Performance of PREVENT and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-Year ASCVD risk in the UK Biobank

IF 4.3 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Matthew Ambrosio , Pamela L. Alebna , Terence Lee , Alec Friedman , Nicholas WS Chew , Carolyn Burns , Phillip Duncan , W. Gregory Hundley , Le Kang , Anurag Mehta
{"title":"Performance of PREVENT and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-Year ASCVD risk in the UK Biobank","authors":"Matthew Ambrosio ,&nbsp;Pamela L. Alebna ,&nbsp;Terence Lee ,&nbsp;Alec Friedman ,&nbsp;Nicholas WS Chew ,&nbsp;Carolyn Burns ,&nbsp;Phillip Duncan ,&nbsp;W. Gregory Hundley ,&nbsp;Le Kang ,&nbsp;Anurag Mehta","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) were created in 2013 to assess ASCVD risk in primary prevention. In 2023 the American Heart Association published the PREVENT equations to assess the risk of cardiovascular disease in primary prevention. The comparative performance of PCE and PREVENT for predicting 10-year ASCVD risk has not been evaluated in an external large-scale epidemiologic cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study population includes participants of the UK Biobank who were free of clinical cardiovascular disease. 10-year ASCVD risk was calculated using the PCE and PREVENT equations. Harrel’s C-Statistics and delta C-Statistics were calculated for males and females to evaluate risk discrimination. Predicted 10-year risks were divided into deciles as well as risk groups for each equation and stratified by sex to compare predicted risk versus observed risk within each risk group, with calibration slopes calculated by decile. Sensitivity and specificity were also analyzed to assess statin eligibility.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final cohort was 368,125 individuals ages 40–73 (mean age 56.2, 54.7 % female, 94.0 % white). The C-statistics for PCE were 0.729 (0.722–0.736) for females and 0.688 (0.683–0.693) for males; C-Statistics for PREVENT were 0.728 (0.721–0.735) for females and 0.687 (0.682–0.692) for males, with delta C-Statistics being 0.001 (<em>p</em> = 0.87) for females and 0.001 (<em>p</em> = 0.82) for males. Predicted risks were closer to observed risks for PREVENT as compared to PCE, and PREVENT tended to estimate lower risk (mean risk of 4.6 % compared to 8.3 % for PCE). PREVENT demonstrated higher specificity but lower sensitivity than PCE using the current 7.5 % risk threshold for statin eligibility, and a Youden index of 4.5 % risk was found for PREVENT.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is no significant difference in 10-year ASCVD risk discrimination between PCE and PREVENT equations. However, the PREVENT equations demonstrate better calibration in the UK Biobank.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 101009"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725000844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) were created in 2013 to assess ASCVD risk in primary prevention. In 2023 the American Heart Association published the PREVENT equations to assess the risk of cardiovascular disease in primary prevention. The comparative performance of PCE and PREVENT for predicting 10-year ASCVD risk has not been evaluated in an external large-scale epidemiologic cohort.

Methods

The study population includes participants of the UK Biobank who were free of clinical cardiovascular disease. 10-year ASCVD risk was calculated using the PCE and PREVENT equations. Harrel’s C-Statistics and delta C-Statistics were calculated for males and females to evaluate risk discrimination. Predicted 10-year risks were divided into deciles as well as risk groups for each equation and stratified by sex to compare predicted risk versus observed risk within each risk group, with calibration slopes calculated by decile. Sensitivity and specificity were also analyzed to assess statin eligibility.

Results

The final cohort was 368,125 individuals ages 40–73 (mean age 56.2, 54.7 % female, 94.0 % white). The C-statistics for PCE were 0.729 (0.722–0.736) for females and 0.688 (0.683–0.693) for males; C-Statistics for PREVENT were 0.728 (0.721–0.735) for females and 0.687 (0.682–0.692) for males, with delta C-Statistics being 0.001 (p = 0.87) for females and 0.001 (p = 0.82) for males. Predicted risks were closer to observed risks for PREVENT as compared to PCE, and PREVENT tended to estimate lower risk (mean risk of 4.6 % compared to 8.3 % for PCE). PREVENT demonstrated higher specificity but lower sensitivity than PCE using the current 7.5 % risk threshold for statin eligibility, and a Youden index of 4.5 % risk was found for PREVENT.

Conclusions

There is no significant difference in 10-year ASCVD risk discrimination between PCE and PREVENT equations. However, the PREVENT equations demonstrate better calibration in the UK Biobank.
英国生物银行预测10年ASCVD风险的prevention和合并队列方程的性能
合并队列方程(PCE)创建于2013年,用于评估初级预防中ASCVD的风险。2023年,美国心脏协会发布了预防方程式,以评估初级预防中心血管疾病的风险。PCE和prevention在预测10年ASCVD风险方面的比较性能尚未在外部大规模流行病学队列中进行评估。方法研究人群包括无临床心血管疾病的英国生物银行参与者。使用PCE和PREVENT方程计算10年ASCVD风险。计算男性和女性的Harrel’s C-Statistics和delta C-Statistics来评估风险歧视。预测的10年风险被分为十分位数和每个方程的风险组,并按性别分层,以比较每个风险组内的预测风险和观察风险,并按十分位数计算校准斜率。敏感性和特异性也进行了分析,以评估他汀类药物的适用性。结果最终队列为368,125例,年龄40-73岁,平均年龄56.2岁,女性54.7%,白人94.0%。女性PCE的c统计量为0.729(0.722 ~ 0.736),男性为0.688 (0.683 ~ 0.693);女性的C-Statistics为0.728(0.721-0.735),男性为0.687(0.682-0.692),女性的δ C-Statistics为0.001 (p = 0.87),男性为0.001 (p = 0.82)。与PCE相比,预防的预测风险更接近观察到的风险,并且预防倾向于估计更低的风险(平均风险为4.6%,而PCE为8.3%)。使用目前7.5%的他汀类药物资格风险阈值,prevention显示出更高的特异性,但比PCE更低的敏感性,并且发现prevention的约登风险指数为4.5%。结论PCE方程与PREVENT方程在10年ASCVD风险判别上无显著差异。然而,PREVENT方程在英国生物银行中显示出更好的校准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信