Interobserver agreement in scoring HER2-negative and HER2-low immunohistochemistry in breast cancer: Reasons for discordance and impact of a single training session.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Yun-An Tseng, Steffanie Tamayo, Evi Abada, Shivali Marketkar, Linda C Hanley, Katrine Hansen, M Ruhul Quddus, C James Sung, Kamaljeet Singh
{"title":"Interobserver agreement in scoring HER2-negative and HER2-low immunohistochemistry in breast cancer: Reasons for discordance and impact of a single training session.","authors":"Yun-An Tseng, Steffanie Tamayo, Evi Abada, Shivali Marketkar, Linda C Hanley, Katrine Hansen, M Ruhul Quddus, C James Sung, Kamaljeet Singh","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqaf043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the DESTINY-Breast04 trial, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low (HER2-L) is defined as an HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ with negative fluorescence in situ hybridization. Limited data report poor agreement in scoring HER2-0 vs 1+. We aim to investigate the HER2 IHC concordance rate, with focus on HER2-0 vs HER2-L groups. We evaluate the impact of a single training session on concordance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine breast pathologists from the same institution reviewed 60 HER2 IHC stains on breast biopsy specimens in 2 rounds of 30 cases each. An educational slide review session was provided between the 2 rounds. Interobserver Cohen κ values were computed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall complete agreement for HER2 IHC was noted in 37 (62%) of 60 cases, with similar agreement in the first round (19/30 [63%]) and second round (18/30 [60%]). For all 60 cases, κ values ranged from .517 to .895, with 92% of κ values in substantial agreement or better range. For combined HER2-0 and HER2-L cases, κ values ranged from .298 to .826, with only 45% of κ values in substantial agreement or better range. In HER2-L only cases, 50% of the scorer pairs of κ values were 0 or less (no agreement), and only 14% of pairs showed substantial or better agreement. The educational session did not improve the κ values. Faint and heterogeneous HER2 expression, cytoplasmic blush, dislodged cells, and in situ component led to poor concordance in HER2-0 vs HER2-L.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Poor concordance on HER2-0 vs HER2-L and lack of improvement after a training session likely suggest ineffective HER2 IHC expression range in HER2 low spectrum.</p>","PeriodicalId":7506,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaf043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In the DESTINY-Breast04 trial, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low (HER2-L) is defined as an HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ with negative fluorescence in situ hybridization. Limited data report poor agreement in scoring HER2-0 vs 1+. We aim to investigate the HER2 IHC concordance rate, with focus on HER2-0 vs HER2-L groups. We evaluate the impact of a single training session on concordance.

Methods: Nine breast pathologists from the same institution reviewed 60 HER2 IHC stains on breast biopsy specimens in 2 rounds of 30 cases each. An educational slide review session was provided between the 2 rounds. Interobserver Cohen κ values were computed and compared.

Results: Overall complete agreement for HER2 IHC was noted in 37 (62%) of 60 cases, with similar agreement in the first round (19/30 [63%]) and second round (18/30 [60%]). For all 60 cases, κ values ranged from .517 to .895, with 92% of κ values in substantial agreement or better range. For combined HER2-0 and HER2-L cases, κ values ranged from .298 to .826, with only 45% of κ values in substantial agreement or better range. In HER2-L only cases, 50% of the scorer pairs of κ values were 0 or less (no agreement), and only 14% of pairs showed substantial or better agreement. The educational session did not improve the κ values. Faint and heterogeneous HER2 expression, cytoplasmic blush, dislodged cells, and in situ component led to poor concordance in HER2-0 vs HER2-L.

Conclusions: Poor concordance on HER2-0 vs HER2-L and lack of improvement after a training session likely suggest ineffective HER2 IHC expression range in HER2 low spectrum.

乳腺癌中her2阴性和her2低免疫组化评分的观察者间一致性:不一致的原因和单次训练的影响
目的:在destiny - breast - 04试验中,人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)低(HER2- l)被定义为HER2免疫组织化学(IHC)评分为1+或2+,荧光原位杂交阴性。有限的数据显示HER2-0和1+评分不一致。我们的目的是研究HER2 IHC的一致性率,重点是HER2-0组和HER2- l组。我们评估单个培训课程对一致性的影响。方法:来自同一机构的9名乳腺病理学家对60例乳腺活检标本的HER2 IHC染色进行了2轮检查,每轮30例。在两轮之间提供了一个教育幻灯片复习环节。计算并比较观察者间的Cohen κ值。结果:60例患者中有37例(62%)的HER2 IHC总体完全一致,第一轮(19/30[63%])和第二轮(18/30[60%])也有类似的一致。在所有60例中,κ值范围为0.517至0.895,92%的κ值在基本一致或更好的范围内。对于HER2-0和HER2-L合并的病例,κ值范围从0.298到0.826,只有45%的κ值在基本一致或更好的范围内。在仅HER2-L的病例中,50%的评分对的κ值为0或更低(无一致性),只有14%的评分对表现出基本或更好的一致性。教育课程没有提高κ值。微弱且异质性的HER2表达、细胞质脸红、细胞移位和原位成分导致HER2-0与HER2- l的一致性较差。结论:HER2-0和HER2- l的一致性差,训练后缺乏改善,可能表明HER2低谱IHC表达范围无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP) is the official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists. It is a leading international journal for publication of articles concerning novel anatomic pathology and laboratory medicine observations on human disease. AJCP emphasizes articles that focus on the application of evolving technologies for the diagnosis and characterization of diseases and conditions, as well as those that have a direct link toward improving patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信