Impact of Systole Phase on Ventricular Outflow Tract Diameter and Cardiac Output Calculation in Infants Born Preterm: A Clinical Validation Study.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Macarena García-Gozalo, Rema Nagpal, Karl McNamara, Ashraf Kharrat, Poorva Deshpande, Seungwoo Lee, Faith Zhu, Amish Jain
{"title":"Impact of Systole Phase on Ventricular Outflow Tract Diameter and Cardiac Output Calculation in Infants Born Preterm: A Clinical Validation Study.","authors":"Macarena García-Gozalo, Rema Nagpal, Karl McNamara, Ashraf Kharrat, Poorva Deshpande, Seungwoo Lee, Faith Zhu, Amish Jain","doi":"10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate systolic phase-related variation in measurements of right ventricular outflow tract diameter (RVOTd) and left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd) and calculated right ventricular ouput (RVO) and left ventricular output (LVO) on targeted neonatal echocardiography (TNE) and examine their clinical applicability.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Based on the hypothesis that clinically reliable methods would yield RVO equal to LVO in the absence of cardiac shunts, allowing for predefined margin of ±15% mean difference (MD%), RVOTd/LVOTd were retrospectively measured at early systole (ES), mid systole (MS), and late systole (LS) to calculate corresponding RVOs/LVOs, for neonates who had a TNE without detectable shunt over a 6-year period (1 TNE/patient). Percent variability related to the systolic phase at measurement were compared between right- and left-sided measures and between different pairs. MD% (95% CI) were calculated for 9 paired RVO/LVO combinations, and absolute MD (95% limits of agreement) were identified using Bland-Altman analysis (BA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-six neonates were included. Overall, variables varied significantly based on the choice of systolic phase at measurement, greater for the right ventricle (RVOTd vs LVOTd 13.8±6.5% vs 7.5±4.3%, p <0.01; RVO vs LVO 25.3 ± 11.0% vs 14.3 ± 7.9%, p<0.01). A stepwise reduction occurred in all measurements though systole (ES>MS>LS). Of the 9 RVO/LVO pairs, only RVO-LS/LVO-ES showed MD%< ±15% [5.3% (-3.9%,14.6%)] and lowest MD on BA but wide LOA [38 (233, -158) ml/min/kg].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The choice of systolic phase at RVOTd/LVOTd measurement is an important source of variability, needing standardization during output calculations on TNE. RVOTd-LS/LVOTd-ES pair may provide clinically acceptable performance for output calculation in neonates.</p>","PeriodicalId":54774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"114663"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114663","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate systolic phase-related variation in measurements of right ventricular outflow tract diameter (RVOTd) and left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd) and calculated right ventricular ouput (RVO) and left ventricular output (LVO) on targeted neonatal echocardiography (TNE) and examine their clinical applicability.

Study design: Based on the hypothesis that clinically reliable methods would yield RVO equal to LVO in the absence of cardiac shunts, allowing for predefined margin of ±15% mean difference (MD%), RVOTd/LVOTd were retrospectively measured at early systole (ES), mid systole (MS), and late systole (LS) to calculate corresponding RVOs/LVOs, for neonates who had a TNE without detectable shunt over a 6-year period (1 TNE/patient). Percent variability related to the systolic phase at measurement were compared between right- and left-sided measures and between different pairs. MD% (95% CI) were calculated for 9 paired RVO/LVO combinations, and absolute MD (95% limits of agreement) were identified using Bland-Altman analysis (BA).

Results: Fifty-six neonates were included. Overall, variables varied significantly based on the choice of systolic phase at measurement, greater for the right ventricle (RVOTd vs LVOTd 13.8±6.5% vs 7.5±4.3%, p <0.01; RVO vs LVO 25.3 ± 11.0% vs 14.3 ± 7.9%, p<0.01). A stepwise reduction occurred in all measurements though systole (ES>MS>LS). Of the 9 RVO/LVO pairs, only RVO-LS/LVO-ES showed MD%< ±15% [5.3% (-3.9%,14.6%)] and lowest MD on BA but wide LOA [38 (233, -158) ml/min/kg].

Conclusions: The choice of systolic phase at RVOTd/LVOTd measurement is an important source of variability, needing standardization during output calculations on TNE. RVOTd-LS/LVOTd-ES pair may provide clinically acceptable performance for output calculation in neonates.

收缩期对早产儿心室流出道直径和心输出量计算的影响:一项临床验证研究。
目的:探讨新生儿定向超声心动图(TNE)测量右心室流出道直径(RVOTd)和左心室流出道直径(LVOTd)与计算右心室输出量(RVO)和左心室输出量(LVO)的收缩期相关性变化,并探讨其临床适用性。研究设计:基于临床可靠的方法在没有心脏分流的情况下产生RVO等于LVO的假设,允许预定的±15%的平均差值(MD%), RVOTd/LVOTd在收缩期早期(ES),收缩期中期(MS)和收缩期晚期(LS)进行回顾性测量,以计算相应的RVOs/LVOs,这些新生儿在6年的时间里没有检测到分流(1 TNE/患者)。测量时与收缩期相关的变异性百分比在左右侧测量和不同对之间进行比较。计算9对RVO/LVO组合的MD% (95% CI),并使用Bland-Altman分析(BA)确定绝对MD(95%一致限)。结果:共纳入56例新生儿。总体而言,根据测量时收缩期的选择,变量差异显着,右心室更大(RVOTd vs LVOTd 13.8±6.5% vs 7.5±4.3%,p MS>LS)。9对RVO/LVO对中,只有RVO- ls /LVO- es的MD%<±15% [5.3% (-3.9%,14.6%)],BA的MD最低,但LOA较宽[38 (233,-158)ml/min/kg]。结论:RVOTd/LVOTd测量时收缩期的选择是一个重要的变异性来源,在TNE输出计算时需要标准化。RVOTd-LS/LVOTd-ES对新生儿输出量计算可能提供临床可接受的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatrics
Journal of Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
696
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatrics is an international peer-reviewed journal that advances pediatric research and serves as a practical guide for pediatricians who manage health and diagnose and treat disorders in infants, children, and adolescents. The Journal publishes original work based on standards of excellence and expert review. The Journal seeks to publish high quality original articles that are immediately applicable to practice (basic science, translational research, evidence-based medicine), brief clinical and laboratory case reports, medical progress, expert commentary, grand rounds, insightful editorials, “classic” physical examinations, and novel insights into clinical and academic pediatric medicine related to every aspect of child health. Published monthly since 1932, The Journal of Pediatrics continues to promote the latest developments in pediatric medicine, child health, policy, and advocacy. Topics covered in The Journal of Pediatrics include, but are not limited to: General Pediatrics Pediatric Subspecialties Adolescent Medicine Allergy and Immunology Cardiology Critical Care Medicine Developmental-Behavioral Medicine Endocrinology Gastroenterology Hematology-Oncology Infectious Diseases Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Emergency Medicine Pulmonology Rheumatology Genetics Ethics Health Service Research Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信