Risk factors for error in refractive astigmatism after toric intraocular lens implantation in Chinese patients.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Mengyao Zhang, Rui Qin, Yanfeng Liao, Qianqian Ji, Ying Hong
{"title":"Risk factors for error in refractive astigmatism after toric intraocular lens implantation in Chinese patients.","authors":"Mengyao Zhang, Rui Qin, Yanfeng Liao, Qianqian Ji, Ying Hong","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04127-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the risk factors for postoperative error in refractive astigmatism (ERA) in Chinese patients with cataract and astigmatism undergoing toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study. 132 patients who underwent cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation performed by a single surgeon at Peking University Third Hospital Department of Ophthalmology were enrolled. The Barrett Toric Calculator was used to calculate IOL power. Data collected included the patient's best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal curvature, central anterior chamber depth (ACD), axial length (AL), incision position, and IOL sphere and cylinder diopters. Corrected visual acuity, ERA, corneal curvature and ACD were collected 1 month after operation. All the participants were divided into two groups according to ERA(whether within 0.5 D or not).Logistic regression was performed to analyze the risk factors for postoperative ERA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>112 of the 132 patients (84.8%) had a < 0.5 D postoperative ERA. Logistic regression model showed that older age (OR = 1.102, 95% CI: 1.019-1.192), longer AL (OR = 1.611 95% CI: 1.069-2.429), and higher ΔACD (OR = 4.035, 95% CI: 1.086-15.00) were independent risk factors for postoperative ERA. However, gender, preoperative astigmatism, incision position were not independent risk factors for ERA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Factors contributing to ERA after toric IOL implantation include age, AL and ACD change before and after the surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"309"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04127-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the risk factors for postoperative error in refractive astigmatism (ERA) in Chinese patients with cataract and astigmatism undergoing toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

Methods: Retrospective study. 132 patients who underwent cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation performed by a single surgeon at Peking University Third Hospital Department of Ophthalmology were enrolled. The Barrett Toric Calculator was used to calculate IOL power. Data collected included the patient's best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal curvature, central anterior chamber depth (ACD), axial length (AL), incision position, and IOL sphere and cylinder diopters. Corrected visual acuity, ERA, corneal curvature and ACD were collected 1 month after operation. All the participants were divided into two groups according to ERA(whether within 0.5 D or not).Logistic regression was performed to analyze the risk factors for postoperative ERA.

Results: 112 of the 132 patients (84.8%) had a < 0.5 D postoperative ERA. Logistic regression model showed that older age (OR = 1.102, 95% CI: 1.019-1.192), longer AL (OR = 1.611 95% CI: 1.069-2.429), and higher ΔACD (OR = 4.035, 95% CI: 1.086-15.00) were independent risk factors for postoperative ERA. However, gender, preoperative astigmatism, incision position were not independent risk factors for ERA.

Conclusions: Factors contributing to ERA after toric IOL implantation include age, AL and ACD change before and after the surgery.

中国患者环形人工晶状体植入术后屈光不正的危险因素。
背景:探讨中国白内障和散光患者行环形人工晶状体植入术后屈光性散光(ERA)发生差错的危险因素。方法:回顾性研究。选取北京大学第三医院眼科同一位外科医生行白内障手术并环形人工晶状体植入术的132例患者。使用Barrett托力计算器计算人工晶状体度数。收集的数据包括患者最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、角膜曲率、中央前房深度(ACD)、眼轴长度(AL)、切口位置、人工晶状体球体和圆柱体屈光度。术后1个月采集矫正视力、ERA、角膜曲度、ACD。所有参与者根据ERA分为两组(不论是否在0.5 D以内)。采用Logistic回归分析术后ERA的危险因素。结果:132例患者中有112例(84.8%)发生ERA。结论:影响人工晶状体植入术后ERA的因素包括年龄、术前、术后AL和ACD的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信