Surgical Treatment of Basilar Invagination without Evident Atlantoaxial Instability (Type B) - A Systematic Review.

IF 0.9 3区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Neurology India Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-23 DOI:10.4103/neurol-india.Neurol-India-D-24-00457
Andrei Fernandes Joaquim, Eloy Rusafa Neto, Leon Cleres Penido Pinheiro, Osmar Jose Santos de sMoraes, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo, Carlos Gilberto Carloti, Roger Schimdt Brock
{"title":"Surgical Treatment of Basilar Invagination without Evident Atlantoaxial Instability (Type B) - A Systematic Review.","authors":"Andrei Fernandes Joaquim, Eloy Rusafa Neto, Leon Cleres Penido Pinheiro, Osmar Jose Santos de sMoraes, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo, Carlos Gilberto Carloti, Roger Schimdt Brock","doi":"10.4103/neurol-india.Neurol-India-D-24-00457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chiari 1 malformation (CM1) and Basilar Invagination (BI) are the most common congenital bone and neural disorders of the craniovertebral junction. There is still discussion in the literature regarding best treatment practices for Type B BI. This systematic review aims to evaluate the treatment options for symptomatic type B BI especially concerning the need for craniocervical fusion. We performed a systematic literature review, focusing on surgical studies of patients with type B BI that reported the surgical technique used and the clinical outcomes. The MINORS instrument was utilized for methodological quality assessment as well as the level of evidence (LOL) of the included studies. Six studies were included, two of which used similar patients' samples. Posterior fossa decompression (PFD) with or without duroplasty was employed in three studies, C1-2 fusion in one, and C1-2 distraction and fusion in two studies. All reported patients' improvement post-surgery regardless of the technique used. Failure of PFD was associated with bone segmental anomalies in one study, and early deaths were associated with C1-2 fusion. The quality of the included studies was acceptable, with four studies at LOL 4 and two studies at LOL 3. There are varying surgical treatments for type B BI. PFD (most often with duroplasty) is safe and effective for patients without ventral compression. Some authors recommended C1-2 stabilization in all cases, and reported clinical improvement. Until prospective comparative studies, the ideal treatment option for type B BI remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":19429,"journal":{"name":"Neurology India","volume":"73 3","pages":"423-428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology India","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/neurol-india.Neurol-India-D-24-00457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chiari 1 malformation (CM1) and Basilar Invagination (BI) are the most common congenital bone and neural disorders of the craniovertebral junction. There is still discussion in the literature regarding best treatment practices for Type B BI. This systematic review aims to evaluate the treatment options for symptomatic type B BI especially concerning the need for craniocervical fusion. We performed a systematic literature review, focusing on surgical studies of patients with type B BI that reported the surgical technique used and the clinical outcomes. The MINORS instrument was utilized for methodological quality assessment as well as the level of evidence (LOL) of the included studies. Six studies were included, two of which used similar patients' samples. Posterior fossa decompression (PFD) with or without duroplasty was employed in three studies, C1-2 fusion in one, and C1-2 distraction and fusion in two studies. All reported patients' improvement post-surgery regardless of the technique used. Failure of PFD was associated with bone segmental anomalies in one study, and early deaths were associated with C1-2 fusion. The quality of the included studies was acceptable, with four studies at LOL 4 and two studies at LOL 3. There are varying surgical treatments for type B BI. PFD (most often with duroplasty) is safe and effective for patients without ventral compression. Some authors recommended C1-2 stabilization in all cases, and reported clinical improvement. Until prospective comparative studies, the ideal treatment option for type B BI remains unclear.

无明显寰枢椎不稳的颅底内陷的手术治疗(B型)- A系统综述。
Chiari 1畸形(CM1)和颅底凹陷(BI)是颅椎交界处最常见的先天性骨和神经疾病。关于B型BI的最佳治疗实践,文献中仍有讨论。本系统综述旨在评估有症状的B型BI的治疗选择,特别是关于颅颈融合的需要。我们进行了系统的文献综述,重点关注B型BI患者的外科研究,报告了所使用的手术技术和临床结果。使用minor工具进行方法学质量评估以及纳入研究的证据水平(LOL)。其中包括六项研究,其中两项使用了相似的患者样本。3项研究采用后窝减压(PFD)合并或不合并硬脑膜成形术,1项研究采用C1-2融合,2项研究采用C1-2牵张融合。无论采用何种技术,所有患者术后均有改善。在一项研究中,PFD失败与骨节段异常有关,早期死亡与C1-2融合有关。纳入研究的质量是可以接受的,有4项研究的LOL为4,2项研究的LOL为3。B型BI有多种手术治疗方法。PFD(通常伴有硬膜成形术)对于没有腹侧压迫的患者是安全有效的。一些作者推荐所有病例的C1-2稳定,并报道了临床改善。在前瞻性比较研究之前,B型BI的理想治疗方案仍不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology India
Neurology India 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
70.40%
发文量
434
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Neurology India (ISSN 0028-3886) is Bi-monthly publication of Neurological Society of India. Neurology India, the show window of the progress of Neurological Sciences in India, has successfully completed 50 years of publication in the year 2002. ‘Neurology India’, along with the Neurological Society of India, has grown stronger with the passing of every year. The full articles of the journal are now available on internet with more than 20000 visitors in a month and the journal is indexed in MEDLINE and Index Medicus, Current Contents, Neuroscience Citation Index and EMBASE in addition to 10 other indexing avenues. This specialty journal reaches to about 2000 neurologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-psychiatrists, and others working in the fields of neurology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信