Social network intervention to improve blood pressure control after stroke: The TEAMS-BP randomized clinical trial

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Amar Dhand , Katherine Crum , Kaitlin E. Hanken , Gauri Bhatkhande , Melinda Luo , Ian M. Corbin , George Usmanov , Zachary Rothfeld-Wehrwein , Vrushali Dhongade , David Lin , Chloe Slocum , Nancy Haff , Niteesh K. Choudhry
{"title":"Social network intervention to improve blood pressure control after stroke: The TEAMS-BP randomized clinical trial","authors":"Amar Dhand ,&nbsp;Katherine Crum ,&nbsp;Kaitlin E. Hanken ,&nbsp;Gauri Bhatkhande ,&nbsp;Melinda Luo ,&nbsp;Ian M. Corbin ,&nbsp;George Usmanov ,&nbsp;Zachary Rothfeld-Wehrwein ,&nbsp;Vrushali Dhongade ,&nbsp;David Lin ,&nbsp;Chloe Slocum ,&nbsp;Nancy Haff ,&nbsp;Niteesh K. Choudhry","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social connections play an important role in predicting health outcomes after a stroke. In the context of clinical medicine, a social network theory proposes that each patient is embedded in a personal social network of interpersonal connections that provide social support, information, and behavioral cues. However, the effectiveness of activating and harnessing supportive personal social networks remains uncertain, particularly within healthcare situations where individualism prevails. As an initial step towards developing interventions for healthier social networks in clinical practice, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in stroke survivors. This trial compared a network intervention versus individual counseling for 3 months with the aim of lowering blood pressure after stroke. Over 2 years, we recruited 45 stroke survivors, with 24 assigned to the network intervention and 21 to the individual counseling group. Results indicated no significant difference in the primary outcome of absolute systolic blood pressure difference over 3 months between the two groups. However, subgroup analyses revealed that patients within small and close-knit networks, known as high constraint networks, who received the network intervention had a significantly larger reduction in blood pressure than patients within large and open, low constraint, networks. The study's findings are preliminary due to dropout rates in both arms, and variable engagement of network members in the intervention arm. Nevertheless, our results suggest the potential of leveraging social networks to enhance health outcomes in specific subgroups of stroke survivors, highlighting avenues for further research and intervention development. Clinical Trial Unique Identifier: NCT05258890.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"380 ","pages":"Article 118231"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625005623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social connections play an important role in predicting health outcomes after a stroke. In the context of clinical medicine, a social network theory proposes that each patient is embedded in a personal social network of interpersonal connections that provide social support, information, and behavioral cues. However, the effectiveness of activating and harnessing supportive personal social networks remains uncertain, particularly within healthcare situations where individualism prevails. As an initial step towards developing interventions for healthier social networks in clinical practice, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in stroke survivors. This trial compared a network intervention versus individual counseling for 3 months with the aim of lowering blood pressure after stroke. Over 2 years, we recruited 45 stroke survivors, with 24 assigned to the network intervention and 21 to the individual counseling group. Results indicated no significant difference in the primary outcome of absolute systolic blood pressure difference over 3 months between the two groups. However, subgroup analyses revealed that patients within small and close-knit networks, known as high constraint networks, who received the network intervention had a significantly larger reduction in blood pressure than patients within large and open, low constraint, networks. The study's findings are preliminary due to dropout rates in both arms, and variable engagement of network members in the intervention arm. Nevertheless, our results suggest the potential of leveraging social networks to enhance health outcomes in specific subgroups of stroke survivors, highlighting avenues for further research and intervention development. Clinical Trial Unique Identifier: NCT05258890.
社会网络干预改善脑卒中后血压控制:TEAMS-BP随机临床试验
社会关系在预测中风后的健康状况方面发挥着重要作用。在临床医学的背景下,社会网络理论提出,每个病人都嵌入一个个人的社会网络的人际关系,提供社会支持,信息和行为线索。然而,激活和利用支持性个人社会网络的有效性仍然不确定,特别是在个人主义盛行的医疗保健情况下。作为在临床实践中开发更健康的社会网络干预措施的第一步,我们在中风幸存者中进行了一项随机对照试验。该试验比较了网络干预与个体咨询三个月的卒中后血压降低效果。在两年多的时间里,我们招募了45名中风幸存者,其中24人被分配到网络干预组,21人被分配到个人咨询组。结果显示,两组3个月绝对收缩压差的主要转归无显著差异。然而,亚组分析显示,在小而紧密的网络(称为高约束网络)中接受网络干预的患者比在大而开放的低约束网络中的患者血压下降明显更大。这项研究的结果是初步的,因为两组的辍学率,以及干预组网络成员的不同参与。然而,我们的研究结果表明,利用社会网络来提高中风幸存者特定亚组的健康结果的潜力,强调了进一步研究和干预开发的途径。临床试验唯一标识符:NCT05258890。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信