The informed choice model of care: Offering caregivers choices for infant behavioural sleep intervention

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sarah Blunden , Sarah Honaker , Jacy Hyland , Perran Boran , Alex Metse
{"title":"The informed choice model of care: Offering caregivers choices for infant behavioural sleep intervention","authors":"Sarah Blunden ,&nbsp;Sarah Honaker ,&nbsp;Jacy Hyland ,&nbsp;Perran Boran ,&nbsp;Alex Metse","doi":"10.1016/j.sleep.2025.106596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sleep in infants aged 6–18 months can be disrupted and may cause impairment in some families. Caregivers often seek assistance to improve their infant's sleep through behavioural sleep interventions (BSI). BSI approaches can vary considerably ranging from leaving a child to cry alone to reactive co-sleeping. The majority of available literature on BSI focusses on less responsive approaches (such as controlled crying or cry-it-out) and so understandably these are the most commonly recommended and prescribed by health professionals. However, these may not be the preferred option for some caregivers. Many factors influence caregiver choice of a preferred intervention for their infant, including their beliefs about controlled crying, caregiver cry-tolerance, infant age and temperament, and cultural norms. Yet many caregivers seeking help from healthcare providers for infant sleep report being presented with only one or two BSI options, denying them the opportunity to make an informed decision about a preferred choice.</div><div>We propose here the notion of an Informed Choice Model of Care (ICMoC) in which those caregivers who are seeking help for perceived sleep problems in their infants, are informed about a broad range of BSIs and select an approach that best fits their needs and preferences in collaboration with their child's healthcare provider. We suggest that the use of the ICMoC may increase caregiver agency and empowerment, facilitate successful completion of BSI protocols, and thus reduce the negative impacts of poor sleep for infants and their families.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21874,"journal":{"name":"Sleep medicine","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 106596"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945725002710","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sleep in infants aged 6–18 months can be disrupted and may cause impairment in some families. Caregivers often seek assistance to improve their infant's sleep through behavioural sleep interventions (BSI). BSI approaches can vary considerably ranging from leaving a child to cry alone to reactive co-sleeping. The majority of available literature on BSI focusses on less responsive approaches (such as controlled crying or cry-it-out) and so understandably these are the most commonly recommended and prescribed by health professionals. However, these may not be the preferred option for some caregivers. Many factors influence caregiver choice of a preferred intervention for their infant, including their beliefs about controlled crying, caregiver cry-tolerance, infant age and temperament, and cultural norms. Yet many caregivers seeking help from healthcare providers for infant sleep report being presented with only one or two BSI options, denying them the opportunity to make an informed decision about a preferred choice.
We propose here the notion of an Informed Choice Model of Care (ICMoC) in which those caregivers who are seeking help for perceived sleep problems in their infants, are informed about a broad range of BSIs and select an approach that best fits their needs and preferences in collaboration with their child's healthcare provider. We suggest that the use of the ICMoC may increase caregiver agency and empowerment, facilitate successful completion of BSI protocols, and thus reduce the negative impacts of poor sleep for infants and their families.
护理的知情选择模型:为照顾者提供婴儿行为睡眠干预的选择
6-18个月婴儿的睡眠可能会中断,并可能在一些家庭中造成损害。照顾者经常通过行为睡眠干预(BSI)寻求帮助来改善婴儿的睡眠。BSI的方法可以有很大的不同,从让孩子独自哭泣到反应性共睡。大多数关于BSI的现有文献都集中在反应较差的方法上(如控制哭泣或大哭),因此可以理解,这些是卫生专业人员最常推荐和开出的处方。然而,这些可能不是一些护理人员的首选选择。许多因素影响照顾者对婴儿首选干预措施的选择,包括他们对控制哭泣的信念,照顾者的哭泣耐受性,婴儿的年龄和气质,以及文化规范。然而,许多向医疗保健提供者寻求婴儿睡眠帮助的护理人员报告说,他们只有一两个BSI选项,使他们没有机会就首选的选择做出明智的决定。我们在此提出了“知情选择护理模式”(ICMoC)的概念,在这种模式下,那些为婴儿感知到的睡眠问题寻求帮助的照顾者,被告知广泛的脑梗死,并与孩子的医疗保健提供者合作,选择最适合他们需求和偏好的方法。我们认为,使用ICMoC可以增加照顾者的代理和授权,促进成功完成BSI协议,从而减少睡眠不良对婴儿及其家庭的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep medicine
Sleep medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1060
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine aims to be a journal no one involved in clinical sleep medicine can do without. A journal primarily focussing on the human aspects of sleep, integrating the various disciplines that are involved in sleep medicine: neurology, clinical neurophysiology, internal medicine (particularly pulmonology and cardiology), psychology, psychiatry, sleep technology, pediatrics, neurosurgery, otorhinolaryngology, and dentistry. The journal publishes the following types of articles: Reviews (also intended as a way to bridge the gap between basic sleep research and clinical relevance); Original Research Articles; Full-length articles; Brief communications; Controversies; Case reports; Letters to the Editor; Journal search and commentaries; Book reviews; Meeting announcements; Listing of relevant organisations plus web sites.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信