Sarah Wangui Muiruri , Anna Birgitte Milford , Kyrre Rickertsen
{"title":"Norwegian consumption of plant-based meat analogues","authors":"Sarah Wangui Muiruri , Anna Birgitte Milford , Kyrre Rickertsen","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plant-based meat analogues (PBMA) are expected to reduce environmental, health, and animal welfare challenges from the production and consumption of meat. This paper investigates PBMA consumption using three rounds of a survey. PBMA consumption in Norway increased from 2017 to 2019 but stagnated in 2022. Several food choice motives and socioeconomic factors affected consumption consistently across the survey rounds. Emphasizing the environment, animal welfare, and novelty were positively associated with PBMA consumption, while emphasizing familiarity and Norwegian origin were negatively associated. Younger, higher educated, urban, and vegetarian respondents were more likely to consume PBMA. Use of social media had a positive effect on the consumption for the total sample, but it was not stable across the survey rounds. Producers, marketers, and other policy makers could promote the environmental and animal welfare benefits along with the novelty aspects of PBMA. The use of domestic ingredients could also appeal to older and rural individuals who emphasize food familiarity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 105597"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325001727","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Plant-based meat analogues (PBMA) are expected to reduce environmental, health, and animal welfare challenges from the production and consumption of meat. This paper investigates PBMA consumption using three rounds of a survey. PBMA consumption in Norway increased from 2017 to 2019 but stagnated in 2022. Several food choice motives and socioeconomic factors affected consumption consistently across the survey rounds. Emphasizing the environment, animal welfare, and novelty were positively associated with PBMA consumption, while emphasizing familiarity and Norwegian origin were negatively associated. Younger, higher educated, urban, and vegetarian respondents were more likely to consume PBMA. Use of social media had a positive effect on the consumption for the total sample, but it was not stable across the survey rounds. Producers, marketers, and other policy makers could promote the environmental and animal welfare benefits along with the novelty aspects of PBMA. The use of domestic ingredients could also appeal to older and rural individuals who emphasize food familiarity.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.