The impact of self-access web-based instruction on EFL learners' pragmatic awareness of email requests to faculty

IF 1.8 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Sonia López-Serrano
{"title":"The impact of self-access web-based instruction on EFL learners' pragmatic awareness of email requests to faculty","authors":"Sonia López-Serrano","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research has shown that EFL university students have difficulties identifying what is appropriate in email requests to faculty. As a response to this need to develop students' awareness of how to write status-congruent request emails in English, a small body of research has started to investigate the effects of pedagogical interventions on email request pragmatics, finding positive results for in-class instruction. The present study intends to contribute to this line of research by investigating the extent to which students' pragmatic awareness may improve as a result of instruction delivered through a self-access web-based module. In addition, the study investigates whether instruction helps students' appropriateness perceptions become more aligned with those of university lecturers. Participants were 70 EFL first-year students at a public university in Spain. Their development of pragmatic awareness was measured through a perception task that included three email requests that contained pragmatic infelicities and aggravators. Students rated email appropriateness on a four-point Likert scale and wrote justifications of such ratings. Our data showed that their ratings of appropriateness were significantly different from the pre- to the post-test, and that the post-test ratings were more aligned to those of university lecturers in the case of higher imposition requests. In addition, after instruction participants were able to identify more pragmatic infelicities, and their written answers showed a higher awareness of pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic factors. The present study thus supports the beneficial effects of pragmatic instruction that is delivered through a self-access web-based module included within an English university course.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"243 ","pages":"Pages 24-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625001134","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research has shown that EFL university students have difficulties identifying what is appropriate in email requests to faculty. As a response to this need to develop students' awareness of how to write status-congruent request emails in English, a small body of research has started to investigate the effects of pedagogical interventions on email request pragmatics, finding positive results for in-class instruction. The present study intends to contribute to this line of research by investigating the extent to which students' pragmatic awareness may improve as a result of instruction delivered through a self-access web-based module. In addition, the study investigates whether instruction helps students' appropriateness perceptions become more aligned with those of university lecturers. Participants were 70 EFL first-year students at a public university in Spain. Their development of pragmatic awareness was measured through a perception task that included three email requests that contained pragmatic infelicities and aggravators. Students rated email appropriateness on a four-point Likert scale and wrote justifications of such ratings. Our data showed that their ratings of appropriateness were significantly different from the pre- to the post-test, and that the post-test ratings were more aligned to those of university lecturers in the case of higher imposition requests. In addition, after instruction participants were able to identify more pragmatic infelicities, and their written answers showed a higher awareness of pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic factors. The present study thus supports the beneficial effects of pragmatic instruction that is delivered through a self-access web-based module included within an English university course.
网络自助教学对英语学习者对教师电子邮件请求语用意识的影响
研究表明,英语大学的学生很难确定在给教师的电子邮件请求中什么是合适的。作为对培养学生如何用英语写状态一致请求电子邮件意识这一需求的回应,一小部分研究开始调查教学干预对电子邮件请求语用的影响,并在课堂教学中发现了积极的结果。本研究旨在通过调查学生的语用意识在多大程度上可以通过一个基于网络的自我访问模块的教学而得到改善,从而为这一研究方向做出贡献。此外,该研究还调查了教学是否有助于学生对得体性的看法与大学讲师的看法更加一致。参与者是西班牙一所公立大学的70名英语一年级学生。他们的语用意识的发展是通过一项感知任务来衡量的,该任务包括三个包含语用缺陷和加重因素的电子邮件请求。学生们按照李克特四分制对电子邮件的适当性进行评分,并写下对这些评分的理由。我们的数据显示,他们对适当性的评分与测试前和测试后的评分有显著差异,并且测试后的评分与大学讲师在更高要求的情况下的评分更一致。此外,经过指导后,参与者能够识别出更多的语用缺陷,他们的书面回答显示出对语用语言学和社会语用因素的更高认识。因此,本研究支持通过英语大学课程中包含的基于网络的自我访问模块提供语用教学的有益效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信