Safety and efficiency of robot-assisted aspiration and intraoperative lysis without catheterization for deep-seated intracerebral hemorrhage.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Yu-Chi Wang, Ting-Wei Chang, Cheng-Chi Lee, Zhuo-Hao Liu, Bo-An Chen, Ching-Chang Chen
{"title":"Safety and efficiency of robot-assisted aspiration and intraoperative lysis without catheterization for deep-seated intracerebral hemorrhage.","authors":"Yu-Chi Wang, Ting-Wei Chang, Cheng-Chi Lee, Zhuo-Hao Liu, Bo-An Chen, Ching-Chang Chen","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02408-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Functional recovery after minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) varies. In this study, we introduce a novel robot-assisted stereotactic aspiration and lysis procedure to evacuate deep-seated ICH and evaluate the efficiency of improving neurologic outcomes. Adult patients with spontaneous ICH less than 40 mL were prospectively recruited and underwent a novel protocol combining aspiration and lysis through a single trajectory planned and executed with a neurosurgical robot. No catheter drainage was required after each procedure. The clot volume and neurologic assessments including Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were compared before and after surgery. Surgical complications and mortality within 30 days and neurological improvement survival (NIS), defined as the day on which the NIHSS had decreased by 3 points postoperatively, were recorded. Fifty-five patients with a mean clot volume of 25.5 mL and ICH score of 2 were enrolled. The overall reduction rate was 84.3%, which was inversely proportional to the initial volume (-0.42, p = 0.041). One patient (1.8%) had subclinical bleeding postoperatively, however, none of the patients died. Comparisons between before and after surgery showed an increase in GCS (11.7 vs. 13.4, p < 0.001), decrease in NIHSS (17.4 vs. 12.1, p < 0.001), and decrease in mRS (3.6 vs. 3.1, p < 0.001). Right hemisphere ICH was associated with better NIS than left ICH (p = 0.025). Robot-assisted stereotactic aspiration and thrombolysis can effectively improve neurological function in patients with deep-seated ICHs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02408-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Functional recovery after minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) varies. In this study, we introduce a novel robot-assisted stereotactic aspiration and lysis procedure to evacuate deep-seated ICH and evaluate the efficiency of improving neurologic outcomes. Adult patients with spontaneous ICH less than 40 mL were prospectively recruited and underwent a novel protocol combining aspiration and lysis through a single trajectory planned and executed with a neurosurgical robot. No catheter drainage was required after each procedure. The clot volume and neurologic assessments including Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were compared before and after surgery. Surgical complications and mortality within 30 days and neurological improvement survival (NIS), defined as the day on which the NIHSS had decreased by 3 points postoperatively, were recorded. Fifty-five patients with a mean clot volume of 25.5 mL and ICH score of 2 were enrolled. The overall reduction rate was 84.3%, which was inversely proportional to the initial volume (-0.42, p = 0.041). One patient (1.8%) had subclinical bleeding postoperatively, however, none of the patients died. Comparisons between before and after surgery showed an increase in GCS (11.7 vs. 13.4, p < 0.001), decrease in NIHSS (17.4 vs. 12.1, p < 0.001), and decrease in mRS (3.6 vs. 3.1, p < 0.001). Right hemisphere ICH was associated with better NIS than left ICH (p = 0.025). Robot-assisted stereotactic aspiration and thrombolysis can effectively improve neurological function in patients with deep-seated ICHs.

机器人辅助抽吸术中无导管溶解治疗深部脑出血的安全性和有效性。
脑出血微创手术后的功能恢复情况各不相同。在这项研究中,我们介绍了一种新的机器人辅助立体定向抽吸和溶解程序,以排出深层脑出血,并评估改善神经预后的效率。前瞻性招募自发性脑出血小于40 mL的成年患者,并通过神经外科机器人计划和执行的单一轨迹进行新方案的抽吸和溶解。每次手术后均无需置管引流。比较手术前后血凝块体积和神经系统评估,包括格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)和改良Rankin量表(mRS)。记录手术并发症、30天内死亡率和神经系统改善生存率(NIS),定义为NIHSS在术后下降3分的当天。55例患者平均血块体积为25.5 mL, ICH评分为2分。总体降低率为84.3%,与初始体积成反比(-0.42,p = 0.041)。1例(1.8%)患者术后出现亚临床出血,但无患者死亡。手术前后的比较显示GCS升高(11.7比13.4,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信