Moving towards making (quantitative) structure-activity relationships ((Q)SARs) for toxicity-related endpoints findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR).

ALTEX Pub Date : 2025-05-19 DOI:10.14573/altex.2411161
Samuel J Belfield, Homa Basiri, Swapnil Chavan, Georgios Chrysochoou, Steven J Enoch, James W Firman, Anish Gomatam, Barry Hardy, Palle S Helmke, Judith C Madden, Uko Maran, Eric March-Vila, Nikolai G Nikolov, Manuel Pastor, Geven Piir, Sulev Sild, Aljoša Smajić, Nicoleta Spînu, Eva B Wedebye, Mark T D Cronin
{"title":"Moving towards making (quantitative) structure-activity relationships ((Q)SARs) for toxicity-related endpoints findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR).","authors":"Samuel J Belfield, Homa Basiri, Swapnil Chavan, Georgios Chrysochoou, Steven J Enoch, James W Firman, Anish Gomatam, Barry Hardy, Palle S Helmke, Judith C Madden, Uko Maran, Eric March-Vila, Nikolai G Nikolov, Manuel Pastor, Geven Piir, Sulev Sild, Aljoša Smajić, Nicoleta Spînu, Eva B Wedebye, Mark T D Cronin","doi":"10.14573/altex.2411161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(Quantitative) structure-activity relationships ((Q)SARs) are widely used in chemical safety assessment to predict toxicological effects. Many thousands of (Q)SAR models have been developed and published, however, few are easily available to use. This investigation has applied previously developed Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reuse (FAIR) Principles for in silico models to six published, different, machine learning (ML) (Q)SARs for the same toxicity dataset (inhibition of growth to Tetrahymena pyriformis). The majority of principles were met, however, there are still gaps in making (Q)SARs FAIR. This study has enabled insights into, and recommendations for, the FAIRification of (Q)SARs including areas where more work and effort may be required. For instance, there is still a need for (Q)SARs to be associated with a unique identifier and full data / metadata for toxicological activity or endpoints, molecular properties and descriptors, as well as model description to be provided in a standardised manner. A number of solutions to the challenges were identified, such as building on the QSAR Model Reporting Format (QMRF) and the application of QSAR Assessment Framework (QAF). This study also demonstrated that resources such as the QSAR Databank (QsarDB, www.qsardb.org) are valuable in storing ML QSARs in a searchable database and also provide a Digital Object Identifier (DOI). Many activities related to FAIR are currently underway and (Q)SAR modellers should be encouraged to utilise these to move towards the easier access and use of models. Enabling FAIR computational toxicology models will support the overall progress towards animal free chemical safety assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":520550,"journal":{"name":"ALTEX","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ALTEX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2411161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(Quantitative) structure-activity relationships ((Q)SARs) are widely used in chemical safety assessment to predict toxicological effects. Many thousands of (Q)SAR models have been developed and published, however, few are easily available to use. This investigation has applied previously developed Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reuse (FAIR) Principles for in silico models to six published, different, machine learning (ML) (Q)SARs for the same toxicity dataset (inhibition of growth to Tetrahymena pyriformis). The majority of principles were met, however, there are still gaps in making (Q)SARs FAIR. This study has enabled insights into, and recommendations for, the FAIRification of (Q)SARs including areas where more work and effort may be required. For instance, there is still a need for (Q)SARs to be associated with a unique identifier and full data / metadata for toxicological activity or endpoints, molecular properties and descriptors, as well as model description to be provided in a standardised manner. A number of solutions to the challenges were identified, such as building on the QSAR Model Reporting Format (QMRF) and the application of QSAR Assessment Framework (QAF). This study also demonstrated that resources such as the QSAR Databank (QsarDB, www.qsardb.org) are valuable in storing ML QSARs in a searchable database and also provide a Digital Object Identifier (DOI). Many activities related to FAIR are currently underway and (Q)SAR modellers should be encouraged to utilise these to move towards the easier access and use of models. Enabling FAIR computational toxicology models will support the overall progress towards animal free chemical safety assessment.

朝着建立(定量的)结构-活性关系((Q) sar)的方向发展,使毒性相关端点可找到、可访问、可互操作和可重用(FAIR)。
定量构效关系(Quantitative structure-activity relationship,简称Q - sar)被广泛应用于化学品安全评价中,以预测毒理学效应。已经开发和出版了成千上万的(Q)SAR模型,然而,很少有容易使用的。本研究将先前开发的计算机模型的可查找性、可访问性、互操作性和重用性(FAIR)原则应用于相同毒性数据集(抑制梨形四膜虫的生长)的六个已发表的不同机器学习(ML) (Q) sar。大多数原则得到了满足,然而,在使(Q)SARs公平方面仍存在差距。这项研究为(Q) sar的公平化提供了见解和建议,包括可能需要更多工作和努力的领域。例如,仍需要将(Q)SARs与唯一标识符和毒理学活动或端点、分子特性和描述符的完整数据/元数据以及以标准化方式提供的模型描述相关联。会议确定了应对挑战的若干解决方案,如建立QSAR模型报告格式(QMRF)和应用QSAR评估框架(QAF)。该研究还表明,QSAR数据库(QsarDB, www.qsardb.org)等资源在将ML QSAR存储在可搜索的数据库中是有价值的,并且还提供了数字对象标识符(DOI)。与FAIR相关的许多活动目前正在进行中,应鼓励(Q)SAR建模者利用这些活动,以便更容易地获取和使用模型。启用FAIR计算毒理学模型将支持对无动物化学品安全评估的总体进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信