Amar Dhand , Katherine Crum , Kaitlin E. Hanken , Gauri Bhatkhande , Melinda Luo , Ian M. Corbin , George Usmanov , Zachary Rothfeld-Wehrwein , Vrushali Dhongade , David Lin , Chloe Slocum , Nancy Haff , Niteesh K. Choudhry
{"title":"Social network intervention to improve blood pressure control after stroke: The TEAMS-BP randomized clinical trial","authors":"Amar Dhand , Katherine Crum , Kaitlin E. Hanken , Gauri Bhatkhande , Melinda Luo , Ian M. Corbin , George Usmanov , Zachary Rothfeld-Wehrwein , Vrushali Dhongade , David Lin , Chloe Slocum , Nancy Haff , Niteesh K. Choudhry","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social connections play an important role in predicting health outcomes after a stroke. In the context of clinical medicine, a social network theory proposes that each patient is embedded in a personal social network of interpersonal connections that provide social support, information, and behavioral cues. However, the effectiveness of activating and harnessing supportive personal social networks remains uncertain, particularly within healthcare situations where individualism prevails. As an initial step towards developing interventions for healthier social networks in clinical practice, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in stroke survivors. This trial compared a network intervention versus individual counseling for 3 months with the aim of lowering blood pressure after stroke. Over 2 years, we recruited 45 stroke survivors, with 24 assigned to the network intervention and 21 to the individual counseling group. Results indicated no significant difference in the primary outcome of absolute systolic blood pressure difference over 3 months between the two groups. However, subgroup analyses revealed that patients within small and close-knit networks, known as high constraint networks, who received the network intervention had a significantly larger reduction in blood pressure than patients within large and open, low constraint, networks. The study's findings are preliminary due to dropout rates in both arms, and variable engagement of network members in the intervention arm. Nevertheless, our results suggest the potential of leveraging social networks to enhance health outcomes in specific subgroups of stroke survivors, highlighting avenues for further research and intervention development. Clinical Trial Unique Identifier: NCT05258890.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"380 ","pages":"Article 118231"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625005623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Social connections play an important role in predicting health outcomes after a stroke. In the context of clinical medicine, a social network theory proposes that each patient is embedded in a personal social network of interpersonal connections that provide social support, information, and behavioral cues. However, the effectiveness of activating and harnessing supportive personal social networks remains uncertain, particularly within healthcare situations where individualism prevails. As an initial step towards developing interventions for healthier social networks in clinical practice, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in stroke survivors. This trial compared a network intervention versus individual counseling for 3 months with the aim of lowering blood pressure after stroke. Over 2 years, we recruited 45 stroke survivors, with 24 assigned to the network intervention and 21 to the individual counseling group. Results indicated no significant difference in the primary outcome of absolute systolic blood pressure difference over 3 months between the two groups. However, subgroup analyses revealed that patients within small and close-knit networks, known as high constraint networks, who received the network intervention had a significantly larger reduction in blood pressure than patients within large and open, low constraint, networks. The study's findings are preliminary due to dropout rates in both arms, and variable engagement of network members in the intervention arm. Nevertheless, our results suggest the potential of leveraging social networks to enhance health outcomes in specific subgroups of stroke survivors, highlighting avenues for further research and intervention development. Clinical Trial Unique Identifier: NCT05258890.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.