Surgical treatment of otogenic vertigo.

IF 2.2
Tian Yu, Xiaohong Chen
{"title":"Surgical treatment of otogenic vertigo.","authors":"Tian Yu, Xiaohong Chen","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09467-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide a comprehensive review of surgical strategies for vestibular dysfunction-induced vertigo (VDIV), including indications, contraindications, and comparative efficacy analyses of mainstream procedures, and to critically evaluate contemporary controversies and emerging directions based on recent advancements.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Vestibular dysfunction-induced vertigo (VDIV), a balance disorder caused by inner ear pathology, significantly impacts patients' quality of life and often requires surgical intervention when conservative treatments fail. While pharmacological management and vestibular rehabilitation alleviate symptoms in most cases, approximately 10-20% of patients progress to refractory VDIV due to failed conservative treatment, necessitating surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article provides a comprehensive review of surgical strategies for VDIV, including indications, contraindications, and comparative efficacy analyses of mainstream procedures (e.g., endolymphatic sac decompression, semicircular canal occlusion, vestibular neurectomy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Current evidence suggests that ESD offers symptom control in 62.1%-80.36% of patients with minimal invasiveness, while transcanal semicircular canal plugging (TSCP) achieves higher success rates (96.7%-100%) at the cost of potential hearing loss. For patients in the advanced stage of the disease, combined surgical procedures (such as ESD+TSCP) can achieve a balance between vertigo control (100%) and hearing preservation (with a hearing loss rate of 33.3%).  CONCLUSION: The selection of surgical methods should be based on a comprehensive consideration of the patient's specific condition, including the severity of vertigo, hearing level, and overall health status. Future research should focus on exploring more effective and less invasive surgical techniques to improve the prognosis of patients. Additionally, in-depth studies on the long-term outcomes and quality of life of patients after different surgical procedures are necessary to provide more scientific and reliable evidence for clinical decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":520614,"journal":{"name":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09467-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To provide a comprehensive review of surgical strategies for vestibular dysfunction-induced vertigo (VDIV), including indications, contraindications, and comparative efficacy analyses of mainstream procedures, and to critically evaluate contemporary controversies and emerging directions based on recent advancements.

Background: Vestibular dysfunction-induced vertigo (VDIV), a balance disorder caused by inner ear pathology, significantly impacts patients' quality of life and often requires surgical intervention when conservative treatments fail. While pharmacological management and vestibular rehabilitation alleviate symptoms in most cases, approximately 10-20% of patients progress to refractory VDIV due to failed conservative treatment, necessitating surgical intervention.

Methods: This article provides a comprehensive review of surgical strategies for VDIV, including indications, contraindications, and comparative efficacy analyses of mainstream procedures (e.g., endolymphatic sac decompression, semicircular canal occlusion, vestibular neurectomy).

Results: Current evidence suggests that ESD offers symptom control in 62.1%-80.36% of patients with minimal invasiveness, while transcanal semicircular canal plugging (TSCP) achieves higher success rates (96.7%-100%) at the cost of potential hearing loss. For patients in the advanced stage of the disease, combined surgical procedures (such as ESD+TSCP) can achieve a balance between vertigo control (100%) and hearing preservation (with a hearing loss rate of 33.3%).  CONCLUSION: The selection of surgical methods should be based on a comprehensive consideration of the patient's specific condition, including the severity of vertigo, hearing level, and overall health status. Future research should focus on exploring more effective and less invasive surgical techniques to improve the prognosis of patients. Additionally, in-depth studies on the long-term outcomes and quality of life of patients after different surgical procedures are necessary to provide more scientific and reliable evidence for clinical decision making.

耳源性眩晕的外科治疗。
目的:综述前庭功能障碍性眩晕(VDIV)的手术治疗策略,包括适应证、禁忌症和主流手术的比较疗效分析,并根据最新进展对当前的争议和新兴方向进行批判性评价。背景:前庭功能障碍性眩晕(VDIV)是一种由内耳病理引起的平衡障碍,严重影响患者的生活质量,保守治疗失败后往往需要手术干预。虽然药物治疗和前庭康复在大多数情况下可以缓解症状,但由于保守治疗失败,大约10-20%的患者进展为难治性VDIV,需要手术干预。方法:本文综述了VDIV的手术治疗策略,包括适应症、禁忌症以及主流手术(如淋巴囊减压、半规管闭塞、前庭神经切除术)的疗效对比分析。结果:目前有证据表明,ESD能以最小的侵入性控制62.1% ~ 80.36%的患者的症状,而经鼻半规管封堵(TSCP)的成功率更高(96.7% ~ 100%),但代价是潜在的听力损失。对于疾病晚期患者,联合手术(如ESD+TSCP)可实现眩晕控制(100%)和听力保护(听力失失率33.3%)的平衡。结论:手术方式的选择应综合考虑患者的具体情况,包括眩晕的严重程度、听力水平和整体健康状况。未来的研究应着眼于探索更有效、更微创的手术技术,以改善患者的预后。此外,有必要深入研究不同手术方式后患者的远期预后和生活质量,为临床决策提供更科学可靠的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信