Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Profiles in Primary and Secondary Landfill Leachates: Indications of Transformation, Liner Interactions, and other PFAS Sources

IF 12.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Nicole M. Robey, Yalan Liu, Thabet M. Tolaymat, John A. Bowden, Helena Solo-Gabriele, Timothy G. Townsend
{"title":"Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Profiles in Primary and Secondary Landfill Leachates: Indications of Transformation, Liner Interactions, and other PFAS Sources","authors":"Nicole M. Robey, Yalan Liu, Thabet M. Tolaymat, John A. Bowden, Helena Solo-Gabriele, Timothy G. Townsend","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a growing concern due to their persistence, bioaccumulation potential, and continued widespread use in consumer products. PFAS disposed of in landfills are emitted to the environment via leachate, which drives a need to better understand PFAS behavior in landfills and landfill liner systems. This study examines PFAS concentrations in primary and secondary leachate from three municipal solid waste landfills utilizing double HDPE geomembrane liner systems. Samples were also analyzed for physical-chemical constituents such as chloride, ammonia, chemical oxygen demand, and metals. On average, physical-chemical parameter concentrations were significantly lower in the secondary compared to the primary leachate, although PFAS concentrations were not significantly different between leachate sources. Concentrations of chloride in groundwater and primary leachate were used to calculate expected PFAS concentrations in the secondary leachate. PFAS concentrations in secondary leachate were often higher than expected, with PFAAs more likely to exceed expected levels. Of the 92 PFAS analyzed, 50 were quantified in primary leachates and 48 in secondary leachates. The ∑PFAS concentrations in primary leachate ranged from 3,200-81,000 ngL<sup>−1</sup>, and secondary leachate ranged from 3,300-96,000 ngL<sup>−1</sup>. Possible explanations for the disproportionately high PFAS concentrations in secondary leachates, including residence time, transformation, liner sorption, and other PFAS sources (e.g., landfill gas) are explored. While liner systems are highly effective, PFAS migration through landfill liners and potential groundwater impacts remain a concern. This study underscores the importance of continued research into PFAS migration mechanisms and the potential environmental impacts of unidentified precursor PFAS in landfills.","PeriodicalId":361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","volume":"138 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138705","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a growing concern due to their persistence, bioaccumulation potential, and continued widespread use in consumer products. PFAS disposed of in landfills are emitted to the environment via leachate, which drives a need to better understand PFAS behavior in landfills and landfill liner systems. This study examines PFAS concentrations in primary and secondary leachate from three municipal solid waste landfills utilizing double HDPE geomembrane liner systems. Samples were also analyzed for physical-chemical constituents such as chloride, ammonia, chemical oxygen demand, and metals. On average, physical-chemical parameter concentrations were significantly lower in the secondary compared to the primary leachate, although PFAS concentrations were not significantly different between leachate sources. Concentrations of chloride in groundwater and primary leachate were used to calculate expected PFAS concentrations in the secondary leachate. PFAS concentrations in secondary leachate were often higher than expected, with PFAAs more likely to exceed expected levels. Of the 92 PFAS analyzed, 50 were quantified in primary leachates and 48 in secondary leachates. The ∑PFAS concentrations in primary leachate ranged from 3,200-81,000 ngL−1, and secondary leachate ranged from 3,300-96,000 ngL−1. Possible explanations for the disproportionately high PFAS concentrations in secondary leachates, including residence time, transformation, liner sorption, and other PFAS sources (e.g., landfill gas) are explored. While liner systems are highly effective, PFAS migration through landfill liners and potential groundwater impacts remain a concern. This study underscores the importance of continued research into PFAS migration mechanisms and the potential environmental impacts of unidentified precursor PFAS in landfills.

Abstract Image

一级和二级垃圾填埋场渗滤液中的全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)概况:转化、衬里相互作用和其他PFAS来源的迹象
全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)由于其持久性、生物蓄积性和在消费品中的持续广泛使用而日益受到关注。在垃圾填埋场处理的PFAS通过渗滤液排放到环境中,这使得需要更好地了解PFAS在垃圾填埋场和垃圾填埋场衬垫系统中的行为。本研究利用双层HDPE土工膜衬垫系统检测了三个城市固体垃圾填埋场一次和二次渗滤液中的PFAS浓度。还分析了样品的物理化学成分,如氯化物、氨、化学需氧量和金属。平均而言,次级渗滤液的物理化学参数浓度明显低于初级渗滤液,尽管不同渗滤液来源之间的PFAS浓度差异不显著。利用地下水和初级渗滤液中的氯化物浓度计算二级渗滤液中PFAS的预期浓度。二级渗滤液中的PFAS浓度往往高于预期,更有可能超过预期水平。在分析的92个PFAS中,50个在初级渗滤液中被量化,48个在二级渗滤液中被量化。初级渗滤液中∑PFAS浓度为3200 ~ 81000 ngL−1,次级渗滤液中∑PFAS浓度为3300 ~ 96000 ngL−1。探讨了二级渗滤液中不成比例的高PFAS浓度的可能解释,包括停留时间、转化、衬垫吸附和其他PFAS来源(如垃圾填埋气)。虽然衬垫系统非常有效,但PFAS通过垃圾填埋场衬垫迁移和潜在的地下水影响仍然令人担忧。这项研究强调了继续研究PFAS迁移机制和未知前体PFAS在垃圾填埋场的潜在环境影响的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Journal of Hazardous Materials 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
25.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
3059
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hazardous Materials serves as a global platform for promoting cutting-edge research in the field of Environmental Science and Engineering. Our publication features a wide range of articles, including full-length research papers, review articles, and perspectives, with the aim of enhancing our understanding of the dangers and risks associated with various materials concerning public health and the environment. It is important to note that the term "environmental contaminants" refers specifically to substances that pose hazardous effects through contamination, while excluding those that do not have such impacts on the environment or human health. Moreover, we emphasize the distinction between wastes and hazardous materials in order to provide further clarity on the scope of the journal. We have a keen interest in exploring specific compounds and microbial agents that have adverse effects on the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信