Differentiation of executive functions during adolescence: Converging evidence from behavioral, genetic and neural data

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ruochen Yin , Xinrui Wang , Xiaoyu Zhao , Chuansheng Chen , Qi Dong , Qiang Wang , Yuan Fang , Chunhui Chen
{"title":"Differentiation of executive functions during adolescence: Converging evidence from behavioral, genetic and neural data","authors":"Ruochen Yin ,&nbsp;Xinrui Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Zhao ,&nbsp;Chuansheng Chen ,&nbsp;Qi Dong ,&nbsp;Qiang Wang ,&nbsp;Yuan Fang ,&nbsp;Chunhui Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2025.109058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Executive functions (EF) have been found to differentiate from a single component to three distinct components (i.e., updating, shifting, and inhibition) during development. However, there is still much debate regarding when such differentiation takes place and biological evidence is needed. Here we used the longitudinal and multimodality data from the ABCD study to address this question at two age groups (9–10 and 13–14). Three tasks (i.e., List, Card and Flanker tasks) were used to represent the three EF components respectively at baseline, and two tasks (Flanker and List) at 4th year follow up. Genes associated with each task were identified by whole genome and transcriptome association analyses and were then used for genetic similarity calculation; structural and functional brain indices related to each task were identified and used to assess neural similarity. We found that at baseline (9–10 years old), the three EF components were behaviorally highly inter-correlated and were associated with many of the same genes and the same brain regions. Four years later, the follow-up data (with Flanker and List tasks only) still showed significant but smaller behavioral/genetic/neural similarity. This study is the first to chart the path of EF differentiation during adolescence by combining behavioral, genetic, and neural data, and this approach may be relevant to the study of development of other cognitive abilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 109058"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051125000766","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Executive functions (EF) have been found to differentiate from a single component to three distinct components (i.e., updating, shifting, and inhibition) during development. However, there is still much debate regarding when such differentiation takes place and biological evidence is needed. Here we used the longitudinal and multimodality data from the ABCD study to address this question at two age groups (9–10 and 13–14). Three tasks (i.e., List, Card and Flanker tasks) were used to represent the three EF components respectively at baseline, and two tasks (Flanker and List) at 4th year follow up. Genes associated with each task were identified by whole genome and transcriptome association analyses and were then used for genetic similarity calculation; structural and functional brain indices related to each task were identified and used to assess neural similarity. We found that at baseline (9–10 years old), the three EF components were behaviorally highly inter-correlated and were associated with many of the same genes and the same brain regions. Four years later, the follow-up data (with Flanker and List tasks only) still showed significant but smaller behavioral/genetic/neural similarity. This study is the first to chart the path of EF differentiation during adolescence by combining behavioral, genetic, and neural data, and this approach may be relevant to the study of development of other cognitive abilities.
青少年执行功能的分化:来自行为、遗传和神经数据的证据。
在发育过程中,执行功能(EF)已被发现从单一成分到三个不同的成分(即更新、转移和抑制)。然而,关于这种分化何时发生,以及需要生物学证据,仍有很多争论。在这里,我们使用ABCD研究的纵向和多模态数据来解决两个年龄组(9-10岁和13-14岁)的这个问题。基线时使用三个任务(即List, Card和Flanker任务)分别表示三个EF成分,第4年随访时使用两个任务(Flanker和List)。通过全基因组和转录组关联分析鉴定与各任务相关的基因,并进行遗传相似性计算;与每个任务相关的结构和功能脑指数被确定并用于评估神经相似性。我们发现,在基线(9~10岁),这三个EF成分在行为上高度相互关联,并且与许多相同的基因和相同的大脑区域相关。四年后,随访数据(仅包括Flanker和List任务)仍然显示出显著但较小的行为/遗传/神经相似性。本研究首次通过结合行为、遗传和神经数据绘制了青少年EF分化的路径,该方法可能与其他认知能力发展的研究相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Psychology
Biological Psychology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane. The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信