Automated ventricular segmentation in pediatric hydrocephalus: how close are we?

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Birra R Taha, Gaoxiang Luo, Anant Naik, Luke Sabal, Ju Sun, Robert A McGovern, Carolina Sandoval-Garcia, Daniel J Guillaume
{"title":"Automated ventricular segmentation in pediatric hydrocephalus: how close are we?","authors":"Birra R Taha, Gaoxiang Luo, Anant Naik, Luke Sabal, Ju Sun, Robert A McGovern, Carolina Sandoval-Garcia, Daniel J Guillaume","doi":"10.3171/2025.2.PEDS24590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The explosive growth of available high-quality imaging data coupled with new progress in hardware capabilities has enabled a new era of unprecedented performance in brain segmentation tasks. Despite the explosion of new data released by consortiums and groups around the world, most published, closed, or openly available segmentation models have either a limited or an unknown role in pediatric brains. This study explores the utility of state-of-the-art automated ventricular segmentation tools applied to pediatric hydrocephalus. Two popular, fast, whole-brain segmentation tools were used (FastSurfer and QuickNAT) to automatically segment the lateral ventricles and evaluate their accuracy in children with hydrocephalus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty scans from 32 patients were included in this study. The patients underwent imaging at the University of Minnesota Medical Center or satellite clinics, were between 0 and 18 years old, had an ICD-10 diagnosis that included the word hydrocephalus, and had at least one T1-weighted pre- or postcontrast MPRAGE sequence. Patients with poor quality scans were excluded. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) scores were used to compare segmentation outputs against manually segmented lateral ventricles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, both models performed poorly with DSCs of 0.61 for each segmentation tool. No statistically significant difference was noted between model performance (p = 0.86). Using a multivariate linear regression to examine factors associated with higher DSC performance, male gender (p = 0.66), presence of ventricular catheter (p = 0.72), and MRI magnet strength (p = 0.23) were not statistically significant factors. However, younger age (p = 0.03) and larger ventricular volumes (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with lower DSC values. A large-scale visualization of 196 scans in both models showed characteristic patterns of segmentation failure in larger ventricles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant gaps exist in current cutting-edge segmentation models when applied to pediatric hydrocephalus. Researchers will need to address these types of gaps in performance through thoughtful consideration of their training data before reaching the ultimate goal of clinical deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.2.PEDS24590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The explosive growth of available high-quality imaging data coupled with new progress in hardware capabilities has enabled a new era of unprecedented performance in brain segmentation tasks. Despite the explosion of new data released by consortiums and groups around the world, most published, closed, or openly available segmentation models have either a limited or an unknown role in pediatric brains. This study explores the utility of state-of-the-art automated ventricular segmentation tools applied to pediatric hydrocephalus. Two popular, fast, whole-brain segmentation tools were used (FastSurfer and QuickNAT) to automatically segment the lateral ventricles and evaluate their accuracy in children with hydrocephalus.

Methods: Forty scans from 32 patients were included in this study. The patients underwent imaging at the University of Minnesota Medical Center or satellite clinics, were between 0 and 18 years old, had an ICD-10 diagnosis that included the word hydrocephalus, and had at least one T1-weighted pre- or postcontrast MPRAGE sequence. Patients with poor quality scans were excluded. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) scores were used to compare segmentation outputs against manually segmented lateral ventricles.

Results: Overall, both models performed poorly with DSCs of 0.61 for each segmentation tool. No statistically significant difference was noted between model performance (p = 0.86). Using a multivariate linear regression to examine factors associated with higher DSC performance, male gender (p = 0.66), presence of ventricular catheter (p = 0.72), and MRI magnet strength (p = 0.23) were not statistically significant factors. However, younger age (p = 0.03) and larger ventricular volumes (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with lower DSC values. A large-scale visualization of 196 scans in both models showed characteristic patterns of segmentation failure in larger ventricles.

Conclusions: Significant gaps exist in current cutting-edge segmentation models when applied to pediatric hydrocephalus. Researchers will need to address these types of gaps in performance through thoughtful consideration of their training data before reaching the ultimate goal of clinical deployment.

小儿脑积水的自动心室分割:我们有多接近?
目的:高质量成像数据的爆炸性增长,加上硬件能力的新进步,使大脑分割任务进入了前所未有的性能新时代。尽管世界各地的协会和团体发布了大量新数据,但大多数已发表的、封闭的或公开可用的分割模型在儿童大脑中的作用有限或未知。本研究探讨了应用于小儿脑积水的最先进的自动心室分割工具的效用。使用两种流行的快速全脑分割工具(FastSurfer和QuickNAT)自动分割侧脑室并评估其在脑积水儿童中的准确性。方法:本研究包括32例患者的40次扫描。患者在明尼苏达大学医学中心或卫星诊所接受影像学检查,年龄在0 - 18岁之间,ICD-10诊断包括脑积水一词,并且至少有一个t1加权对比前或对比后MPRAGE序列。扫描质量差的患者被排除在外。骰子相似系数(DSC)分数用于比较分割输出与手动分割侧脑室。结果:总体而言,两种模型都表现不佳,每种分割工具的dsc为0.61。模型性能差异无统计学意义(p = 0.86)。采用多元线性回归检验与DSC表现较高相关的因素,男性性别(p = 0.66)、心室导管的存在(p = 0.72)和MRI磁体强度(p = 0.23)是无统计学意义的因素。然而,较年轻(p = 0.03)和较大的心室容积(p = 0.01)与较低的DSC值显著相关。两种模型的196次大规模可视化扫描显示了较大心室分割失败的特征模式。结论:目前的尖端分割模型在应用于儿童脑积水时存在显著差距。在达到临床部署的最终目标之前,研究人员需要通过对训练数据的深思熟虑来解决这些类型的性能差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
307
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Information not localiced
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信