Bence Dániel Kovács, Kim João de Jesus Gregersen, Lars-Flemming Pedersen
{"title":"Effective nitrification and removal of particulate organic matter in biofilters with compressible polyurethane foam","authors":"Bence Dániel Kovács, Kim João de Jesus Gregersen, Lars-Flemming Pedersen","doi":"10.1016/j.aquaeng.2025.102563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluated the treatment efficiency and backwashing capabilities of a novel fixed-bed biofilter utilizing compressible polyurethane foam media. The novelty of the biofilter system lies in its custom-designed backwashing mechanism, in which the foam media is mechanically compressed to remove retained solids. The system was tested at two hydraulic retention times (HRTs), 2.4 min (low HRT) and 16 min (high HRT), within a pilot-scale freshwater recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) stocked with rainbow trout over an 18-week period. Assessment included single-pass removal efficiencies and volume-specific removal rates based on inlet–outlet concentrations, as well as particulate matter retention rates derived from sludge collected during backwashing. Results demonstrated immediate treatment effectiveness, operational simplicity, and practical applicability. High HRT reactors consistently achieved higher single-pass removal efficiencies, with peak reductions of 90 % for total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), 66 % for nitrite-nitrogen (NO₂-N), 64 % (Bactiquant) and 48 % (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> degradation assay) for bacterial activity, 44 % for turbidity, and a 10 percentage point improvement in ultraviolet transmittance (UVT) — approximately 1.5–3.5 times higher than values observed in low HRT reactors. Conversely, low HRT reactors outperformed in terms of volume-specific TAN and NO₂-N removal rates (67.9 ± 18.6 g TAN/m³/day; 22.5 ± 12.5 g NO₂-N/m³/day), due to increased substrate loading. Low HRT reactors also retained more particulate organic matter in sludge, with average retention rates of 38.2 ± 1.1 g/week for dry matter and 25.7 ± 1.2 g/week for total chemical oxygen demand (COD), compared to 24.8 ± 0.7 g/week and 7.7 ± 0.7 g/week under high HRT, respectively. Backwashing enhanced nitrification without compromising the system stability, however, a temporary reduction in NO₂-N removal was observed following a four-week operational pause.</div><div>Overall, this type of fixed-bed biofilter concept demonstrates strong potential for aquaculture applications, offering rapid effectiveness, operational resilience, and modular flexibility for continuous or intermittent treatment of nitrogenous compounds and particulate matter.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8120,"journal":{"name":"Aquacultural Engineering","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 102563"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquacultural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144860925000524","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluated the treatment efficiency and backwashing capabilities of a novel fixed-bed biofilter utilizing compressible polyurethane foam media. The novelty of the biofilter system lies in its custom-designed backwashing mechanism, in which the foam media is mechanically compressed to remove retained solids. The system was tested at two hydraulic retention times (HRTs), 2.4 min (low HRT) and 16 min (high HRT), within a pilot-scale freshwater recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) stocked with rainbow trout over an 18-week period. Assessment included single-pass removal efficiencies and volume-specific removal rates based on inlet–outlet concentrations, as well as particulate matter retention rates derived from sludge collected during backwashing. Results demonstrated immediate treatment effectiveness, operational simplicity, and practical applicability. High HRT reactors consistently achieved higher single-pass removal efficiencies, with peak reductions of 90 % for total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), 66 % for nitrite-nitrogen (NO₂-N), 64 % (Bactiquant) and 48 % (H2O2 degradation assay) for bacterial activity, 44 % for turbidity, and a 10 percentage point improvement in ultraviolet transmittance (UVT) — approximately 1.5–3.5 times higher than values observed in low HRT reactors. Conversely, low HRT reactors outperformed in terms of volume-specific TAN and NO₂-N removal rates (67.9 ± 18.6 g TAN/m³/day; 22.5 ± 12.5 g NO₂-N/m³/day), due to increased substrate loading. Low HRT reactors also retained more particulate organic matter in sludge, with average retention rates of 38.2 ± 1.1 g/week for dry matter and 25.7 ± 1.2 g/week for total chemical oxygen demand (COD), compared to 24.8 ± 0.7 g/week and 7.7 ± 0.7 g/week under high HRT, respectively. Backwashing enhanced nitrification without compromising the system stability, however, a temporary reduction in NO₂-N removal was observed following a four-week operational pause.
Overall, this type of fixed-bed biofilter concept demonstrates strong potential for aquaculture applications, offering rapid effectiveness, operational resilience, and modular flexibility for continuous or intermittent treatment of nitrogenous compounds and particulate matter.
期刊介绍:
Aquacultural Engineering is concerned with the design and development of effective aquacultural systems for marine and freshwater facilities. The journal aims to apply the knowledge gained from basic research which potentially can be translated into commercial operations.
Problems of scale-up and application of research data involve many parameters, both physical and biological, making it difficult to anticipate the interaction between the unit processes and the cultured animals. Aquacultural Engineering aims to develop this bioengineering interface for aquaculture and welcomes contributions in the following areas:
– Engineering and design of aquaculture facilities
– Engineering-based research studies
– Construction experience and techniques
– In-service experience, commissioning, operation
– Materials selection and their uses
– Quantification of biological data and constraints