Persistence of training-induced visual improvements after occipital stroke.

4区 医学 Q3 Neuroscience
Progress in brain research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.12.001
Hanna E Willis, Berkeley Fahrenthold, Rebecca S Millington-Truby, Rebecca Willis, Lucy Starling, Matthew R Cavanaugh, Marco Tamietto, Krystel Huxlin, Holly Bridge
{"title":"Persistence of training-induced visual improvements after occipital stroke.","authors":"Hanna E Willis, Berkeley Fahrenthold, Rebecca S Millington-Truby, Rebecca Willis, Lucy Starling, Matthew R Cavanaugh, Marco Tamietto, Krystel Huxlin, Holly Bridge","doi":"10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Damage to the primary visual cortex causes homonymous visual impairments that appear to benefit from visual discrimination training. However, whether improvements persist without continued training remains to be determined and was the focus of the present study. After a baseline assessment visit, 20 participants trained twice daily in their blind-field for a minimum of six months (median=155 sessions), using a motion discrimination and integration task. At the end of training, a return study visit was used to assess recovery. Three months later, 14 of the participants returned for a third study visit to assess persistence of recovery. At each study visit, motion discrimination and integration thresholds, Humphrey visual fields, and structural MRI scans were collected. Immediately after training, all but four participants showed improvements in the trained discrimination task, and shrinkage of the perimetrically-defined visual defect. While these gains were sustained in seven out of eleven participants who improved with training, four participants lost their improvement in motion discrimination thresholds at the follow-up visit. Persistence of recovery was not related to age, time since lesion, number of training sessions performed, proportion of V1 damaged, deficit size, or optic tract degeneration measured from structural MRI scans. The present findings underscore the potential of extended visual training to induce long-term improvements in stroke-induced vision loss. However, they also highlight the need for further investigations to better understand the mechanisms driving recovery, its persistence post-training, and especially heterogeneity among participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":20598,"journal":{"name":"Progress in brain research","volume":"292 ","pages":"113-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in brain research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.12.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Damage to the primary visual cortex causes homonymous visual impairments that appear to benefit from visual discrimination training. However, whether improvements persist without continued training remains to be determined and was the focus of the present study. After a baseline assessment visit, 20 participants trained twice daily in their blind-field for a minimum of six months (median=155 sessions), using a motion discrimination and integration task. At the end of training, a return study visit was used to assess recovery. Three months later, 14 of the participants returned for a third study visit to assess persistence of recovery. At each study visit, motion discrimination and integration thresholds, Humphrey visual fields, and structural MRI scans were collected. Immediately after training, all but four participants showed improvements in the trained discrimination task, and shrinkage of the perimetrically-defined visual defect. While these gains were sustained in seven out of eleven participants who improved with training, four participants lost their improvement in motion discrimination thresholds at the follow-up visit. Persistence of recovery was not related to age, time since lesion, number of training sessions performed, proportion of V1 damaged, deficit size, or optic tract degeneration measured from structural MRI scans. The present findings underscore the potential of extended visual training to induce long-term improvements in stroke-induced vision loss. However, they also highlight the need for further investigations to better understand the mechanisms driving recovery, its persistence post-training, and especially heterogeneity among participants.

枕脑卒中后训练诱导的视力改善的持续性。
初级视觉皮层的损伤会导致视觉障碍,这似乎得益于视觉辨别训练。然而,在没有持续训练的情况下是否能持续改善仍有待确定,这也是本研究的重点。在基线评估访问后,20名参与者每天在他们的盲区训练两次,持续至少6个月(中位数=155次),使用动作辨别和整合任务。在训练结束时,通过回访来评估恢复情况。三个月后,14名参与者进行了第三次研究访问,以评估恢复的持久性。在每次研究访问中,收集运动辨别和整合阈值、汉弗莱视野和结构MRI扫描。训练结束后,除了四名参与者外,所有参与者在训练后的辨别任务中都有所改善,周围定义的视觉缺陷也有所缩小。虽然在11名通过训练得到改善的参与者中,有7人保持了这些进步,但在随访中,有4名参与者在动作辨别阈值方面失去了改善。恢复的持续时间与年龄、病变时间、训练次数、V1受损比例、缺陷大小或从结构MRI扫描测量的视束变性无关。目前的研究结果强调了延长视力训练的潜力,以诱导中风引起的视力丧失的长期改善。然而,他们也强调需要进一步的调查,以更好地了解驱动恢复的机制,训练后的持续性,特别是参与者之间的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in brain research
Progress in brain research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Brain Research is the most acclaimed and accomplished series in neuroscience. The serial is well-established as an extensive documentation of contemporary advances in the field. The volumes contain authoritative reviews and original articles by invited specialists. The rigorous editing of the volumes assures that they will appeal to all laboratory and clinical brain research workers in the various disciplines: neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, neuroendocrinology, neuropathology, basic neurology, biological psychiatry and the behavioral sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信