Interconnections among co-existing soil bacteria taxa drive the home-field advantage of litter decomposition

IF 5.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Yong Lin, Fusheng Chen, Chengkang Xia, Fangchao Wang, Shengnan Wang, Chao Liang, Xiaofei Hu
{"title":"Interconnections among co-existing soil bacteria taxa drive the home-field advantage of litter decomposition","authors":"Yong Lin, Fusheng Chen, Chengkang Xia, Fangchao Wang, Shengnan Wang, Chao Liang, Xiaofei Hu","doi":"10.1007/s00374-025-01922-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The home-field advantage (HFA) hypothesis postulates that plant litter decomposes faster in the home habitat than in other locations (i.e., away site) due to specialized microbial decomposers. However, we still have limited understanding of how specific microbes contribute to HFA. Here, we examined how variation in HFA relates to differences in soil bacterial diversity and interconnections among co-existing bacteria taxa. A 480-d reciprocal transplant experiment was designed using <i>Schima superba</i> and <i>Zea mays</i> litter collected from forest and farmland ecosystems, respectively. Our findings showed that litter decomposition is associated with specific soil bacterial taxa that generate HFA effects for litter use. The decomposition of labile <i>Z. mays</i> litter in away site increased the biodiversity of soil bacteria, thereby creating more complex and stable co-occurrence networks. In contrast, the decomposition of recalcitrant <i>S. superba</i> litter in away site reduced the interconnections among co-existing taxa by preventing the establishment of specific taxa such as Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, resulting in less complex and stable networks. The simplified bacterial networks in away sites led to reduced ecosystem functions, including nutrient cycling and decomposition, and were responsible for the generation of HFA in litter decomposition. Furthermore, the effect of soil bacterial diversity on litter mass loss was indirectly driven by network stability, suggesting that interconnections among co-existing taxa enable a better explanation how specific microbes contribute to drive HFA than the diversity metrics. Our results highlight the importance of co-occurrence networks as a key component of microbial biodiversity linking it with litter decomposition.</p>","PeriodicalId":9210,"journal":{"name":"Biology and Fertility of Soils","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology and Fertility of Soils","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-025-01922-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The home-field advantage (HFA) hypothesis postulates that plant litter decomposes faster in the home habitat than in other locations (i.e., away site) due to specialized microbial decomposers. However, we still have limited understanding of how specific microbes contribute to HFA. Here, we examined how variation in HFA relates to differences in soil bacterial diversity and interconnections among co-existing bacteria taxa. A 480-d reciprocal transplant experiment was designed using Schima superba and Zea mays litter collected from forest and farmland ecosystems, respectively. Our findings showed that litter decomposition is associated with specific soil bacterial taxa that generate HFA effects for litter use. The decomposition of labile Z. mays litter in away site increased the biodiversity of soil bacteria, thereby creating more complex and stable co-occurrence networks. In contrast, the decomposition of recalcitrant S. superba litter in away site reduced the interconnections among co-existing taxa by preventing the establishment of specific taxa such as Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, resulting in less complex and stable networks. The simplified bacterial networks in away sites led to reduced ecosystem functions, including nutrient cycling and decomposition, and were responsible for the generation of HFA in litter decomposition. Furthermore, the effect of soil bacterial diversity on litter mass loss was indirectly driven by network stability, suggesting that interconnections among co-existing taxa enable a better explanation how specific microbes contribute to drive HFA than the diversity metrics. Our results highlight the importance of co-occurrence networks as a key component of microbial biodiversity linking it with litter decomposition.

共存的土壤细菌类群之间的相互联系驱动了凋落物分解的主场优势
主场优势假说认为,由于专门的微生物分解者,植物凋落物在主场比在其他地点(即客场)分解得更快。然而,我们对特定微生物如何促进HFA的理解仍然有限。在这里,我们研究了HFA的变化与土壤细菌多样性的差异以及共存细菌分类群之间的相互联系的关系。以森林和农田生态系统中采集的木荷和玉米凋落物为材料,设计了480 d的反向移栽试验。研究结果表明,凋落物分解与产生HFA效应的特定土壤细菌类群有关。游离地易枯落物的分解增加了土壤细菌的多样性,从而形成了更复杂、更稳定的共生网络。与此相反,拮抗S. superba凋落物在异地的分解减少了共存类群之间的相互联系,阻止了特定类群(如变形菌门和放线菌门)的建立,导致网络不那么复杂和稳定。细菌网络的简化导致生态系统功能的降低,包括养分循环和分解,并负责凋落物分解中HFA的产生。此外,土壤细菌多样性对凋落物质量损失的影响是由网络稳定性间接驱动的,这表明共存分类群之间的相互联系比多样性指标更能解释特定微生物对HFA的驱动作用。我们的研究结果强调了共生网络作为微生物生物多样性与凋落物分解联系在一起的关键组成部分的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology and Fertility of Soils
Biology and Fertility of Soils 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
10.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Biology and Fertility of Soils publishes in English original papers, reviews and short communications on all fundamental and applied aspects of biology – microflora and microfauna - and fertility of soils. It offers a forum for research aimed at broadening the understanding of biological functions, processes and interactions in soils, particularly concerning the increasing demands of agriculture, deforestation and industrialization. The journal includes articles on techniques and methods that evaluate processes, biogeochemical interactions and ecological stresses, and sometimes presents special issues on relevant topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信