Hwee Leong Tan, Yun Zhao, Darren Weiquan Chua, Brian Kim Poh Goh, Ye Xin Koh
{"title":"SEER-based evaluation of lymph node yield as a prognostic indicator of cancer-specific survival in nonmetastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Hwee Leong Tan, Yun Zhao, Darren Weiquan Chua, Brian Kim Poh Goh, Ye Xin Koh","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2025.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Although the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition recommends harvesting at least 12 lymph nodes for optimal staging in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the precise lymph node yield (LNY) needed for accurate prognostication in different treatment settings remains unclear. This study aimed to identify subgroup-specific LNY cutoffs and evaluate their prognostic significance in nonmetastatic PDAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 5609 patients with nonmetastatic PDAC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database undergoing pancreatectomy. Patients were categorized by nodal status (N0 vs. N+) and receipt of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) or upfront surgery (UPS). We used maximum selected rank statistics and a conditional inference tree approach to determine optimal LNY cutoffs for each subgroup. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were employed to assess cancer-specific survival (CSS) and identify independent prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Distinct LNY thresholds were identified for N0 (>13) and N+ (>10) cohorts, with the highest cutoffs in N0-NAT subgroups (>27). Across all analyses, patients exceeding these LNY cutoffs demonstrated significantly prolonged CSS. The N0-NAT group with LNY >27 achieved the longest median survival (60 months), whereas N+ patients undergoing UPS with LNY ≤10 had the poorest outcomes (16 months). Multivariate Cox regressions consistently showed that higher LNY was an independent predictor of improved survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher LNY thresholds than the current AJCC standard of 12 appear beneficial for more accurate staging and improved survival in resected PDAC. Tailoring LNY goals based on nodal status and treatment modality may further refine prognostic stratification and guide more effective therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2025.05.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/objectives: Although the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition recommends harvesting at least 12 lymph nodes for optimal staging in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the precise lymph node yield (LNY) needed for accurate prognostication in different treatment settings remains unclear. This study aimed to identify subgroup-specific LNY cutoffs and evaluate their prognostic significance in nonmetastatic PDAC.
Methods: We analyzed 5609 patients with nonmetastatic PDAC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database undergoing pancreatectomy. Patients were categorized by nodal status (N0 vs. N+) and receipt of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) or upfront surgery (UPS). We used maximum selected rank statistics and a conditional inference tree approach to determine optimal LNY cutoffs for each subgroup. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were employed to assess cancer-specific survival (CSS) and identify independent prognostic factors.
Results: Distinct LNY thresholds were identified for N0 (>13) and N+ (>10) cohorts, with the highest cutoffs in N0-NAT subgroups (>27). Across all analyses, patients exceeding these LNY cutoffs demonstrated significantly prolonged CSS. The N0-NAT group with LNY >27 achieved the longest median survival (60 months), whereas N+ patients undergoing UPS with LNY ≤10 had the poorest outcomes (16 months). Multivariate Cox regressions consistently showed that higher LNY was an independent predictor of improved survival.
Conclusions: Higher LNY thresholds than the current AJCC standard of 12 appear beneficial for more accurate staging and improved survival in resected PDAC. Tailoring LNY goals based on nodal status and treatment modality may further refine prognostic stratification and guide more effective therapeutic strategies.
背景/目的:尽管美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第8版建议胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的最佳分期至少切除12个淋巴结,但在不同治疗环境中准确预测所需的精确淋巴结产量(LNY)仍不清楚。本研究旨在确定亚组特异性LNY截止点,并评估其在非转移性PDAC中的预后意义。方法:我们分析了5609例来自监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的接受胰腺切除术的非转移性PDAC患者。根据淋巴结状态(N0 vs. N+)和接受新辅助治疗(NAT)或前期手术(UPS)对患者进行分类。我们使用最大选择秩统计和条件推理树方法来确定每个子组的最佳LNY截止值。Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox比例风险模型用于评估癌症特异性生存(CSS)和确定独立预后因素。结果:在N0(>3)和N+(>0)队列中发现了不同的LNY阈值,其中N0- nat亚组(>7)的临界值最高。在所有分析中,超过LNY临界值的患者表现出显著延长的CSS。N0-NAT组中位生存期最长(60个月),LNY≤10的N+患者中位生存期最差(16个月)。多变量Cox回归一致显示,较高的LNY是提高生存率的独立预测因子。结论:与目前AJCC标准的12相比,更高的LNY阈值似乎有利于更准确的分期和改善切除的PDAC的生存。根据淋巴结状态和治疗方式定制LNY目标可以进一步细化预后分层并指导更有效的治疗策略。
期刊介绍:
Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.