Amanda M. Palmer PhD , Reid DeMass MS , Alana M. Rojewski PhD , Evan M. Bagley PhD , Matthew J. Carpenter PhD , Tracy T. Smith PhD , Benjamin A. Toll PhD
{"title":"Augmented Doses of Nicotine Replacement Therapy: Feasibility for Dual Cigarette and E-Cigarette Cessation","authors":"Amanda M. Palmer PhD , Reid DeMass MS , Alana M. Rojewski PhD , Evan M. Bagley PhD , Matthew J. Carpenter PhD , Tracy T. Smith PhD , Benjamin A. Toll PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Dual use of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes is common and has harmful health effects. Many who dual use want to quit, but there are no empirically supported dual cessation interventions. High-dose nicotine replacement therapy is effective for treating heavy smoking and may be applied to treating dual use of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this pilot feasibility trial, individuals using both combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes who wanted to quit were randomly assigned to a 28-day supply of nicotine replacement therapy in one of 3 doses: Standard (21mg patch, <em>qd</em> + 4mg lozenge prn [minimum of 5, up to 20/day]); Mid (21mg patch + 14mg patch + 4mg lozenge [5–30/day]), or High (2 × 21mg patches + 4mg lozenges [5–40/day]). Participants reported combustible cigarette and e-cigarette use daily throughout treatment and 1-month follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants enrolled in the study (N=46 from 2023 to 2024, analyzed 2025) had high nicotine dependence and most completed study procedures. Participants in the Mid group reported using nicotine replacement therapy on more days relative to the other groups. Participants in Mid and High reported numerically higher 7-day point-prevalence dual abstinence at end of treatment (13% for both groups vs 6% Standard) and follow-up (33% for both groups vs 0% Standard). Generaelized estimating equation models showed a significantly higher likelihood of abstinence on a given day for the Mid and High groups relative to Standard (<em>p</em>s<0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Augmented doses of nicotine replacement therapy are a feasible, promising treatment for dual cessation of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Future research should evaluate this approach in a more rigorous, fully powered trial.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><div>This study is registered at <span><span>www.clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> NCT06087328.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":"69 2","pages":"Article 107664"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379725001564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Dual use of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes is common and has harmful health effects. Many who dual use want to quit, but there are no empirically supported dual cessation interventions. High-dose nicotine replacement therapy is effective for treating heavy smoking and may be applied to treating dual use of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes.
Methods
In this pilot feasibility trial, individuals using both combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes who wanted to quit were randomly assigned to a 28-day supply of nicotine replacement therapy in one of 3 doses: Standard (21mg patch, qd + 4mg lozenge prn [minimum of 5, up to 20/day]); Mid (21mg patch + 14mg patch + 4mg lozenge [5–30/day]), or High (2 × 21mg patches + 4mg lozenges [5–40/day]). Participants reported combustible cigarette and e-cigarette use daily throughout treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Results
Participants enrolled in the study (N=46 from 2023 to 2024, analyzed 2025) had high nicotine dependence and most completed study procedures. Participants in the Mid group reported using nicotine replacement therapy on more days relative to the other groups. Participants in Mid and High reported numerically higher 7-day point-prevalence dual abstinence at end of treatment (13% for both groups vs 6% Standard) and follow-up (33% for both groups vs 0% Standard). Generaelized estimating equation models showed a significantly higher likelihood of abstinence on a given day for the Mid and High groups relative to Standard (ps<0.05).
Conclusions
Augmented doses of nicotine replacement therapy are a feasible, promising treatment for dual cessation of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Future research should evaluate this approach in a more rigorous, fully powered trial.
Trial Registration
This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT06087328.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.