp;Shutong Huo,&nbsp;David S. Timberlake","doi":"10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Most published studies aimed at curtailing the morbidity and mortality associated with the current U.S. opioid epidemic have focused on unintentional exposure to fentanyl through heroin, cocaine, and other substances. Yet, there is mounting evidence that the intentional use of fentanyl is a key contributor to the current epidemic. In this mini-review we will discuss the harm reduction methods employed by people who intentionally use fentanyl (PWIUF) from a handful of articles found through PubMed that included PWIUF that were published between January 2013 to January 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The perceived harm reduction strategies included co-use of stimulants, dose reduction, buying from a trusted dealer, drug checking, conducting a test shot, carrying naloxone, using fentanyl with others, and switching from injection to another route of administration (e.g., smoking). Some of these harm reduction strategies are frequently used by persons who inject heroin but future research on the efficacy of these harm reduction strategies for fentanyl use is warranted. It is important to note that co-use of stimulants has been associated with an increase in overdose.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Future research is needed to understand intentional fentanyl use, perceived harm reduction strategies and the efficacy of these strategies with the advent of stronger opioids. Future research about PWIUF should consider novel study designs such as the ecological momentary assessment for more granular observation of the use of harm reduction strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38040,"journal":{"name":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100615"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853225000331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Most published studies aimed at curtailing the morbidity and mortality associated with the current U.S. opioid epidemic have focused on unintentional exposure to fentanyl through heroin, cocaine, and other substances. Yet, there is mounting evidence that the intentional use of fentanyl is a key contributor to the current epidemic. In this mini-review we will discuss the harm reduction methods employed by people who intentionally use fentanyl (PWIUF) from a handful of articles found through PubMed that included PWIUF that were published between January 2013 to January 2024.

Results

The perceived harm reduction strategies included co-use of stimulants, dose reduction, buying from a trusted dealer, drug checking, conducting a test shot, carrying naloxone, using fentanyl with others, and switching from injection to another route of administration (e.g., smoking). Some of these harm reduction strategies are frequently used by persons who inject heroin but future research on the efficacy of these harm reduction strategies for fentanyl use is warranted. It is important to note that co-use of stimulants has been associated with an increase in overdose.

Conclusion

Future research is needed to understand intentional fentanyl use, perceived harm reduction strategies and the efficacy of these strategies with the advent of stronger opioids. Future research about PWIUF should consider novel study designs such as the ecological momentary assessment for more granular observation of the use of harm reduction strategies.
小型综述:在故意使用芬太尼的人群中减少危害的策略
背景:大多数已发表的旨在减少与当前美国阿片类药物流行相关的发病率和死亡率的研究都集中在通过海洛因、可卡因和其他物质无意中暴露于芬太尼上。然而,越来越多的证据表明,故意使用芬太尼是当前流行病的一个关键因素。在这篇小型综述中,我们将讨论故意使用芬太尼(PWIUF)的人所采用的减少危害的方法,这些方法来自于2013年1月至2024年1月间发表的PubMed上的一些文章,其中包括PWIUF。结果认为减少危害的策略包括:联合使用兴奋剂、减少剂量、从可信的经销商处购买、检查药物、进行测试注射、携带纳洛酮、与他人一起使用芬太尼、从注射方式转向其他给药方式(如吸烟)。注射海洛因的人经常使用其中一些减少危害策略,但有必要进一步研究这些减少危害策略对芬太尼使用的功效。值得注意的是,兴奋剂的共同使用与过量用药的增加有关。结论随着更强阿片类药物的出现,需要进一步研究芬太尼的故意使用、感知危害减少策略以及这些策略的效果。未来关于PWIUF的研究应该考虑新的研究设计,如生态瞬时评估,以更细致地观察减少危害策略的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addictive Behaviors Reports
Addictive Behaviors Reports Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors Reports is an open-access and peer reviewed online-only journal offering an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research in addictive behaviors. The journal accepts submissions that are scientifically sound on all forms of addictive behavior (alcohol, drugs, gambling, Internet, nicotine and technology) with a primary focus on behavioral and psychosocial research. The emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. We are particularly interested in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research. Studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry as well as scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are also very much encouraged. We also welcome multimedia submissions that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信