Amanda M Palmer, Reid DeMass, Alana M Rojewski, Evan M Bagley, Matthew J Carpenter, Tracy T Smith, Benjamin A Toll
{"title":"Augmented Doses of Nicotine Replacement Therapy: Feasibility for Dual Cigarette and E-cigarette Cessation.","authors":"Amanda M Palmer, Reid DeMass, Alana M Rojewski, Evan M Bagley, Matthew J Carpenter, Tracy T Smith, Benjamin A Toll","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dual use of combustible cigarettes (CC) and e-cigarettes (EC) is common and has harmful health effects. Many who dual use want to quit, but there are no empirically supported dual cessation interventions. High dose nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is effective for treating heavy smoking and may be applied to treating dual use of CC and EC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this pilot feasibility trial, individuals using both CC and EC who wanted to quit were randomly assigned to a 28-day supply of NRT in one of three doses: Standard (21mg patch, qd + 4mg lozenge prn [minimum of 5, up to 20/day]); Mid (21mg patch + 14mg patch + 4mg lozenge [5-30/day]), or High (2 × 21mg patches + 4mg lozenges [5-40/day]). Participants reported CC and EC use daily throughout treatment and 1-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants enrolled in the study (N=46 from 2023-2024, analyzed 2025) had high nicotine dependence and most completed study procedures. Participants in the Mid group reported using NRT on more days relative to the other groups. Participants in Mid and High reported numerically higher 7-day point-prevalence dual abstinence at end of treatment (13% for both groups vs 6% Standard) and follow-up (33% for both groups vs 0% Standard). GEE models showed a significantly higher likelihood of abstinence on a given day for the Mid and High groups relative to Standard (ps<.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Augmented doses of NRT are a feasible, promising treatment for dual cessation of CC and EC. Future research should evaluate this approach in a more rigorous, fully powered trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"107664"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107664","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Dual use of combustible cigarettes (CC) and e-cigarettes (EC) is common and has harmful health effects. Many who dual use want to quit, but there are no empirically supported dual cessation interventions. High dose nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is effective for treating heavy smoking and may be applied to treating dual use of CC and EC.
Methods: In this pilot feasibility trial, individuals using both CC and EC who wanted to quit were randomly assigned to a 28-day supply of NRT in one of three doses: Standard (21mg patch, qd + 4mg lozenge prn [minimum of 5, up to 20/day]); Mid (21mg patch + 14mg patch + 4mg lozenge [5-30/day]), or High (2 × 21mg patches + 4mg lozenges [5-40/day]). Participants reported CC and EC use daily throughout treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Results: Participants enrolled in the study (N=46 from 2023-2024, analyzed 2025) had high nicotine dependence and most completed study procedures. Participants in the Mid group reported using NRT on more days relative to the other groups. Participants in Mid and High reported numerically higher 7-day point-prevalence dual abstinence at end of treatment (13% for both groups vs 6% Standard) and follow-up (33% for both groups vs 0% Standard). GEE models showed a significantly higher likelihood of abstinence on a given day for the Mid and High groups relative to Standard (ps<.05).
Conclusions: Augmented doses of NRT are a feasible, promising treatment for dual cessation of CC and EC. Future research should evaluate this approach in a more rigorous, fully powered trial.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.