Water quality and soil nutrient availability trade-offs associated with timing and duration of managed flooding for migratory waterbird habitat

A. Chatterjee, J. M. Taylor, Q. D. Read, M. T. Moore, M. A. Locke, J. D. Hoeksema
{"title":"Water quality and soil nutrient availability trade-offs associated with timing and duration of managed flooding for migratory waterbird habitat","authors":"A. Chatterjee,&nbsp;J. M. Taylor,&nbsp;Q. D. Read,&nbsp;M. T. Moore,&nbsp;M. A. Locke,&nbsp;J. D. Hoeksema","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Controlled fall and winter flooding of cropland for migratory shorebird and waterfowl habitat may reduce nutrients in runoff, but the impact of anoxic conditions under corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.)–soybean (<i>Glycine max</i>) rotation due to flooding is not well studied. Influences of fall and/or winter flooding on total soil carbon (C), total and inorganic soil nitrogen (N), Mehlich 3-extractable soil nutrients, including phosphorus (P), and soil exoenzyme activities, including aryl sulfatase and β-N-acetyl-glucosaminidase (NAG), were compared before (September) and after (February) flooding. Five flood treatments were distributed across three farms under corn–soybean rotation. Treatments included control or no flooding, passive rainfall capture, fall flood, winter flood, and fall through winter (FW) flooding. Flooding decreased suspended solids (SS), total and dissolved P, and inorganic N concentrations in runoff water during storm events. Soil pH, total soil C and N, and inorganic N increased between pre- and post-flooding time in all treatments. Soil available-P decreased in FW treatments, but remaining P availability was still not limiting for crop production. The magnitude of increased NAG activity was lower in fields experiencing winter flooding. While fall-winter flooding decreased available P, fall or winter only flooding did not induce significant changes in soil nutrient availability, and all three management options provided significant reductions in runoff nutrient concentrations across three different farms in the Mississippi Alluvial Plain.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Controlled fall and winter flooding of cropland for migratory shorebird and waterfowl habitat may reduce nutrients in runoff, but the impact of anoxic conditions under corn (Zea mays L.)–soybean (Glycine max) rotation due to flooding is not well studied. Influences of fall and/or winter flooding on total soil carbon (C), total and inorganic soil nitrogen (N), Mehlich 3-extractable soil nutrients, including phosphorus (P), and soil exoenzyme activities, including aryl sulfatase and β-N-acetyl-glucosaminidase (NAG), were compared before (September) and after (February) flooding. Five flood treatments were distributed across three farms under corn–soybean rotation. Treatments included control or no flooding, passive rainfall capture, fall flood, winter flood, and fall through winter (FW) flooding. Flooding decreased suspended solids (SS), total and dissolved P, and inorganic N concentrations in runoff water during storm events. Soil pH, total soil C and N, and inorganic N increased between pre- and post-flooding time in all treatments. Soil available-P decreased in FW treatments, but remaining P availability was still not limiting for crop production. The magnitude of increased NAG activity was lower in fields experiencing winter flooding. While fall-winter flooding decreased available P, fall or winter only flooding did not induce significant changes in soil nutrient availability, and all three management options provided significant reductions in runoff nutrient concentrations across three different farms in the Mississippi Alluvial Plain.

水质和土壤养分可用性与迁徙水鸟栖息地管理洪水的时间和持续时间有关
对迁徙滨鸟和水禽栖息地的农田进行秋冬洪水控制可能会减少径流中的营养物质,但洪水对玉米(Zea mays L.) -大豆(Glycine max)轮作缺氧条件的影响尚未得到充分研究。比较了秋冬洪水对土壤全碳(C)、土壤全氮和无机氮(N)、土壤Mehlich 3可提取养分(P)、土壤芳基硫酸盐酶和β-N-乙酰氨基葡萄糖苷酶(NAG)等土壤外酶活性的影响。玉米-大豆轮作下,5个防洪处理分布在3个农田。处理包括控制或不淹水、被动降雨捕获、秋季洪水、冬季洪水和秋冬(FW)洪水。暴雨期间,洪水降低了径流水中悬浮固体(SS)、总磷和溶解磷以及无机氮的浓度。各处理土壤pH、全碳、全氮和无机氮在淹水前后均呈上升趋势。土壤有效磷在FW处理下降低,但剩余有效磷仍不限制作物生产。在遭受冬季洪水的地区,NAG活性增加的幅度较低。虽然秋冬洪水减少了有效磷,但秋冬洪水并没有引起土壤养分有效性的显著变化,并且所有三种管理方案都显著降低了密西西比冲积平原三个不同农场的径流养分浓度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信