{"title":"The impact of self-access web-based instruction on EFL learners' pragmatic awareness of email requests to faculty","authors":"Sonia López-Serrano","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research has shown that EFL university students have difficulties identifying what is appropriate in email requests to faculty. As a response to this need to develop students' awareness of how to write status-congruent request emails in English, a small body of research has started to investigate the effects of pedagogical interventions on email request pragmatics, finding positive results for in-class instruction. The present study intends to contribute to this line of research by investigating the extent to which students' pragmatic awareness may improve as a result of instruction delivered through a self-access web-based module. In addition, the study investigates whether instruction helps students' appropriateness perceptions become more aligned with those of university lecturers. Participants were 70 EFL first-year students at a public university in Spain. Their development of pragmatic awareness was measured through a perception task that included three email requests that contained pragmatic infelicities and aggravators. Students rated email appropriateness on a four-point Likert scale and wrote justifications of such ratings. Our data showed that their ratings of appropriateness were significantly different from the pre- to the post-test, and that the post-test ratings were more aligned to those of university lecturers in the case of higher imposition requests. In addition, after instruction participants were able to identify more pragmatic infelicities, and their written answers showed a higher awareness of pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic factors. The present study thus supports the beneficial effects of pragmatic instruction that is delivered through a self-access web-based module included within an English university course.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"243 ","pages":"Pages 24-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625001134","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research has shown that EFL university students have difficulties identifying what is appropriate in email requests to faculty. As a response to this need to develop students' awareness of how to write status-congruent request emails in English, a small body of research has started to investigate the effects of pedagogical interventions on email request pragmatics, finding positive results for in-class instruction. The present study intends to contribute to this line of research by investigating the extent to which students' pragmatic awareness may improve as a result of instruction delivered through a self-access web-based module. In addition, the study investigates whether instruction helps students' appropriateness perceptions become more aligned with those of university lecturers. Participants were 70 EFL first-year students at a public university in Spain. Their development of pragmatic awareness was measured through a perception task that included three email requests that contained pragmatic infelicities and aggravators. Students rated email appropriateness on a four-point Likert scale and wrote justifications of such ratings. Our data showed that their ratings of appropriateness were significantly different from the pre- to the post-test, and that the post-test ratings were more aligned to those of university lecturers in the case of higher imposition requests. In addition, after instruction participants were able to identify more pragmatic infelicities, and their written answers showed a higher awareness of pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic factors. The present study thus supports the beneficial effects of pragmatic instruction that is delivered through a self-access web-based module included within an English university course.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.