“Then electricity theft would end, nobody loves stealing”: Community-based solutions for improving electricity access in informal settlements in Kampala, Uganda

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jessica Kersey , Civian Kiki Massa , Judith Mbabazi , Paul Kyoma Asiimwe , Lydia Letaru , Michael Jurua , Bulenza Sirezi , June Lukuyu , Elena van Hove , Peter Mwesiga , Jay Taneja , Nathan G. Johnson , Paul Isolo Mukwaya , Daniel M. Kammen , Laura H. Kwong
{"title":"“Then electricity theft would end, nobody loves stealing”: Community-based solutions for improving electricity access in informal settlements in Kampala, Uganda","authors":"Jessica Kersey ,&nbsp;Civian Kiki Massa ,&nbsp;Judith Mbabazi ,&nbsp;Paul Kyoma Asiimwe ,&nbsp;Lydia Letaru ,&nbsp;Michael Jurua ,&nbsp;Bulenza Sirezi ,&nbsp;June Lukuyu ,&nbsp;Elena van Hove ,&nbsp;Peter Mwesiga ,&nbsp;Jay Taneja ,&nbsp;Nathan G. Johnson ,&nbsp;Paul Isolo Mukwaya ,&nbsp;Daniel M. Kammen ,&nbsp;Laura H. Kwong","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite generally high rates of grid connectivity in African cities, electricity access among users in informal settlements remains heavily constrained. This study explores the challenges that restrict electricity access and use across 25 informal settlements in Kampala, Uganda using a mixed-methods participatory action research (PAR) approach conducted by an inter- and transdisciplinary team. We find that the high cost of electricity, a complex and expensive utility connection process, weak renter protections, an unstable power supply, the poor condition and coverage of distribution infrastructure, and a lack of trust and communication between communities and electricity service providers were substantial barriers to electricity access and use. We present solutions that were identified and evaluated during a series of collaborative workshops with community members and other stakeholders. The study documents the research process as an application of PAR to topics of energy justice and infrastructural citizenship in urban informal settlements. By focusing on the lived experiences of residents, this work demonstrates the value of integrating local knowledge and collaborative problem-solving into energy research and policy. Our results demonstrate how the insights from PAR can enrich traditional infrastructure planning and management processes to foster more equitable, just, and democratic energy transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 104143"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite generally high rates of grid connectivity in African cities, electricity access among users in informal settlements remains heavily constrained. This study explores the challenges that restrict electricity access and use across 25 informal settlements in Kampala, Uganda using a mixed-methods participatory action research (PAR) approach conducted by an inter- and transdisciplinary team. We find that the high cost of electricity, a complex and expensive utility connection process, weak renter protections, an unstable power supply, the poor condition and coverage of distribution infrastructure, and a lack of trust and communication between communities and electricity service providers were substantial barriers to electricity access and use. We present solutions that were identified and evaluated during a series of collaborative workshops with community members and other stakeholders. The study documents the research process as an application of PAR to topics of energy justice and infrastructural citizenship in urban informal settlements. By focusing on the lived experiences of residents, this work demonstrates the value of integrating local knowledge and collaborative problem-solving into energy research and policy. Our results demonstrate how the insights from PAR can enrich traditional infrastructure planning and management processes to foster more equitable, just, and democratic energy transitions.
“这样偷电就会结束,没有人喜欢偷电”:乌干达坎帕拉非正式定居点改善电力供应的社区解决方案
尽管非洲城市的电网连接率普遍较高,但非正规住区用户的电力接入仍然受到严重限制。本研究通过一个跨学科和跨学科团队开展的混合方法参与式行动研究(PAR)方法,探讨了乌干达坎帕拉25个非正式定居点限制电力获取和使用的挑战。我们发现,高昂的电力成本、复杂而昂贵的公用事业连接过程、薄弱的租户保护、不稳定的电力供应、配电基础设施的条件差和覆盖范围广,以及社区和电力服务提供商之间缺乏信任和沟通,都是电力获取和使用的重大障碍。在与社区成员和其他利益相关者的一系列合作研讨会上,我们提出了确定和评估的解决方案。该研究记录了研究过程,将PAR应用于城市非正式住区的能源正义和基础设施公民身份等主题。通过关注居民的生活经验,这项工作展示了将当地知识和协作解决问题整合到能源研究和政策中的价值。我们的研究结果表明,PAR的见解可以丰富传统的基础设施规划和管理流程,以促进更公平、公正和民主的能源转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信