Adaptation of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) to a Polish version and validation in patients with upper limb musculoskeletal disorders.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Agnieszka Bejer, Jędrzej Płocki, Marek Kulczyk, Markus Melloh
{"title":"Adaptation of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) to a Polish version and validation in patients with upper limb musculoskeletal disorders.","authors":"Agnieszka Bejer, Jędrzej Płocki, Marek Kulczyk, Markus Melloh","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08758-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is a robust, widely used tool for assessing the functional status of the upper limbs (ULs) and the effectiveness of interventions in patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the ULFI into Polish (ULFI-PL) and evaluate its psychometric properties and practical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 127 patients (54% female, <math><mover><mi>x</mi> <mo>¯</mo></mover> </math>  = 45.07 ± 14.97 years) with various ULMSDs and symptom durations completed the ULFI-PL, the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire-Polish version (QuickDASH-PL), the Polish version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF-PL), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and the seven-point Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale. The internal consistency, construct validity, and factor structure were assessed in all the participants; the test-retest reliability and measurement error were evaluated in a subgroup (n = 112, 2-3-day interval); and the responsiveness and interpretability were evaluated in another subgroup (n = 56, 8-week interval, after physiotherapy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ULFI-PL demonstrated a good internal consistency (α = 0.77) and high construct validity, supported by the confirmation of five out of six a priori hypotheses (83.33%). A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed a unidimensional structure. It also demonstrated a high test-retest reliability (r = 0.85). The measurement error was calculated using the standard error of measurement (SEM = 4.75%) and the minimal detectable change (MDC<sub>95</sub> = 13.17%). The ULFI-PL showed a high responsiveness after physiotherapy, which was confirmed by the effect size (ES = 2.08) and the standardized response mean (SRM = 1.88). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the ULFI-PL was 28.29% (95% CI: 24.96-31.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ULFI-PL is a reliable, valid, and responsive tool for assessing the upper limb function in Polish-speaking patients with ULMSDs and is suitable for use in both clinical and research contexts. The results are consistent with previous studies on the original English version and other language adaptations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"506"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08758-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is a robust, widely used tool for assessing the functional status of the upper limbs (ULs) and the effectiveness of interventions in patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the ULFI into Polish (ULFI-PL) and evaluate its psychometric properties and practical characteristics.

Methods: A total of 127 patients (54% female, x ¯  = 45.07 ± 14.97 years) with various ULMSDs and symptom durations completed the ULFI-PL, the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire-Polish version (QuickDASH-PL), the Polish version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF-PL), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and the seven-point Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale. The internal consistency, construct validity, and factor structure were assessed in all the participants; the test-retest reliability and measurement error were evaluated in a subgroup (n = 112, 2-3-day interval); and the responsiveness and interpretability were evaluated in another subgroup (n = 56, 8-week interval, after physiotherapy).

Results: The ULFI-PL demonstrated a good internal consistency (α = 0.77) and high construct validity, supported by the confirmation of five out of six a priori hypotheses (83.33%). A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed a unidimensional structure. It also demonstrated a high test-retest reliability (r = 0.85). The measurement error was calculated using the standard error of measurement (SEM = 4.75%) and the minimal detectable change (MDC95 = 13.17%). The ULFI-PL showed a high responsiveness after physiotherapy, which was confirmed by the effect size (ES = 2.08) and the standardized response mean (SRM = 1.88). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the ULFI-PL was 28.29% (95% CI: 24.96-31.63).

Conclusions: The ULFI-PL is a reliable, valid, and responsive tool for assessing the upper limb function in Polish-speaking patients with ULMSDs and is suitable for use in both clinical and research contexts. The results are consistent with previous studies on the original English version and other language adaptations.

上肢功能指数(ULFI)适应波兰版本和上肢肌肉骨骼疾病患者的验证。
背景:上肢功能指数(ULFI)是一个强大的、广泛使用的工具,用于评估上肢功能状态(ULs)和肌肉骨骼疾病(MSDs)患者干预措施的有效性。本研究旨在将ULFI翻译成波兰语(ULFI- pl)并进行文化改编,并评估其心理测量特性和实用特征。方法:共有127例不同ULMSDs和症状持续时间的患者(54%为女性,x¯= 45.07±14.97岁)完成ULFI-PL、手臂、肩部和手部残疾缩短问卷-波兰版(QuickDASH-PL)、世界卫生组织生活质量bref波兰版(WHOQOL-BREF-PL)、数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS)和7分全球变化评定量表(GRC)。对所有被试进行内部一致性、构念效度和因子结构评估;在一个亚组中评估重测信度和测量误差(n = 112,间隔2-3天);在另一个亚组(n = 56,间隔8周,理疗后)评估反应性和可解释性。结果:ULFI-PL具有良好的内部一致性(α = 0.77)和较高的结构效度,6个先验假设中有5个被证实(83.33%)。验证性因子分析(CFA)显示单维结构。该方法具有较高的重测信度(r = 0.85)。采用测量标准误差(SEM = 4.75%)和最小可检测变化(MDC95 = 13.17%)计算测量误差。物理治疗后ULFI-PL表现出较高的反应性,效应量(ES = 2.08)和标准化反应均值(SRM = 1.88)证实了这一点。ULFI-PL的最小临床重要差异(MCID)为28.29% (95% CI: 24.96-31.63)。结论:ULFI-PL是评估波兰语ULMSDs患者上肢功能的可靠、有效和反应灵敏的工具,适用于临床和研究。这一结果与之前对英语原版和其他语言改编的研究一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信