Effect of cecal intubation rate on post colonoscopy colorectal cancer deaths and detection of colorectal cancer precursors.

IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Elisabeth Waldmann, Lisa-Maria Rockenbauer, Alexandra Demschik, Andreas Klinger, Daniela Penz, Michael Trauner, Monika Ferlitsch
{"title":"Effect of cecal intubation rate on post colonoscopy colorectal cancer deaths and detection of colorectal cancer precursors.","authors":"Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Elisabeth Waldmann, Lisa-Maria Rockenbauer, Alexandra Demschik, Andreas Klinger, Daniela Penz, Michael Trauner, Monika Ferlitsch","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2025.01.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>The visualization of the whole colonic mucosa with complete colonoscopy including cecal intubation has been accepted as a quality parameter for screening colonoscopy. However, there is little evidence regarding the cecal intubation rate (CIR) and its association with long-term patient outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did a linkage of individuals that participated in an Austrian Colonoscopy Quality Assurance Program to the Austrian death registry to obtain information on deaths of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC). We performed logistic regression and time-to-event analyses to estimate the association the CIR with the probability to detect adenomas or proximal serrated polyps and the hazards for PCCRC death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>349782 screening participants between 01/2012 and 12/2022 were included. With every one percentage point increase in the CIR, the probability to detect an adenoma increased by one percentage point (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.0 - 1.01, p <0.001) and increased by three percentage points to detect a proximal serrated polyp (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.04, p<0.001). There was a significantly lower risk for PCCRC death when endoscopists had a CIR of 95%-100% (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.33 - 0.59, p <0.001), compared to endoscopists with a CIR < 90% or 90% - 95%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>the endoscopist's cecal intubation rate is strongly associated with their ability to detect adenomas and proximal serrated polyps. A CIR of 95-100% was associated with the lowest hazards for PCCRC death. Based on this data, a CIR above 95% is the desirable target.</p>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2025.01.035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims: The visualization of the whole colonic mucosa with complete colonoscopy including cecal intubation has been accepted as a quality parameter for screening colonoscopy. However, there is little evidence regarding the cecal intubation rate (CIR) and its association with long-term patient outcome.

Methods: We did a linkage of individuals that participated in an Austrian Colonoscopy Quality Assurance Program to the Austrian death registry to obtain information on deaths of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC). We performed logistic regression and time-to-event analyses to estimate the association the CIR with the probability to detect adenomas or proximal serrated polyps and the hazards for PCCRC death.

Results: 349782 screening participants between 01/2012 and 12/2022 were included. With every one percentage point increase in the CIR, the probability to detect an adenoma increased by one percentage point (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.0 - 1.01, p <0.001) and increased by three percentage points to detect a proximal serrated polyp (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.04, p<0.001). There was a significantly lower risk for PCCRC death when endoscopists had a CIR of 95%-100% (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.33 - 0.59, p <0.001), compared to endoscopists with a CIR < 90% or 90% - 95%.

Conclusions: the endoscopist's cecal intubation rate is strongly associated with their ability to detect adenomas and proximal serrated polyps. A CIR of 95-100% was associated with the lowest hazards for PCCRC death. Based on this data, a CIR above 95% is the desirable target.

盲肠插管率对结肠镜术后结直肠癌死亡及结直肠癌前体检测的影响。
背景与目的:包括盲肠插管在内的全结肠镜检查显示整个结肠粘膜已被公认为是筛查结肠镜检查的质量参数。然而,很少有证据表明盲肠插管率(CIR)及其与患者长期预后的关系。方法:我们将参加奥地利结肠镜检查质量保证计划的个体与奥地利死亡登记处联系起来,以获取结肠镜检查后结直肠癌(PCCRC)死亡的信息。我们进行了逻辑回归和事件时间分析,以估计CIR与发现腺瘤或近端锯齿状息肉的概率以及PCCRC死亡危险之间的关系。结果:2012年1月至2022年12月期间纳入349782名筛查参与者。CIR每增加1个百分点,发现腺瘤的概率就增加1个百分点(OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.0 - 1.01, p)。结论:内镜医师的盲肠插管率与他们发现腺瘤和近端锯齿状息肉的能力密切相关。CIR为95-100%与PCCRC死亡风险最低相关。根据这些数据,CIR高于95%是理想的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
903
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion. As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信