From past critiques to present challenges: A review of LCA approaches and results in the aluminum industry

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Federico Rossi , Chiara De Bernardi , Marco Frey , Monia Niero
{"title":"From past critiques to present challenges: A review of LCA approaches and results in the aluminum industry","authors":"Federico Rossi ,&nbsp;Chiara De Bernardi ,&nbsp;Marco Frey ,&nbsp;Monia Niero","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aluminum is a critical raw material and a key resource in manufacturing. Hence, to promote environmental sustainability in this industry, Life Cycle Assessment has largely been used as a quantitative methodology for assessing its overall impact. However, since 2012, several advancements have been made to Life Cycle Assessment methodology in terms of the technologies considered and the waste management strategies used. This study, therefore, has two main aims: i) to assess whether the literature gaps identified in the last major review of Life Cycle Assessment in the aluminum sector, conducted in 2012, have now been addressed; and ii) to identify any new challenges in this sector for Life Cycle Assessment practitioners that might have emerged over the past 15 years. The results of this review show that there has been some convergence in methodological practices, particularly in terms of the definitions for functional units, system boundaries, and end-of-life modeling. However, there is also a huge margin for improvement. The environmental metrics used are typically not comparable. The main challenges remain when attempting to apply the Product Environmental Footprint method, and, further, exploring new decarbonization technologies and circular waste management strategies remains persistently difficult.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23969,"journal":{"name":"Waste management","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 114900"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X25003113","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aluminum is a critical raw material and a key resource in manufacturing. Hence, to promote environmental sustainability in this industry, Life Cycle Assessment has largely been used as a quantitative methodology for assessing its overall impact. However, since 2012, several advancements have been made to Life Cycle Assessment methodology in terms of the technologies considered and the waste management strategies used. This study, therefore, has two main aims: i) to assess whether the literature gaps identified in the last major review of Life Cycle Assessment in the aluminum sector, conducted in 2012, have now been addressed; and ii) to identify any new challenges in this sector for Life Cycle Assessment practitioners that might have emerged over the past 15 years. The results of this review show that there has been some convergence in methodological practices, particularly in terms of the definitions for functional units, system boundaries, and end-of-life modeling. However, there is also a huge margin for improvement. The environmental metrics used are typically not comparable. The main challenges remain when attempting to apply the Product Environmental Footprint method, and, further, exploring new decarbonization technologies and circular waste management strategies remains persistently difficult.
从过去的批评到现在的挑战:对铝行业LCA方法和结果的回顾
铝是制造业的关键原材料和关键资源。因此,为了促进该行业的环境可持续性,生命周期评估在很大程度上被用作评估其总体影响的定量方法。然而,自2012年以来,在所考虑的技术和所使用的废物管理战略方面,生命周期评估方法取得了一些进展。因此,本研究有两个主要目的:i)评估在2012年进行的铝行业生命周期评估的最后一次重大审查中发现的文献空白是否已经得到解决;ii)确定生命周期评估从业者在过去15年中可能出现的任何新挑战。这篇综述的结果表明,在方法论实践中,特别是在功能单元、系统边界和生命周期结束建模的定义方面,已经有了一些趋同。然而,还有很大的改进余地。所使用的环境指标通常不具有可比性。在尝试应用产品环境足迹方法时,主要挑战仍然存在,此外,探索新的脱碳技术和循环废物管理策略仍然很困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Waste management
Waste management 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
492
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Waste Management is devoted to the presentation and discussion of information on solid wastes,it covers the entire lifecycle of solid. wastes. Scope: Addresses solid wastes in both industrialized and economically developing countries Covers various types of solid wastes, including: Municipal (e.g., residential, institutional, commercial, light industrial) Agricultural Special (e.g., C and D, healthcare, household hazardous wastes, sewage sludge)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信