American Heart Association Standards for Postacute Stroke Rehabilitation Care.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stroke Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-23 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048942
Joel Stein, Samuel M Bierner, Steve Dentel, Aly Downs, Mark Kovic, Barbara J Lutz, Madeline Pawloski, Kylie Picou, Janna Pietrzak, Sue Pugh, Kathleen Volkman, Kristy Weissling, Richard Zorowitz, Pamela W Duncan
{"title":"American Heart Association Standards for Postacute Stroke Rehabilitation Care.","authors":"Joel Stein, Samuel M Bierner, Steve Dentel, Aly Downs, Mark Kovic, Barbara J Lutz, Madeline Pawloski, Kylie Picou, Janna Pietrzak, Sue Pugh, Kathleen Volkman, Kristy Weissling, Richard Zorowitz, Pamela W Duncan","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence-based rehabilitation and secondary prevention interventions improve poststroke functional recovery and reduce secondary complications. However, stroke rehabilitation expertise, processes of care, and educational resources vary among sites where postacute care (PAC) is delivered. The American Heart Association developed quality standards based on the American Heart Association 2016 Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery to address these gaps. An interdisciplinary PAC standards writing committee identified key areas for PAC: quality improvement, medical management, care coordination, patient/caregiver and personnel education, and program management. Subgroups developed draft standards, combining results from a national landscape survey of PAC sites with clinical practice guidelines. The committee then refined the draft standards using a consensus-based process. American Heart Association staff and PAC sites in Montana convened a learning collaborative to gather feedback and provide gap analyses of the standards relative to current practices. Qualitative input from beta testing in Montana and quantitative results from the nationwide survey and Montana sites were analyzed and used to refine the standards further. The national landscape survey demonstrated that most sites do not meet the proposed standards: stroke program oversight structure (78% fall short), stroke rehabilitation leadership (70%), stroke-specific order sets/protocols (61%), and policies requiring staff stroke education (66%). Regarding Montana findings, 41% of the PAC sites have no mechanisms to identify areas of quality improvement specific to their stroke rehabilitation programs, and 59% do not use standardized tools to ensure that performance improvement initiatives are followed. However, with adequate support and resources, most Montana sites stated that they would be able to meet the proposed standards. We conclude that the Stroke PAC Quality Standards are applicable in PAC settings and provide a pathway to improving access to high-quality care for stroke survivors. Outcome studies are needed to confirm anticipated improvements in medical and functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":"56 6","pages":"1650-1654"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048942","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence-based rehabilitation and secondary prevention interventions improve poststroke functional recovery and reduce secondary complications. However, stroke rehabilitation expertise, processes of care, and educational resources vary among sites where postacute care (PAC) is delivered. The American Heart Association developed quality standards based on the American Heart Association 2016 Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery to address these gaps. An interdisciplinary PAC standards writing committee identified key areas for PAC: quality improvement, medical management, care coordination, patient/caregiver and personnel education, and program management. Subgroups developed draft standards, combining results from a national landscape survey of PAC sites with clinical practice guidelines. The committee then refined the draft standards using a consensus-based process. American Heart Association staff and PAC sites in Montana convened a learning collaborative to gather feedback and provide gap analyses of the standards relative to current practices. Qualitative input from beta testing in Montana and quantitative results from the nationwide survey and Montana sites were analyzed and used to refine the standards further. The national landscape survey demonstrated that most sites do not meet the proposed standards: stroke program oversight structure (78% fall short), stroke rehabilitation leadership (70%), stroke-specific order sets/protocols (61%), and policies requiring staff stroke education (66%). Regarding Montana findings, 41% of the PAC sites have no mechanisms to identify areas of quality improvement specific to their stroke rehabilitation programs, and 59% do not use standardized tools to ensure that performance improvement initiatives are followed. However, with adequate support and resources, most Montana sites stated that they would be able to meet the proposed standards. We conclude that the Stroke PAC Quality Standards are applicable in PAC settings and provide a pathway to improving access to high-quality care for stroke survivors. Outcome studies are needed to confirm anticipated improvements in medical and functional outcomes.

美国心脏协会急性中风后康复护理标准。
循证康复和二级预防干预可改善脑卒中后功能恢复并减少继发并发症。然而,中风康复的专业知识、护理过程和教育资源在提供急性后护理(PAC)的地点各不相同。美国心脏协会根据美国心脏协会2016年成人中风康复和恢复指南制定了质量标准,以解决这些差距。一个跨学科PAC标准编写委员会确定了PAC的关键领域:质量改进、医疗管理、护理协调、患者/护理人员和人员教育以及项目管理。小组制定了标准草案,结合了PAC地点的全国景观调查结果和临床实践指南。然后,委员会使用基于共识的程序对标准草案进行了完善。美国心脏协会的工作人员和蒙大拿州的PAC组织了一次学习合作,以收集反馈,并提供与当前实践相关的标准差距分析。蒙大拿州beta测试的定性输入和全国调查和蒙大拿州站点的定量结果进行了分析,并用于进一步完善标准。全国景观调查显示,大多数场所不符合建议的标准:中风项目监督结构(78%),中风康复领导(70%),中风特定命令集/协议(61%),以及要求员工中风教育的政策(66%)。关于蒙大拿州的调查结果,41%的PAC站点没有机制来确定针对其中风康复项目的质量改进领域,59%的站点没有使用标准化工具来确保绩效改进计划的实施。然而,有了足够的支持和资源,蒙大拿州的大多数遗址都表示他们能够达到拟议的标准。我们得出结论,卒中PAC质量标准适用于PAC设置,并为卒中幸存者提供了改善获得高质量护理的途径。需要进行结果研究,以确认预期的医疗和功能结果的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信