Gaze behavior in face-to-face interaction: A cross-cultural investigation between Japan and The Netherlands

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Roy S. Hessels , Toshiki Iwabuchi , Diederick C. Niehorster , Ren Funawatari , Jeroen S. Benjamins , Sayaka Kawakami , Marcus Nyström , Momoka Suda , Ignace T.C. Hooge , Motofumi Sumiya , Julie I.P. Heijnen , Martin K. Teunisse , Atsushi Senju
{"title":"Gaze behavior in face-to-face interaction: A cross-cultural investigation between Japan and The Netherlands","authors":"Roy S. Hessels ,&nbsp;Toshiki Iwabuchi ,&nbsp;Diederick C. Niehorster ,&nbsp;Ren Funawatari ,&nbsp;Jeroen S. Benjamins ,&nbsp;Sayaka Kawakami ,&nbsp;Marcus Nyström ,&nbsp;Momoka Suda ,&nbsp;Ignace T.C. Hooge ,&nbsp;Motofumi Sumiya ,&nbsp;Julie I.P. Heijnen ,&nbsp;Martin K. Teunisse ,&nbsp;Atsushi Senju","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research suggests a pattern of gaze avoidance in East Asian compared with Western cultures. Yet, recent eye-tracking studies of face-to-face conversation do not corroborate this. More generally, differences in nonverbal communication and analytic versus holistic strategies have been described between East Asian and Western cultures. Using wearable eye-tracking technology and an automated gaze-processing pipeline, we investigated cross-cultural differences in gaze behavior during unstructured conversation and collaborative interactions from an information-gathering and information-signaling perspective. We compared Japanese and Dutch individuals on gaze to faces, gaze–gesture coupling, and gaze–action coupling. Japanese participants consistently looked less at faces than their Dutch counterparts in all interactive scenarios. Additionally, Japanese individuals displayed fewer pointing gestures and kept their hands under the table longer. Although gaze coupling with manual actions and pointing gestures was similar across both groups, longer-term gaze–action patterns varied, reflecting potential differences in cultural strategies (holistic vs. analytic) and error orientation styles. These findings suggest that while visuomotor coordination is consistent, extended patterns of gaze in the context of collaboration diverge based on cultural context. Our study underscores the need to assess gaze behavior within the interaction rather than in isolation, integrating visuomotor behavior, nonverbal communication and cultural context. Additionally, our findings may aid in developing individually- and culturally-sensitive anthropomorphic virtual avatars and social robots.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 106174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027725001143","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research suggests a pattern of gaze avoidance in East Asian compared with Western cultures. Yet, recent eye-tracking studies of face-to-face conversation do not corroborate this. More generally, differences in nonverbal communication and analytic versus holistic strategies have been described between East Asian and Western cultures. Using wearable eye-tracking technology and an automated gaze-processing pipeline, we investigated cross-cultural differences in gaze behavior during unstructured conversation and collaborative interactions from an information-gathering and information-signaling perspective. We compared Japanese and Dutch individuals on gaze to faces, gaze–gesture coupling, and gaze–action coupling. Japanese participants consistently looked less at faces than their Dutch counterparts in all interactive scenarios. Additionally, Japanese individuals displayed fewer pointing gestures and kept their hands under the table longer. Although gaze coupling with manual actions and pointing gestures was similar across both groups, longer-term gaze–action patterns varied, reflecting potential differences in cultural strategies (holistic vs. analytic) and error orientation styles. These findings suggest that while visuomotor coordination is consistent, extended patterns of gaze in the context of collaboration diverge based on cultural context. Our study underscores the need to assess gaze behavior within the interaction rather than in isolation, integrating visuomotor behavior, nonverbal communication and cultural context. Additionally, our findings may aid in developing individually- and culturally-sensitive anthropomorphic virtual avatars and social robots.
面对面互动中的凝视行为:日本与荷兰的跨文化研究
先前的研究表明,与西方文化相比,东亚人有一种回避凝视的模式。然而,最近关于面对面谈话的眼球追踪研究并没有证实这一点。更一般地说,东亚和西方文化在非语言交际和分析与整体策略方面的差异已经被描述。利用可穿戴眼动追踪技术和自动注视处理管道,我们从信息收集和信息信号的角度研究了非结构化对话和协作互动中注视行为的跨文化差异。我们比较了日本人和荷兰人在注视面孔、注视-手势耦合和注视-动作耦合方面的差异。在所有互动场景中,日本参与者总是比荷兰参与者看脸的次数少。此外,日本人很少用手指的手势,把手放在桌子下面的时间也更长。尽管在两组中,注视与手动动作和指向手势的耦合是相似的,但长期注视-动作模式有所不同,反映了文化策略(整体vs.分析)和错误导向风格的潜在差异。这些发现表明,虽然视觉运动协调是一致的,但合作背景下的凝视扩展模式因文化背景而异。我们的研究强调需要在互动中评估凝视行为,而不是孤立地评估,将视觉运动行为、非语言交流和文化背景结合起来。此外,我们的发现可能有助于开发个人和文化敏感的拟人化虚拟化身和社交机器人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信