The validity and reliability of the emotional consequences of elder abuse scale for Turkish language.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Serap Buztepe, Cantürk Çapik
{"title":"The validity and reliability of the emotional consequences of elder abuse scale for Turkish language.","authors":"Serap Buztepe, Cantürk Çapik","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-06026-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the 13-item Emotional Consequences of Elder Abuse Scale (ECEAS) among elderly individuals in Türkiye.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This methodological study was conducted in three phases: (1) adaptation of the scale to the Turkish language with a back-translation process, (2) content validity assessment by a panel of experts, and (3) psychometric evaluations including factor analysis, validity coefficient calculation, and item-total correlation analysis. The sample consisted of 145 elderly individuals aged between 64 and 88, recruited from the Atatürk University Health Application and Research Center Physical Therapy Clinic. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews conducted between September and December 2023. To ensure randomization, a lottery method was applied, selecting individuals whose citizenship numbers ended in odd digits. Inclusion criteria were individuals aged 65 or older, who were caregivers, and mentally competent. Data were gathered using a demographic information form and the Emotional Consequences of Elder Abuse Scale. The demographic form contained 14 items, while the ECEAS, which consists of 1 dimension and 13 items, was utilized to assess the emotional impacts of elder abuse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the Emotional Consequences of Elder Abuse Scale had 6 factors in its original form, it was decided to have one single sub-dimension in the Turkish version. All fit index values of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis were found to be acceptable (x<sup>2</sup>/df = 3.13, p > 0.05, AGFI = 0.97, GFI = 0.98, CFI = 1.00, RMSEA = 0.022, SRMR = 0.075). The reliability coefficient of the Turkish version of the Emotional Consequences of Elder Abuse Scale was 0.911 and item-total correlations were between 0.54-0.79. In examining the suitability of the scale for factor analysis, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient was 0.896 and Bartlett's Sphericity Test result was x<sup>2</sup> = 1035.559 (p = 0.000). The factor loads of all items of the scale were above 0.30 and the explained variance was 49.737%. The factor loads of the model were found to be 0.33-0.83 and the t-value of all items was > 1.96 (3.86-13.26). In evaluating the internal consistency of the scales, reliability values were found to be 0.817 for the first half and 0.876 for the second half. Also, the correlation between the two halves of the scale was 0.791, the Spearman-Brown Coefficient was 0.883, and the Guttmann Split-Half Coefficient was 0.882.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results showed that the scale is a valid and reliable tool to be used to determine the emotional consequences of elder abuse in Turkish elderly individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"369"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06026-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the 13-item Emotional Consequences of Elder Abuse Scale (ECEAS) among elderly individuals in Türkiye.

Material and methods: This methodological study was conducted in three phases: (1) adaptation of the scale to the Turkish language with a back-translation process, (2) content validity assessment by a panel of experts, and (3) psychometric evaluations including factor analysis, validity coefficient calculation, and item-total correlation analysis. The sample consisted of 145 elderly individuals aged between 64 and 88, recruited from the Atatürk University Health Application and Research Center Physical Therapy Clinic. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews conducted between September and December 2023. To ensure randomization, a lottery method was applied, selecting individuals whose citizenship numbers ended in odd digits. Inclusion criteria were individuals aged 65 or older, who were caregivers, and mentally competent. Data were gathered using a demographic information form and the Emotional Consequences of Elder Abuse Scale. The demographic form contained 14 items, while the ECEAS, which consists of 1 dimension and 13 items, was utilized to assess the emotional impacts of elder abuse.

Results: Although the Emotional Consequences of Elder Abuse Scale had 6 factors in its original form, it was decided to have one single sub-dimension in the Turkish version. All fit index values of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis were found to be acceptable (x2/df = 3.13, p > 0.05, AGFI = 0.97, GFI = 0.98, CFI = 1.00, RMSEA = 0.022, SRMR = 0.075). The reliability coefficient of the Turkish version of the Emotional Consequences of Elder Abuse Scale was 0.911 and item-total correlations were between 0.54-0.79. In examining the suitability of the scale for factor analysis, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient was 0.896 and Bartlett's Sphericity Test result was x2 = 1035.559 (p = 0.000). The factor loads of all items of the scale were above 0.30 and the explained variance was 49.737%. The factor loads of the model were found to be 0.33-0.83 and the t-value of all items was > 1.96 (3.86-13.26). In evaluating the internal consistency of the scales, reliability values were found to be 0.817 for the first half and 0.876 for the second half. Also, the correlation between the two halves of the scale was 0.791, the Spearman-Brown Coefficient was 0.883, and the Guttmann Split-Half Coefficient was 0.882.

Conclusion: The results showed that the scale is a valid and reliable tool to be used to determine the emotional consequences of elder abuse in Turkish elderly individuals.

土耳其语老年人虐待情绪后果量表的效度和信度。
目的:本研究的目的是评估 rkiye老年人虐待情绪后果量表(ECEAS)的效度和信度。材料和方法:本方法学研究分三个阶段进行:(1)通过反译过程使量表适应土耳其语;(2)由专家小组进行内容效度评估;(3)心理测量学评估,包括因子分析、效度系数计算和项目总量相关分析。样本包括145名年龄在64岁至88岁之间的老年人,他们来自atatrk大学健康应用与研究中心物理治疗诊所。数据是在2023年9月至12月期间通过面对面访谈收集的。为了确保随机化,采用了摇号的方法,选择公民身份号码以奇数结尾的个人。纳入标准是年龄在65岁或以上、照顾者和有精神能力的个体。数据是通过人口统计信息表和虐待老人的情绪后果量表收集的。人口统计表包含14个项目,而ECEAS则由1个维度和13个项目组成,用于评估虐待老年人的情感影响。结果:虽然《虐待老人情绪后果量表》原量表有6个因素,但在土耳其语版本中决定只设一个子维度。验证性因子分析的所有拟合指数值均可接受(x2/df = 3.13, p > 0.05, AGFI = 0.97, GFI = 0.98, CFI = 1.00, RMSEA = 0.022, SRMR = 0.075)。土耳其版虐待老人情绪后果量表的信度系数为0.911,项目-总相关系数为0.54 ~ 0.79。在检验量表是否适合因子分析时,Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin系数为0.896,Bartlett球性检验结果x2 = 1035.559 (p = 0.000)。量表各题项的因子负荷均在0.30以上,解释方差为49.737%。模型的因子负荷为0.33 ~ 0.83,各项目的t值为1.96(3.86 ~ 13.26)。在评估量表的内部一致性时,发现前半部分的信度值为0.817,后半部分的信度值为0.876。量表两半之间的相关系数为0.791,Spearman-Brown系数为0.883,Guttmann Split-Half系数为0.882。结论:结果表明,量表是一个有效和可靠的工具,用于确定老年人虐待的情绪后果在土耳其老年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信