“Then electricity theft would end, nobody loves stealing”: Community-based solutions for improving electricity access in informal settlements in Kampala, Uganda
Jessica Kersey , Civian Kiki Massa , Judith Mbabazi , Paul Kyoma Asiimwe , Lydia Letaru , Michael Jurua , Bulenza Sirezi , June Lukuyu , Elena van Hove , Peter Mwesiga , Jay Taneja , Nathan G. Johnson , Paul Isolo Mukwaya , Daniel M. Kammen , Laura H. Kwong
{"title":"“Then electricity theft would end, nobody loves stealing”: Community-based solutions for improving electricity access in informal settlements in Kampala, Uganda","authors":"Jessica Kersey , Civian Kiki Massa , Judith Mbabazi , Paul Kyoma Asiimwe , Lydia Letaru , Michael Jurua , Bulenza Sirezi , June Lukuyu , Elena van Hove , Peter Mwesiga , Jay Taneja , Nathan G. Johnson , Paul Isolo Mukwaya , Daniel M. Kammen , Laura H. Kwong","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite generally high rates of grid connectivity in African cities, electricity access among users in informal settlements remains heavily constrained. This study explores the challenges that restrict electricity access and use across 25 informal settlements in Kampala, Uganda using a mixed-methods participatory action research (PAR) approach conducted by an inter- and transdisciplinary team. We find that the high cost of electricity, a complex and expensive utility connection process, weak renter protections, an unstable power supply, the poor condition and coverage of distribution infrastructure, and a lack of trust and communication between communities and electricity service providers were substantial barriers to electricity access and use. We present solutions that were identified and evaluated during a series of collaborative workshops with community members and other stakeholders. The study documents the research process as an application of PAR to topics of energy justice and infrastructural citizenship in urban informal settlements. By focusing on the lived experiences of residents, this work demonstrates the value of integrating local knowledge and collaborative problem-solving into energy research and policy. Our results demonstrate how the insights from PAR can enrich traditional infrastructure planning and management processes to foster more equitable, just, and democratic energy transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 104143"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite generally high rates of grid connectivity in African cities, electricity access among users in informal settlements remains heavily constrained. This study explores the challenges that restrict electricity access and use across 25 informal settlements in Kampala, Uganda using a mixed-methods participatory action research (PAR) approach conducted by an inter- and transdisciplinary team. We find that the high cost of electricity, a complex and expensive utility connection process, weak renter protections, an unstable power supply, the poor condition and coverage of distribution infrastructure, and a lack of trust and communication between communities and electricity service providers were substantial barriers to electricity access and use. We present solutions that were identified and evaluated during a series of collaborative workshops with community members and other stakeholders. The study documents the research process as an application of PAR to topics of energy justice and infrastructural citizenship in urban informal settlements. By focusing on the lived experiences of residents, this work demonstrates the value of integrating local knowledge and collaborative problem-solving into energy research and policy. Our results demonstrate how the insights from PAR can enrich traditional infrastructure planning and management processes to foster more equitable, just, and democratic energy transitions.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.